Epistane testing results

Page 2 of 15 First 1234 ... Last

  1. Quote Originally Posted by DR.D View Post
    OK Mike, I can see you want to keep pushing, but don't say you weren't warned! I do not appreciate you trying to keep wasting my time like this.

    288 is the molecular weight of testosterone BTW, a controlled substance that does not belong in a dietary supp. That ion is NOT in the IBE product and not my concern, that's somebody else's nightmare!

    RTP already said they could not id 270 so who cares what PA says? He admitted to having no standard also.
    So, are you saying there could be testosterone in the other products which have a MW of 288?



  2. Quote Originally Posted by Nabeshin View Post
    This test makes a strong case for Epistane being greatly impure. If that is not actually the situation, IBE and co. would be well advised to make a contrary argument that is at least as strong. Hand-waving about reading between the lines of 10 page locked threads is not such an argument.
    I have a better idea, you are well advised just don't use Epi. Or don't be so lazy. The data is posted. Do you think I made it up? I put the number there days before this report even came out so how could I! It hasn't been edited either. It's the same result as this one. READ.
    •   
       


  3. Quote Originally Posted by 1Fast400 View Post
    D, here is a simple question:

    Can you give a logical explanation for why your product has a MW of 270? Given that a MW of 288 can be explained and justified as the correct compound.
    How do we know that 288 is the *correct* compound. All I've heard so far is that NOBODY has a standard to compare to. Maybe I'm misguided.

  4. Quote Originally Posted by DR.D View Post
    No you don't! I already broke it down days ago how the 270 ion is generated in the thread that got closed. ...
    Don't act like you can't read Mike. I explained it already, days ago.

  5. I think its time for IBE to make a rebuttal consisting of their test results/info/official statement
    •   
       


  6. Quote Originally Posted by DR.D View Post
    OK Mike, I can see you want to keep pushing, but don't say you weren't warned! I do not appreciate you trying to keep wasting my time like this.
    We want to keep pushing. We do not appreciate you trying to keep wasting our time, money, and health, not to mention putting a giant political bullseye on the back of the industry in general. We do not trust you anymore, so don't expect us to accept an explanation that requires trusting you. And if you alienate us by shadowboxing around a straight answer to the legitimate concerns we have, then our lack of patronage alone will be enough to bury you.

    Don't say you weren't warned.

  7. For those that wonder about the 288 reference, as PA stated:

    yes the results for havoc show that the stuff contains a compuond that has a MW of 288. 288 is the correct MW for the methylepistanol (it desulfurizes in the injection port to give 288)

    So the compound starts out with a higher MW, but when it desulfurizes in the injection port, it goes to 288.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Nabeshin View Post
    We want to keep pushing. We do not appreciate you trying to keep wasting our time, money, and health, not to mention putting a giant political bullseye on the back of the industry in general. We do not trust you anymore, so don't expect us to accept an explanation that requires trusting you. And if you alienate us by shadowboxing around a straight answer to the legitimate concerns we have, then our lack of patronage alone will be enough to bury you.

    Don't say you weren't warned.


    The community has spoken!

  9. I have two meetings to go to, won't be back till after 5pm. I'm sure I'll have 50 pages to read by then

  10. ok interesting.so how does 288 correlate necessarily to the true product in question if its for test.i realize they have similarities as anabolic compounds but im just tryin to understand how that works is all...

    and similar q on the 277 mw.how is it correlated to the proper product?

    how is a pure standard nto available anywhere for a legit pure product?again,admitadly clueless,just geniunely curious

    Quote Originally Posted by DR.D View Post
    OK Mike, I can see you want to keep pushing, but don't say you weren't warned! I do not appreciate you trying to keep wasting my time like this.

    288 is the molecular weight of testosterone BTW, a controlled substance that does not belong in a dietary supp. That ion is NOT in the IBE product and not my concern, that's somebody else's nightmare!

    RTP already said they could not id 270 so who cares what PA says? He admitted to having no standard also.

  11. Quote Originally Posted by DR.D View Post
    I have a better idea, you are well advised just don't use Epi. Or don't be so lazy. The data is posted. Do you think I made it up? I put the number there days before this report even came out so how could I! It hasn't been edited either. It's the same result as this one. READ.

    Man you can't even admit it when your wrong. WEAK! Glad I bought Havoc and didn't buy your bottle of mystery powder.

    Maybe later today we can play guess the active ingredient.

    We have for players: Mass Tabs, Ripped Tabs, Methoxy-Trn, Methoxy TST, and now Epistane!

    Winner gets a half eaten protein bar.

  12. Remember to keep the personal attacks out of the thread. Discuss and debate the results as much as you want.

    As an observation: The user reports of reduced or eliminated gyno after using Epistane really cannot be ignored. There are so many of them spread across different boards from experienced users who have credibility in their various online communities. I don't understand the science of these test results enough to contribute anything meaningful about what they say about Epistane....but SOMETHING unusually positive comes from this product. Precisely as predicted by the structure of the compound.

    I'll leave it for others more knowledgeable to debate the test results.

  13. This whole situation has really soured me on using anthing like epi, havoc, superdrol, or anything except what goes in a syringe from my trusted guy. Who knows what is in these pills? You just have to trust.
    I understand D's frustration, and as a Christian myself, Christianity does not remove frustration or anger.
    Why do we care? We eat crap all the time and beta test things all the time and have no idea what is in them. No one has said anything bad about the results from either supp. There are risks taking this stuff...deal with it. I have seen many in both these threads who have jumped on beta testing without wanting to know the purity or MW of the prod they test..why bother with it now. If it is impure, do you think it just became that way? Do you think all supps are "pure"? Hell, the stuff is made in garages in some cases. None of this is pure cause we aren't rich enough to have it that good. And if you were, you would be too busy to be adding fuel to this fire.

