View Poll Results: 4 more years for Bush? if he could.
- 267. This poll is closed
Dumb Question- If Bush Could Run Again, Would You Vote For Him?
- 05-18-2007, 11:31 PM
- 05-19-2007, 09:10 AM
your input to these threads as all opinions have value. It is more honest to make statements based upon what you believe as opposed to what you think won't offend anyone!
Here is Bush addressing the Gonzales - Ashcroft incident
[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0HEKTr6wrc"]YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.[/nomedia]
"Hey, I am doing what has to be done" !!!
05-30-2007, 10:24 AM
05-30-2007, 01:23 PM
Bush is a bastard, I can not BELIEVE people on here would even consider voting him back in. He's so ignorant. Even Tenant said Bush was dead set on war for no apparent reason, no matter the intel. Terrorism is a problem and always has been but you can not fight evil with more evil.
War does NOT = Freedom! And that is coming from someone who's grandparents and dad all fought in either the Korean war and/or Vietnam. I was raised to be a "military brat" my whole life. I loved playing GI Joe and wanted to be a pilot in the Air Force when I grew up. I will gladly die for our freedom and the life of loved ones, but I will not die because our leaders view me as a pawn in their personal vendetta.
05-30-2007, 01:34 PM
I wish candidates really cared as much as they pretend to. It's now a war of who has the most money and thus popularity in order to get into office. How democratic is that? Once they are in office, they have that selective memory for what they promised us they would do. Nobody does a damn thing about population control and the severe damage we have already done to our planet. We will pay in the coming years for all we have done. Even scientists are seeing disturbing trends. No "messiah" is coming to save us and fix the **** we have done, it's all on us. People need to see this before we can move forward.
05-30-2007, 05:21 PM
05-30-2007, 11:02 PM
05-31-2007, 06:49 AM
05-31-2007, 09:01 PM
06-01-2007, 11:01 PM
06-14-2007, 12:16 PM
Bush Is The Man, He Stands Up For What He Believes And Doesn't Change His Mind On Issues Cause It Might Not Be Popular. I Voted For Him The First 2 Times And I Would Do It Again If I Could.
06-14-2007, 03:01 PM
06-14-2007, 08:56 PM
I don't think that ignoring the will of the majority of the population and just doing whatever you want is a virtue. I call that being a dictator.
06-14-2007, 10:05 PM
06-14-2007, 10:24 PM
06-14-2007, 10:37 PM
06-14-2007, 11:12 PM
I think you have a skewed image of what patriotism is. You also don't seem to like to do your own thinking. Neither will get you anywhere, but to each his own.
Its also funny how you lump "big muscular guys" into some ridiculous stereotype. You must live in tv land. Been to Green Acres lately?
06-14-2007, 11:26 PM
06-15-2007, 12:55 AM
06-15-2007, 01:00 AM
06-15-2007, 01:08 AM
06-15-2007, 01:11 AM
06-15-2007, 01:12 AM
06-15-2007, 03:32 AM
06-15-2007, 08:12 AM
John Kerry and Al Gore were designated losers. They along with Bob Dole existed only to create the illusion that there was a choice!
Al Gore was not endorsed by Bill Clinton, how embarrassing after 8 years of being Clinton's vice president!!! Loser !
John Kerry both George Bush's cousin and Fraternity mate!
WTF out of 300 million people Bush runs against his own cousin !
Kerry let the Bush people make him out to be the "coward" in the campaign even though he was actually in Vietnam, while Bush was.., well nobody is really sure where? something about missing records!
Kerry spent 20 million dollars on anti voter fraud systems, then conceded the election with out even considering the Ohio ballots !! WTF !!!
06-15-2007, 10:52 AM
06-15-2007, 10:59 AM
You can't win with no success condition. WInning means achieving success. We haven't defined what success is so how can we ever achieve it.
Additionally we are NOT in a war. We have not been to war since WWII. Military action, yes, but not war. There IS A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Heck, we havent' even defined an opponent in this "war."
And how can you say he was trying to divert attention with cruise missiles when he was launching them at Osama Bin Laden. His intelligence reports made a mistake. The SAME MISTAKE THAT BUSH MADE AT TH START OF THE IRAQ INVASION.
At the start of the Iraq invasion, Bush ordered the bombing of a farm on a river in Iraq. His intel said Saddam was vacationing there. His intel also said tehre was a bunker there. So he had 2 stealth bombers go in and drop bunker busters on the farm.
It turns out that the only people there at the time were a bunch of servants, no one else. Approximately 500 people there, most of them killed in the blast. And what they thought was a bunker turned out to jsut be a winecellar. Nice. To top it off, because of that bombing, it compeltely blew our surprise advantage in the invasion. Plus it gave Saddam extra time to escape. Awesome job.
06-15-2007, 11:52 AM
Empty rhetoric. Typical, "if you don't follow Bush without question, the terrorists win!"Your words support an enemy who kidnaps babies, executes them, then booby traps their little bodies so their grieving parents have their arms blown up when they retrieve their dead baby's body.
The most UNAmerican thing anyone cna ever do is obey without question.
I invoke Godwin's LawThe simple fact is we stopped the next Adolph Hitler *SNIP*
No you only see the underbelly, you don't see the real world, you see the worst side of the world and nothing else.I do have a 15 year military career, a Secret Security Clearance (recently relinquished when I was discharged LAST WEEK--YAHOO!!!), and a lot of real life experience. Those of us who see the world for what it is understand we have to do what we have to do. Or there will be no "Land of the Free".
BTW, it never was "free".
Again, rhetoric. You see things in black and white. Us against them even when you don't even know who the heck "them" is. You'd rather shoot first and ask questionis later. You ignore all the things which actually cause terrorism in the first place. You ignore the conditions which allow increases in recruitment by terrorist groups.Sometimes one must climb down from the Ivory Tower and get their hands dirty. And bloody.
Combatting terrorism through police action worked for 200 years. The use of military blunt force is now proving to not only be ineffective, but to actually contribute to increased enrollment in terrorist groups and increase the number of terrorist which are more likely to target the US specifically. THAT is directly from our very own CIA.
06-15-2007, 12:27 PM
Terrorists are small individual cells and camps. You cannot fight those with a big lumbering conventional army."Police Action" told me all I needed to see to understand your position. And you simply are not qualified, by what you write, to comment on military science. I am.
Never said you murder innocents, just said that blindly agreeing with the President or administration without question is UNAMERICAN. Even more UnAmerican is demanding others do the same.Please do not make me out to be an evil person who would murder innocents--that is what the terrorists you support do. My morals, ethics and kindess are not in question here on this Board, I hope.
Appeal to Fear fallacyIn the meantime, remember this: these people would walk up to you and cut your throat in an instant. You cannot use reason against unreasonable people. How do you spell "Koombyah"? LOL You can only defend that which is yours, and that which you believe in.
06-15-2007, 12:42 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By sonofsatan666 in forum Post Cycle TherapyReplies: 1Last Post: 11-08-2006, 01:56 AM
- By BigVrunga in forum General ChatReplies: 41Last Post: 08-23-2006, 10:04 AM
- By ripped22 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 04-18-2006, 06:20 PM
- By CROWLER in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 46Last Post: 12-16-2005, 06:30 PM
- By WAHCHING in forum Weight LossReplies: 5Last Post: 09-21-2005, 04:05 PM