Anyone know what the BV % is for peanuts?
I eat a crap load and always wondered what the quality of the protein was.
Thanks
I eat a crap load and always wondered what the quality of the protein was.
Thanks
Anyone know what the BV % is for peanuts?
I eat a crap load and always wondered what the quality of the protein was.
Thanks
Thanks for the search. Yeah, I assumed it wasn't that high.
Dang it. Thanks again
Depends on the nut. Nuts dont actually breakdown very well (esp almonds) so they dont provide as much kcal wise and macro wise as the labels state.Thanks for the search. Yeah, I assumed it wasn't that high.
Dang it. Thanks again
Sup J-please elaborate as I'm an Almonds, Peanuts and Hazelnuts freak.Depends on the nut. Nuts dont actually breakdown very well (esp almonds) so they dont provide as much kcal wise and macro wise as the labels state.
Ill add more to this in the morningSup J-please elaborate as I'm an Almonds, Peanuts and Hazelnuts freak.
I know peanuts are the unhealthiest of the bunch (poly:mono ratio) but I ain't gonna lie-I eat the crap out of them.
Probably a little bit of bothSub'd. I'm curious about this as well. I get lots of undigested peanuts ending up in the toilet if I eat a large quantity. I've always wondered if my body is actually getting any micro or macro nutrients from them, or just pushing them through my system lol
Thanks for the bump! I forgot to go back and look up those things for Whacked!Skimmed through this so sorry if this comment is off topic but best nut i would say is macadamian nuts, VERY pricey but so tasty and very healthy
That's very interesting. I'd be interested in giving that a read if you can dig it upThe thing about nuts is that their nutrition content is typically mislabeled and honestly the way we metabolize it is somewhat an anomaly. There was an overfeeding paper a while back that used nuts and the weight change didn't make sense with the caloric intake.
We can measure it with a calorie bomb meter but for some reason it doesn't transfer to humans that well.
I blame Mr. Peanut...he never looked reputable. It all makes sense, now.The thing about nuts is that their nutrition content is typically mislabeled and honestly the way we metabolize it is somewhat an anomaly. There was an overfeeding paper a while back that used nuts and the weight change didn't make sense with the caloric intake.
We can measure it with a calorie bomb meter but for some reason it doesn't transfer to humans that well.
There was an overfeeding paper a while back that used nuts and the weight change didn't make sense with the caloric intake.
Bump.Thanks for the bump! I forgot to go back and look up those things for Whacked!
Im heading to work now so ill look
**** LOL. Ok, ill see if I can find what I was looking for.Bump.
These results substantiate our original hypothesis that an increase in fecal fat excretion in subjects on a diet containing almonds is attributed to intact CWs hindering the digestion of intracellular lipid.
The process by which almond tissue fractures, like all plant tissues, depends on CW strength and cell-cell adhesion (15). Thus, in fruits and vegetables that are crisp or crunchy the process of tissue fracture occurs by cell rupture. However, during cooking and ripening of these plant foods a process of cell separation can occur, which leads to tissue softening, and is attributed
mainly to the weakening of pectic substances involved in cell-cell adhesion (15, 34).
The degradation of the CW can also be significantly influenced by the presence of noncarbohydrate compounds, such as phenolic components (43), which are known also to have strong antioxidant properties (44, 45).
In particular, the CWs were intact and hindered the release of intracellular lipid. Thus, an increase in fecal fat excretion after consumption of an almond-rich diet is primarily attributed to impairment of lipid bioaccessibility, as a result of an intact CW barrier.
Whole peanut consumption led to a greater fecal fat percent of wet weight and energy per gram of feces compared to the PF, PB, PO or a no peanut control diet. The mean energy losses were 153.7 kJ day−1 for P, 78.1 kJ day−1 for PO, 79.6 kJ day−1 for PB and 5.3 kJ day−1 for PF.
And so on.When whole peanuts were consumed, total energy loss increased by 154 kJ compared to the control period while fat energy loss increased by 84 kJ. Thus, fat loss accounts for 54.6% of total energy loss in the feces, while the nature of the remaining 70 kJ or 45% was not characterized. Prior work with almonds documented that intact nut parenchymal cells were lost in the stool.4 Considering the macronutrient composition of peanuts (about 50% fat and 45% carbohydrate and protein) it is possible that the extra 70 kJ excreted came from the protein and carbohydrate components of peanuts (Table 2).
We absorb some, just not all. So the numbers of the packet are not reflective of what you getSo Cliffs are it's not worth it because the come out almost in the same form as they go in?.
That's only with almonds though, correct? Also, when cutting, it sounds like the perfect food to eat, no?We absorb some, just not all. So the numbers of the packet are not reflective of what you get
I would speculate that this is true for all nuts as the mechanism (cell wall) is the same.That's only with almonds though, correct? Also, when cutting, it sounds like the perfect food to eat, no?
I think the studies prove something but underestimate the phenomenon.We absorb some, just not all. So the numbers of the packet are not reflective of what you get