I truly have no concern as to the justification of a 40% standardization; Primaforce makes quality products, and they may extract as they wish.sorry about the grammar, English is not my mother language so sometimes its hard to pass my messages...
I think you guys understand me though, sorry again
Ok I understand your point and USP can be right but you must admit that there's not enough scientific evidence to show that the lower extracts are better than the highest on joint aid , and this was my point since the beginning cause some guys were saying that:
"above 10% extraction the joint support behavior starts to degrade"
this is an unproven statement, and as I said before why not try both and see what suits better ?
this is a link to a thread where primaforce defend the 40% extract for joint aid:
Primaforce Cissus Update-40% Total Ketosterones/20% 3-Ketosterones - Bodybuilding.com Forums
Look mullet and for end this drama, you guys based your product in research made with lower extracts and I`m glad you did that , you guys were innovative and bring a great compound to the market, this was a wonderful thing to all of us, you have merits on that, but I`m sure you understand that there's a possibility that maybe the highest extracts can work better for some individuals , this is the only message that I`m trying to pass in this thread , I don't like to see statements without a scientific evidence and only after a comparison study between both % , statements like this "above 10% extraction the joint support behavior starts to degrade" can be made...
You were questioning the logic behind a lower standardization, and I told you. All of the in vitro/animal in vivo research I have seen was conducted using a very basic preparations - if we assume (as we all are) that these compounds are eliciting a reparative effect on joints, than necessarily lowering the amount of several compounds in favor of a few is counterintuitive to this postulate.