Designer Steroid/prohormone profiles

Page 4 of 20 First ... 23456 ... Last

  1. Awesome post. I had been compiling a sort of "scorecard" like this myself, to keep track of what is what, but got nowhere near your completeness and level of detail.

    One thing I'll argue with a bit:

    Quote Originally Posted by thesinner View Post
    Prostanozol/ Orasan-E
    Innovators: Gaspari Nutrition, ALRI
    Nomenclature: [3,2-c]pyrazole-5alpha-etioallocholane-17beta-tetrahydropyranol
    Pill size: 25mg
    Dosages: 50-150mg (Although it is not uncommon to go much higher than this)
    Side effects: very few sides. Some users report thinning hair/hair loss.
    Reputation: Possibly the most mild of the designers, this compound is rarely run standalone. It is often stacked with a methyl compound for a lean bulk or cut. Very mild, yet easily maintained gains.
    This is a de-alkylated derivative of Stanozol (winstrol).
    I've read very out of whack liver and lipids from this substance, at least when combined with other allegedly mild (non methylated) substances. I think there is something whacky about the base compound; I know winny also profoundly alters liver and lipids. Anyway, until someone uses it by itself and gets blood tests, there really is no hard data on its mildness. It has a reputation as being mild, but other substances have actual hard data one way or another. The data on this one seem awfully skewed towards the M-1T end of things without the payoff.

    -p66
    •   
       


  2. Hey sinner, could you possibly list in your write-up which steroids are class I and which steroids are class II. The hardest part for me personally when researching the steroids is trying to predict whether the steroid is class I or II. I havent really found much definitive data on this, and I think that it would be very beneficial for most users.

  3. Quote Originally Posted by haroldjg View Post
    Hey sinner, could you possibly list in your write-up which steroids are class I and which steroids are class II. The hardest part for me personally when researching the steroids is trying to predict whether the steroid is class I or II. I havent really found much definitive data on this, and I think that it would be very beneficial for most users.
    I honestly don't know what you mean by the classes. Can you please elaborate?

  4. I believe he's referring to their control status.
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49

  5. Class I activity refering to activity involving the androgen receptor. Class II activity refering to activity not mediated by the androgen receptor. Example of a primarilly Class I --- Tren. Example of a primarilly Class II --- Anadrol or Boldenone. Maybe I am mixed up or something...... these are just characteristics I look for in steroids. When I look for steroids that would stack well together I always look for a Class I and a Class II. Maybe I am screwed up and shouldnt look for these characteristics anymore.

  6. not screwed up at all.... cept most people figure classes considering it Androgenic or Anabolic or dry and wet. class I and II are ususally used in reference to controlled substances inlcuding rec drugs......

    but choosing your substances accordingly is VERY important when considering your goals and/or stacks.

  7. so what is Methyl E? i noticed it's chem comp is close to havoc/epi but not only hlaf of it matchs up! so is it a new compound?

  8. Quote Originally Posted by grila jujitsu View Post
    so what is Methyl E? i noticed it's chem comp is close to havoc/epi but not only hlaf of it matchs up! so is it a new compound?
    This is by EST (if my memory serves me correctly) it is a Havoc/epi clone. Double check the nomenclature on the site you saw it on. It could be one of two things:
    1) They're using a synonym.
    2) There's a typo in that site's write-up. (These are actually fairly common).

  9. Love this thread....and why hasnt it been stickied yet??
    •   
       

  10. Talking methyl e


    Quote Originally Posted by thesinner View Post
    This is by EST (if my memory serves me correctly) it is a Havoc/epi clone. Double check the nomenclature on the site you saw it on. It could be one of two things:
    1) They're using a synonym.
    2) There's a typo in that site's write-up. (These are actually fairly common).
    fo sho brah ! thatnks for the info. i was looking at it on a website.

  11. Bump.

    Looking forward to this becoming a sticky.

  12. sticky icky icky!!!

