NCAA spread time
- 10-22-2006, 11:23 PM
Originally Posted by WannaBeHulk
- 10-22-2006, 11:49 PM
Originally Posted by Iron Warrior
im calling navy over notre dame. ND has got to be the most overrated team (maybe USC). triple option will be all over the ND defense. why is brady quinn even in the heisman running? if either spread is over 14 (i think that is a probable spread for tomorrow), ill be throwing down mega bucks.
10-22-2006, 11:54 PM
Yeah, the Cryin Irish fooled the crap out of me. I thought UCLA would keel over on the road because PAC-10 defenses are average at best (except USC) and expected Notre Dame to put up at least 30 points. I was thinking 31-14 Notre Dame but it ended at 20-17.Originally Posted by WannaBeHulk
10-23-2006, 12:05 AM
i think we both have gambling problems wait a minute... its not a problem if youre winning! WOOOOOOOOO!!! sounds like youre doing well in the game, and im up $1200 for the season although this weekend was a bit of a scare. it was like a roller coaster ride but i ended with my money back plus some all cause that over spread. thanks again for that one! sports gambling is such a rush placing hundreds of $$ on any given game.Originally Posted by Iron Warrior
10-23-2006, 02:02 AM
im thinking cowboys money line is a lock. i just heard on sportscenter that dallas is 6-1 against NY on monday night football and TO is 5-0 against NY.Originally Posted by Iron Warrior
or taking dallas in the 1st half would be a good bet IMO. NY usually doesnt get rolling til the 4th quarter. any thoughts on this?
10-23-2006, 09:24 PM
Well, my pick is looking good now. Giants are up 12-0 (with the spread it's 15-0) and driving inside the Dallas 20. If they cover the over then I'm up $650 this weekOriginally Posted by WannaBeHulk
BTW, We don't have a gambling problem, we are just unique investors
Here to edit my post, the G-Men pulled it off and they smashed the over. My W-L may not be impressive but I ended up $650 for the week largely in part to a meaningless touchdown late in the Minnesota-Seattle game
PS. I know ESPN mentioned that but past performance is a poor indicator of future performance, especially with the way NFL rosters change now a day
Last edited by Iron Warrior; 10-24-2006 at 12:18 AM.
10-24-2006, 01:38 AM
thats so true, and ive heard it so many times in my business classes. great call on the MNF game! i had dallas in the first half so i lost but still am up for the week. that bet almost came through but bledsoe had to throw a pick (thats for bledsoe).Originally Posted by Iron Warrior
checking the spreads, navy is +14. i dont think notre dame has beaten anybody by more than 14, maybe penn state. but this is at navy. i cant find the fresno/boise line yet. ill probably buy 1/2 put and take navy for a couple hundred. $$$ in the bank
10-24-2006, 01:46 AM
i llike a lot of bets this week. other teams i like for the week and will ix and match in parlays or teasers most likely:
mizzou -2.5 over oklahoma
oregon state +12.5 against USC
texas A&M -5 over baylor
miami +6 against georgia tech (depending on reggie balls health. if hes healthy, by game time then miami's in trouble)
and my favorite: tennessee -4.5 over south carolina
what do you guys think about any of these picks?
10-25-2006, 05:23 PM
any thoughts on tonights game: clemson @ v tech. clemson is favored -4.5 and i honestly dont know who to pick but wanna throw down some $$$ for entertainment purposes. if i had to pick, id take v tech but i do best betting in the big 10 and big 12. who would you guys take?
10-25-2006, 07:02 PM
I am concerned about Clemson b/c Davis may not play and Fry is finished. Davis is listed as probable but on Oct. 24 Bowden said he is 50/50 to play.
Bowden: "Speaking of James, he practiced yesterday but did not do anything. I'd say he's 50-50. It's probably a game day decision on whether or play or not. Reggie Merriweather is 100%. It's the same shoulder."
Still, I think Clemson is better on both sides of the ball. Only positives I can see find for VT are that Clemson has been slightly sloppy with special teams and VT is a thurs. night money maker at home.
10-25-2006, 09:02 PM
this is a really great analysis. it makes a lot of sense on paper that clemson appears to have the edge.Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
that being said, i already placed my bet on v tech. i feel that clemson beat the hell out of a sloppy georgia tech with an unhealthy/injured reggie ball and he brought the team down with him. since this happened, i think it influenced this weeks spread. v tech also knows they cant afford another loss if they want hopes at a BCS bowl (is there an ACC championship game?). im also hoping the questionable clemson players are sidelined. v tech being at home is a great time to bounce back and prove themselves against a solid clemson team.
i think this one is pretty much a crap shoot.
10-25-2006, 09:19 PM
I love the Tennessee -4.5 OVE the fake USC, I'm betting on that oneOriginally Posted by WannaBeHulk
Florida -1.5 OVER Georgia
Tampa Bay +9 OVER NY Giants
Indianapolis +2.5 OVER Denver
UCLA -1 OVER Washington State
Iowa -16 OVER Northern Illinois
The OVER (42.5) in the Eagles-Jaguars game
Vanderbilt -9.5 OVER Duke
NY Jets +1.5 OVER Cleveland
The OVER in the Ohio St & Minnesota game (48 pts.)
My lock is New England -2.5 OVER Minnesota. If I hit this one, the others don't matter
10-26-2006, 01:30 AM
RD, about what percent of your picks to nail ? What do you think of handicapping in other sports like basketball, hockey, & baseball ? There could be a lot of $$$ made in those sports because they play so many games in comparison to football teams.
10-26-2006, 10:30 AM
I base most of my analysis on statistics and trends. This, to me, is more logical than anything else. I try to adjust for injuries but it is difficult to put a numerical value on the loss or addition of a player. I attempt to leave off all values that are not quantitatively measurable. This often means that certain types of games I stay away from such as rivalry games that often have more emotion.