    I am not subscribin to this thread and am done talking about or reading about this slap fight. Both parties are being asses, and one in particular seems to have an agenda and I will not further it by reading this crud. It should be locked, this forum is not a qualified place to have this discussion. What it will do is cause forum-hysteria.

    Good luck to both of you. you probably won't stop the pickin at each other thing, but I hope one of you just man's up and walks away..no net war has ever been won in the real world.

  14. Quote Originally Posted by juggernaut333 View Post
    didnt it say within 20%?

    how does a lab even get a standard of pure legit stuff to test to?thats an honest question as im wondering?threats,anger,condem nation..how very VERY 'christian' of you.i am sickened by hypocritical 'christian' or other religious bull****ters such as yourself.
    so its turn the other cheek,or an eye for an eye,depending on the situation eh?jesus would ***** slap u

    in regards to the majority of your post as a whole.
    That's it. I'm out.

  15. Quote Originally Posted by DR.D View Post
    That's it. I'm out.
    Yeah, that was pretty outta line.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by yeahright View Post
    As an observation: The user reports of reduced or eliminated gyno after using Epistane really cannot be ignored. There are so many of them spread across different boards from experienced users who have credibility in their various online communities. I don't understand the science of these test results enough to contribute anything meaningful about what they say about Epistane....but SOMETHING unusually positive comes from this product. Precisely as predicted by the structure of the compound.

    I'll leave it for others mor eknowledgeable to debate the test results.
    I agree. I myself wonder what these tests mean, but I can't help but acknowledge what Epistane has done for me in terms of gyno reduction.

  17. Attack the information, not the person. This will not keep getting repeated. I'm here looking for information just like the rest of you and I also want clear cut answers but attacking someone's religion or anything else for that matter besides their statements gets us nowhere.

  18. Bobo has equipped all mods with the ban stick. Keep this discussion civil ladies and gentlemen.
  19. Guest
    Guest's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayhawkk View Post
    Attack the information, not the person. This will not keep getting repeated. I'm here looking for information just like the rest of you and I also want clear cut answers but attacking someone's religion or anything else for that matter besides their statements gets us nowhere.
    I was attacked at another board. Jacob you suck, I hate you, but your products work so I was like okay.

  20. So, results are posted. And, now, with 44 members viewing the thread, both the OP (1Fast) and the defendant (Dr. D) skip town.

    Great.

  21. Quote Originally Posted by ShakesAllDay View Post
    So, results are posted. And, now, with 44 members viewing the thread, both the OP (1Fast) and the defendant (Dr. D) skip town.

    Great.
    D had a reason though, this isnt the first thread he has been personally attacked in, even only counting the last week hes had a rough time, and i would really hate to see what his PM box looks like.

    anyway, regarding all of this stuff, why would IBE say things about Havoc being impure, when their stuff was?

    it doesnt make sense, there is no way they would be dumb enough to think noone would test it.

    the arguing back and forth over the last couple weeks has resulted in alot of "prove it is!" and "no, you prove it isnt!" which doesnt get anybody anywhere.

    and these tests dont really prove anything do they?

    i mean, if the product is somehow less potent or less effective than the company says, and people are still making great gains from it, and even getting some other benefits (gyno reduction) there must be some good things about it.

    i dont know, the controversy kind of makes me want to buy Epistane (my cart at a site has 2 bottles of Havoc in it im waiting to order, but that may change) i dont know which is "better" "more pure" or "contains magical unicorns" but the logs dont lie (logs...on here, not toilet logs) and people are enjoying using both Havoc and Epistane, so something must be good about both.

  22. I haven't gone anywhere. I love my PDA . I'm listening to a boring meeting anyway . So Dr D just left instead of explaining how a MW of 270 makes that active epistane. All because someone made a god reference.

  23. Wow, I just realized how retarded I am.

  24. and these tests dont really prove anything do they?
    Seeing posts like this make me want to bash my head against a wall.

  25. Yes, obviously both havoc and epistane work.

    that being said, i want to know what substance i am ingesting, and i trust the label on a product to tell me what that is.


    This is my understanding of the situation.

    1. no one has a standard to go by (major problem)
    2. 1fast claims the substances orginal MW is over 288 and becomes 288 due to the testing process
    3. Dr D claims that the substance degrades to 270 in this testing process (if i recall correctly, feel free to correct me dr. d.)

    is it possible the same substance can degrade to both 288 and 270 respectively? or that different testing pocesses can degrade the product to either one of these values?

    D. if you are reading this, humor us and explain the situation one more time.

    the fact of the matter is that we now have a test saying epistane has under half the dose it says it does per capsule.

    if this is incorrect, wouldnt it be beneficial for IBE to post results of its own?
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Epistane testing results
    By 1Fast400 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 04-11-2007, 01:04 PM
  2. blood test result and why is my test so low?
    By WATERLOGGED in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 01-29-2004, 11:28 PM
  3. r-ALA testing results
    By ex_banana-eater in forum Supplements
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-19-2003, 07:22 AM
  4. Methyl-1-test results
    By TheTom in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-16-2003, 02:31 PM
  5. Injectable 1-Test results?
    By GangstaJDog in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-24-2003, 05:26 PM
Log in
Log in