Epistane testing results
- 04-11-2007, 09:43 AM
- 04-11-2007, 09:44 AM
SubscribedRcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
- 04-11-2007, 09:45 AM
04-11-2007, 09:53 AM
Before this thread reaches 20 pages, could someone explain what this paragraph means:
ThanksThe major peak found
has a retention time of 20.48 min and has a major ion of 270. The peak did not match any know
standard we have in-house, and did not match any compound in NIST or Wiley mass spectral
libraries; therefore we cannot identify the compound. A reference standard of the labeled
compound could not be obtained from our typical supplier. Using a similar compound, we
quantified the amount relative to a reference standard of certified 99 % pure analytical standard
of Testosterone to provide an estimated amount per capsule.
04-11-2007, 09:58 AM
A quote from PA on bb.com:
Bodybuilding.com Forums - View Single Post - Epistane Testing Resultsyes the results for havoc show that the stuff contains a compuond that has a MW of 288. 288 is the correct MW for the methylepistanol (it desulfurizes in the injection port to give 288)
otoh this mass spectrum that mike posted here has a MW of 270.
all of this i knew for a long time as we tested it and saw the same thing
04-11-2007, 10:03 AM
04-11-2007, 10:16 AM
So in theory, each molecule of epistane weighs 288 units. But the most abundant substance in the sample tested weighed 270 units, which means that it is not the same thing as it was claimed to be. Correct?
Then they quantify the amount of that stuff, that apparently weighs 270, by comparing it with test, which weighs 288. I don't understand that part.
04-11-2007, 10:31 AM
Well i'm officially still needing to buy a clue.
04-11-2007, 10:35 AM
This was the labs response to me when I asked if the pills only contained 3.8mg of activeThat's the amount we found. The label says it should be 10 mg. But remember, it is referenced against a standard of testosterone and is probably close, within 20% of that value. We would need a pure standard of the substance to be closer.
04-11-2007, 10:40 AM
Thanks for posting the results Mike even though I'll have to wait to see what the hell it all means other than the basic stuff that's already been mentioned.
To everyone in this thread remember to keep it clean and discuss results etc without it getting dirty.
04-11-2007, 10:51 AM
Come on Dr. D, you're looking at the thread, no response?
04-11-2007, 10:53 AM
04-11-2007, 11:05 AM
04-11-2007, 11:05 AM
I haven't opened my bottle of Epistane yet... I wonder if I should take twice the dose as others. Or since everybody got their results on probably the same amount - maybe I shouldn't? Any thoughts on that? Thats my only question...
If everybody has had around 8mg per serving (2 caps) - with great results.. Maybe I should just stick to that...
04-11-2007, 11:07 AM
It all depends on how comfortable you are eating mystery meat, Zero.
04-11-2007, 11:09 AM
I don't like mystery meat... or mystery supplements.
04-11-2007, 11:13 AM
IBE sent that letter out to distributors claiming Havoc was 60% pure and their's was 95%. I'm curious what lab they used. This lab didn't have the standard for it. It has been over 2 weeks now and we're still waiting on a "coc" letter. If you notice in this report, the COC is clearly addressed so I me thinks IBE never had a third party test.
04-11-2007, 11:15 AM
This is a solid report on Epi and there's nothing to argue really. Also, remember that the low mg/cap is an "estimated amount" in the words of the lab that made this report, because it is not a real number but rather an extrapolated value based off a different standard. That means error is to be expected necessarily without a true reference standard to calculate from. More importantly, an internal standard is required in order to really quantitate anything. Without the % recovery from an internal, surrogate standard doped in both the blank injection and the sample injection, you have no idea what the system efficiency is anyway, so take that with a serious grain of salt and Alston would tell you the same thing if you contacted him. That number means squat and Mike is only trying to make it seem important so he doesn't look like a total ass (too late for that though) at this point after all this drama and no proof of anything now.
Nice try Mike, but you still didn't prove a damn thing was wrong with Epi. Now if you're smart, you'll move on and pray to God that IBE doesn't decide to blow the whistles on all your little buddies with their crappy results that don't even come close to the ones you posted for Epi. If you keep on after this though, you will get what you deserve, believe that.
04-11-2007, 11:20 AM
PA tested your product and came out with a MW of 270. He tested the other two products, which are to contain the exact same ingredient and came up with 288. I test your product and come up with 270. Now, if PA tested the three products all the same way and came up with 2 different results (288 being the explainable number), why is yours coming up 270 (which has no logical explanation)?
04-11-2007, 11:23 AM
didnt it say within 20%?
how does a lab even get a standard of pure legit stuff to test to?thats an honest question as im wondering?threats,anger,condem nation..how very VERY 'christian' of you.i am sickened by hypocritical 'christian' or other religious bull****ters such as yourself.
so its turn the other cheek,or an eye for an eye,depending on the situation eh?PLEASE REFRAIN FROM PERSONAL ATTACKS.
in regards to the majority of your post as a whole.
Last edited by yeahright; 04-12-2007 at 12:46 PM.
