Androhard as an adjunct for TRT/HRT
- 02-10-2011, 10:36 PM
Androhard as an adjunct for TRT/HRT
Alright guys, what are your opinions on using androhard as an adjunct to TRT/HRT? The bioequivalence of Androhard is 191 mg of DHT. Of course, before actually recommending the series we need to see logs, but it's nice to theorize now right? The write-up for the product can be viewed Here.
Just wanted to hear your thoughts on adding DHT to TRT/HRT. I've always been enamored with DHT because, imo, it's the REAL male hormone, not testosterone. It can't aromatise and antagonizes estrogen
What do you guys think about androhard for TRT...Celtic Labs Rep
- 02-11-2011, 12:14 AM
my opinion only and im no expert but others like matrix will chime in. in a sense you are trying to push this on people for trt since it was spoken of in the official write up. there is no way id use this instead of test and i hope thats not what you are trying to convince people here to do. if i was lacking dht per bw id get a script for proviron etc not buy some otc product that is yet to be proven. some people on injectable t dont get a good conversion to dht while others like myself do fine. ive read many times that the creams give a higher conversion to dht though. i know you're just doing your job as a rep but maybe go back to pushing your ph in the anabolics or supplement section.
no disrespect meant
- 02-11-2011, 05:07 AM
just take some proviron instead, cheaper as well i think
02-11-2011, 08:45 AM
I may end up trying it for that. Just the price is rough, and real end amount of DHT depends on your individual level of enzymes, so its iffy. But it might make sense to run alongside a 100mg/wk TRT dosage. Possibly even running androhard at a reduced dosage, as 200mg DHT is pretty hefty.
02-11-2011, 11:39 AM
02-11-2011, 05:28 PM
However, as I said... Adjunct: A thing added to something else as a supplementary rather than an essential part. So yes, not a replacement but a supplement to the testosterone.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but proviron is just very similar structurally to DHT but isn't actual DHT right? Would the difference between DHT and proviron be very big?
I guess this thread is more about the theoretical use, as opposed to the suggestion of use. Until logs come out I would never suggest androhard as part of a medical treatment for low testosterone. I made that clear in the ridiculous ostarine thread... ridiculous imo, atleast.
Celtic Labs Rep
02-11-2011, 10:33 PM
02-12-2011, 12:33 AM
Seriously if the reviews are good I might be willing to give it a try as an addition when somebody else starts stocking it ... you guys don't ship to Australia
02-12-2011, 11:00 AM
02-12-2011, 10:35 PM
02-12-2011, 10:56 PM
02-13-2011, 11:53 AM
02-13-2011, 03:20 PM
a) proviron has no anabolic or androgenic value to bodybuilding (maybe dosage related)
b) 50mg of proviron more or less maxes out conversion internally, higher doses product no change
So although it provides libido assistance and SHBG lowering (and weak AI activity) i'm not sure it is better than a more direct DHT
02-13-2011, 09:17 PM
02-14-2011, 05:38 AM
Funny, I use both.
02-14-2011, 06:09 PM
03-01-2011, 04:35 PM
11-28-2013, 02:40 PM
I'm one of those people who don't convert T to DHT very well, so I've supplemented with DHT based compounds on my own.
I've tried AndroHard, Proviron and Masteron. Androhard was decent, Proviron has little to no effect on me (nothing noticeable at all), Masteron was by far the greatest, even at a low dose....which makese sense as it's an injectable. FWIW, I have no access to injectable DHT, so offering that as an option is great - but not practical as next to nobody will prescribe this and it's next to impossible to find.
Millennium Sport Technologies Representative
www . millenniumsport . net
11-29-2013, 01:21 PM
11-29-2013, 01:22 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By Hurricane15 in forum SupplementsReplies: 23Last Post: 05-09-2010, 11:29 AM
- By Dwight Schrute in forum AnabolicsReplies: 4Last Post: 01-02-2004, 05:52 PM