  13. Quote Originally Posted by poopypants View Post
    sticky icky icky!!!
    Oooheeeeee, put it in the air!

  14. Sinner got a write-up for M1P? I will be logging 17 Methyl-Bol from EST which is a clone of M1P.

  15. Quote Originally Posted by thesinner View Post
    Be sure to PM me a link, I'd love to follow.
    I was thinking of logging it here too. I will be bridging it with Methyl-E. From what I have read its low on the toxicity and a tad wet so it will be a pretty bulker well thats what I am hoping for.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    I was thinking of logging it here too. I will be bridging it with Methyl-E. From what I have read its low on the toxicity and a tad wet so it will be a pretty bulker well thats what I am hoping for.
    I could be mistaken, but I believe Methyl-E is the same as Havoc/ Epistane. So, wetness 'should' not be an attribute. Then again, Poopy gained 13 pds off epi.

  17. Quote Originally Posted by D_town View Post
    I could be mistaken, but I believe Methyl-E is the same as Havoc/ Epistane. So, wetness 'should' not be an attribute. Then again, Poopy gained 13 pds off epi.
    I was saying the 17 MB was a tad wet and the Methyl-E should help me lean out after the 17 MB.

  18. Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    I was saying the 17 MB was a tad wet and the Methyl-E should help me lean out after the 17 MB.
    now it is clear to me

  19. Dang Poppy gained 13lbs on Epi thats awesome. Well I had better a little more than that with this stack.

  20. Quote Originally Posted by D_town View Post
    I could be mistaken, but I believe Methyl-E is the same as Havoc/ Epistane. So, wetness 'should' not be an attribute. Then again, Poopy gained 13 pds off epi.
    13.5.... n it wasnt wet in the least, it was almost superdrolish in it weight gains and i added another 5 during post cycle therapy. all LBM as i can say i havnt put on any extra fat and wasnt bloated or just holding water since i havnt even taken creatine for a week now and still holding same weight. btw strength all stayed too, infact im stronger now then when i was on.

    just lots of good sourced clean cals and hard ass work.

  21. Quote Originally Posted by thesinner View Post
    Yeah, A few weeks/months ago (I lose track of time) I was talking to someone on this forum, who was looking to run his first designer cycle. I gave him the low down on things I've run, and he mentioned the idea of creating a sticky for it.
    I think I broke the "spread some reps" box when you sent that reply to my thread!

    With your background, I could see you starting your own supplement/research chemical company.

    SinnerSupplements

  22. ok so heres my question, what are mass tans considered? they r some what like superdral but there not the same i dont think.

    mass tabs
    2a, 17a-dimethyl-17-hydroxy-5a-androstan-1-ene-3one

  23. Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    I was saying the 17 MB was a tad wet and the Methyl-E should help me lean out after the 17 MB.
    Alot of bad reviews about M1P, I took it and it sucked! And the methyl E is no better!

  24. whats methyl e??????

  25. Quote Originally Posted by poopypants View Post
    whats methyl e??????
    supposed to be epi clone

  26. Quote Originally Posted by jerz912 View Post
    Alot of bad reviews about M1P, I took it and it sucked! And the methyl E is no better!
    When did you take M1-P? I was just wondering, since your 21 and M1-P hasn't been readily available for over a year. BTW, 17-Methyl Bol is structure as a -diol and M1-P is a -dione. That greatly affects the compound's potency. BTW, I recommend that you stop stacking SD with Methyl E. I understand that you feel that it(Methyl E)wasn't providing you with results you were looking for in two weeks, but the stack of SD and Methyl E is harmful and not your best interest health-wise.

  27. I think H-Bomb has that same "diol" structure you're referring to, plus some AIs. I would like to hear some real world experience on this product too
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. New Steroid Hormone & Designer Steroid Profiles!
    By Eric Potratz in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 12-12-2014, 11:23 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-21-2011, 03:10 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 11:06 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-03-2010, 05:12 PM
  5. Least suppressive designer steroids/prohormones
    By g0hardorgohom in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-01-2010, 11:03 AM
Log in
Log in