04-11-2007, 11:25 AM
If he can give a logical reason for why his product comes out with a 270MW when the other two compounds come out with a 288MW, then everything should be fine. Nobody I've spoken with, outside of an IBE employee, can explain how a compound with a 270MW CAN be epistane. If he can explain that, then the results will support their claim
04-11-2007, 11:26 AM
This test makes a strong case for Epistane being greatly impure. If that is not actually the situation, IBE and co. would be well advised to make a contrary argument that is at least as strong. Hand-waving about reading between the lines of 10 page locked threads is not such an argument.
04-11-2007, 11:28 AM
Seems like a little going on 'round here.
I hope good prevails.
04-11-2007, 11:29 AM
288 is the molecular weight of testosterone BTW, a controlled substance that does not belong in a dietary supp. That ion is NOT in the IBE product and not my concern, that's somebody else's nightmare!
RTP already said they could not id 270 so who cares what PA says? He admitted to having no standard also.
04-11-2007, 11:32 AM
D, here is a simple question:
Can you give a logical explanation for why your product has a MW of 270? Given that a MW of 288 can be explained and justified as the correct compound. Both threads will end as soon as you can explain this. There will be no fighting after that.
04-11-2007, 11:33 AM
04-11-2007, 11:33 AM
04-11-2007, 11:34 AM
04-11-2007, 11:35 AM
04-11-2007, 11:37 AM
I think its time for IBE to make a rebuttal consisting of their test results/info/official statement
04-11-2007, 11:38 AM
Don't say you weren't warned.
04-11-2007, 11:41 AM
For those that wonder about the 288 reference, as PA stated:
yes the results for havoc show that the stuff contains a compuond that has a MW of 288. 288 is the correct MW for the methylepistanol (it desulfurizes in the injection port to give 288)
So the compound starts out with a higher MW, but when it desulfurizes in the injection port, it goes to 288.
04-11-2007, 11:41 AM
04-11-2007, 11:43 AM
I have two meetings to go to, won't be back till after 5pm. I'm sure I'll have 50 pages to read by then
04-11-2007, 11:48 AM
ok interesting.so how does 288 correlate necessarily to the true product in question if its for test.i realize they have similarities as anabolic compounds but im just tryin to understand how that works is all...
and similar q on the 277 mw.how is it correlated to the proper product?
how is a pure standard nto available anywhere for a legit pure product?again,admitadly clueless,just geniunely curious
04-11-2007, 11:53 AM
Man you can't even admit it when your wrong. WEAK! Glad I bought Havoc and didn't buy your bottle of mystery powder.
Maybe later today we can play guess the active ingredient.
We have for players: Mass Tabs, Ripped Tabs, Methoxy-Trn, Methoxy TST, and now Epistane!
Winner gets a half eaten protein bar.
04-11-2007, 11:56 AM
Remember to keep the personal attacks out of the thread. Discuss and debate the results as much as you want.
As an observation: The user reports of reduced or eliminated gyno after using Epistane really cannot be ignored. There are so many of them spread across different boards from experienced users who have credibility in their various online communities. I don't understand the science of these test results enough to contribute anything meaningful about what they say about Epistane....but SOMETHING unusually positive comes from this product. Precisely as predicted by the structure of the compound.
I'll leave it for others more knowledgeable to debate the test results.
04-11-2007, 11:57 AM
This whole situation has really soured me on using anthing like epi, havoc, superdrol, or anything except what goes in a syringe from my trusted guy. Who knows what is in these pills? You just have to trust.
I understand D's frustration, and as a Christian myself, Christianity does not remove frustration or anger.
Why do we care? We eat crap all the time and beta test things all the time and have no idea what is in them. No one has said anything bad about the results from either supp. There are risks taking this stuff...deal with it. I have seen many in both these threads who have jumped on beta testing without wanting to know the purity or MW of the prod they test..why bother with it now. If it is impure, do you think it just became that way? Do you think all supps are "pure"? Hell, the stuff is made in garages in some cases. None of this is pure cause we aren't rich enough to have it that good. And if you were, you would be too busy to be adding fuel to this fire.
I am not subscribin to this thread and am done talking about or reading about this slap fight. Both parties are being asses, and one in particular seems to have an agenda and I will not further it by reading this crud. It should be locked, this forum is not a qualified place to have this discussion. What it will do is cause forum-hysteria.
Good luck to both of you. you probably won't stop the pickin at each other thing, but I hope one of you just man's up and walks away..no net war has ever been won in the real world.
04-11-2007, 11:57 AM
04-11-2007, 12:01 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By 1Fast400 in forum SupplementsReplies: 41Last Post: 04-11-2007, 12:04 PM
- By WATERLOGGED in forum AnabolicsReplies: 34Last Post: 01-29-2004, 10:28 PM
- By ex_banana-eater in forum SupplementsReplies: 14Last Post: 10-19-2003, 06:22 AM
- By TheTom in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 09-16-2003, 01:31 PM
- By GangstaJDog in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-24-2003, 04:26 PM