College football is what I am strongest at.
10-26-2006, 12:00 PM
so you wouldnt put a wager on tennessee/south carolina then being a rivalry game? i definitely think tennessee will cover 4.5 points. south carolina is a tough call call because they are very inconsistnet but i feel this will happen even if SC is at the top of their game. i just look for the games that are braodcasted on TV and bet on those games mostly so i can watch and make it fun. i need ESPN gameplan for more variety thoughOriginally Posted by size
10-26-2006, 04:40 PM
For me, I would not take this game. UT looks solid and to be the better play but SC is not a bad team. As you mentioned they suffer from inconsistency which also makes it a tougher game to call. If SC can play like they did against Auburn then I think it will be close, if not then I think Tenn wins on a big day from Ainge. Problem is, which SC team shows up.Originally Posted by WannaBeHulk
However, if you see something you like then you should take the play.
10-26-2006, 06:15 PM
ok, the UT/SC spread is now -3.5 so it dropped a full point. this is huge cause now ill probably buy a point and take tennessee for a hefty wager. my only concern is that erik ainge had a bad game against bama so im a little worried he wont respond well to that. i think UT will undoubtedly win but the covering the spread was in question. ill feel safe bringing it down to 2.5. if they do win like i believe they will, chances are it will be by at least a field goal.Originally Posted by size
all my other picks have changed for the worse though. i liked navy +14 and now its +13. oregon state opened at +13 and is now +11. miami +6 to +5. oh, and i just noticed this one: wake forest -8.5 over UNC. what do you guys think? seems really good to me.
size and RD, who are your picks for the week?
10-26-2006, 09:24 PM
Keep this in mind when you pay attention to baseball. There is this gambling strategy that many people use when teams playing .600 ball or better play against teams below .500 after 30 games in the season. The strategy is to bet on the team with the higher winning percentage the first game, if they lose go double or nothing the next game, if they lose go double or nothing the third (and usually) final game of the series because there's a 90% probability that the team with the .600 winning percentage doesn't get swept. Look into it next seasonOriginally Posted by Rogue Drone
10-26-2006, 09:26 PM
I'd stay clear from Miami at this point. They have some psychological issues.Originally Posted by WannaBeHulk
10-26-2006, 09:31 PM
true, but larry coker knows his job is on the line and has to find any way to win.Originally Posted by Iron Warrior
on a side note, go hokies!!! i got clemson -2 for the 2nd half to cover my first bet. so i either win big with both bets or come out a little ahead if my 2nd half bet fails
10-26-2006, 09:46 PM
10-26-2006, 09:46 PM
I don't know that I'd bet on Miami straight up. But - a 5 point spread might be a good idea.
Reggie Ball is a bad QB. Period. He can lose a game by himself - and we proved against VTech that we can win with a bad offense with defensive points.
I see GT winning by 3 points - something like 13-10 (last year it was 14-10 or so, GT).
I think it's a good idea to take Miami at +5 or 6 - any less, maybe not - not sure it will be all that close.
On UT-S Carolina - UT is damn good. Ainge had a bad week against Bama. And he's fully capable of that - he's an idiot QB. But - I gotta think Cutcliff turns it back around. I think he wants to dig it to Spurrier.
As Size points out - you never know what S Carolina team will show up - and Spurrier seems to have Fulmer's number.
At UT -3, probably a good pick.
Lastly - UNC is TERRIBLE. I think Wake beats them by 2 TD's.
(Doesn't look good with VT up 17-7 over Clemson, eh?)
10-27-2006, 02:29 AM
cool, i would love any tips. i know to bet on spreads earlier rather than later but i kinda shot myself in the foot by doing that last week. i got texas -6.5 then it changed to -4 two days later. thats huge!!!Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
i like your methodology, it has much more merit than mine. i analyze the most recent games and factor in momentum or emotional/team issues. i dont take home field advantage into consideration too much as i feel the environment in college doesnt make nearly as much difference as in the pros. since some stadiums are really tough to play in, i do account for those few. im also bias to bet on my favorite teams. luckily, ohio state has covered every spread except NIU.
i do this purely for entertainment, not to make money. my winnings/losings are linked to my supplement budget so if i do well, i buy more/higher quality supps. if i lose, ill be more economical in my supp spending. its a great system!
10-27-2006, 09:31 AM
Yes, I use a simple moving average and I also use a weighted one. However, this is just one thing as I do not think alone it works. I look alot at ATS trends and I have a spread equation that I use to see where I think the spread should fall. On trends, I put a much higher value on trends that are in the current year as opposed to previous years. I also look for common factors between teams such as common teams played.Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
For this weekend, one game I really like is BYU (-7.5).
10-27-2006, 11:29 AM
thats funny cause i was gonna post that i didnt feel as comfortable with the navy bet after hearing charlie weiss being pissed at the BCS standings. i do think if they can, and thats a big IF, they will indeed run up the score to prove a point. me and you were on the same page on this one.Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
all your stat principles are very impressive. unfortunately, i didnt continue with stat classes as far as i wouldve liked because this is excellant info. keep the pointers coming please, im all ears oh, and nice webpage, definitely a useful tool.
Similar Forum Threads
- By Big Joe in forum Weight LossReplies: 38Last Post: 10-01-2012, 11:19 PM
- By TruffleShuffle in forum Nutrition / HealthReplies: 2Last Post: 12-26-2010, 03:28 PM
- By jamze7417 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 05-01-2008, 11:31 AM
- By CEDeoudes59 in forum Sports TalkReplies: 227Last Post: 12-04-2007, 04:59 PM
- By bigbadboss101 in forum General ChatReplies: 0Last Post: 10-20-2002, 12:48 PM