7a-methyl-D-bol (7a-17a-DiMethandrostenolone) maybe on it's way to the market

[ConcreteConny]

this stuff would probably be manufactured from bolasterone. i suppose the issue of the finished product containing residual bolasterone (a controlled substance) may be significant.

 

[madds87]

I would think it would of been similar to m14add.

 

[Patrick Arnold]

I would think it would of been similar to m14add.

clarify

 

[stankyleg]

No release date just yet unfortunately but we will definitely make a big deal of it on the forum when it is on its way.

This is the reply email I just received. He wasn't talking about this forum BTW

 

[henryv]

this stuff would probably be manufactured from bolasterone. i suppose the issue of the finished product containing residual bolasterone (a controlled substance) may be significant.

Upjohn made their "dimethandrostenolone" from bolasterone; I think they used selenium dioxide to introduce the Δ1 double bond.

 

[madds87]

clarify

well if im right, isnt it true m14add was from dbol? & from older posts werent we comparing this "maybe" ph to dbol?

 

[ConcreteConny]

well if im right, isnt it true m14add was from dbol? & from older posts werent we comparing this "maybe" ph to dbol?

It was a precursor to D-Bol if I'm not mistaking

 

[Patrick Arnold]

well if im right, isnt it true m14add was from dbol? & from older posts werent we comparing this "maybe" ph to dbol?

yeah you are right

this compound has the same 1,4-diene structure as dbol and m14add but the similarities end there

 

[Patrick Arnold]

Upjohn made their "dimethandrostenolone" from bolasterone; I think they used selenium dioxide to introduce the Δ1 double bond.

did they discuss pharmacological activity?

 

[henryv]

did they discuss pharmacological activity?

Yeah. I wrote the piece on page 1 based on their research. [link]

 

[henryv]

For whatever reason the refs were cut off. It should say:

References

[1] Beyler et al (1960), Bismethylenedioxy Steroids. III. The Synthesis of 7α- and 7β-Methylhydrocortisones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 170.
[2] Campbell,J.A.,and Babc0ck,J.C. (1965), 7a-Methyltestosterones, a new class of potent anabolic agents, in Hormonal Steroids 2, 59-67

 

[Patrick Arnold]

Yeah. I wrote the piece on page 1 based on their research. [link]

so its strong but not as strong as bolasterone

 

[henryv]

so its strong but not as strong as bolasterone

That was what they reported, yeah.

 

[Joint Fracture]

This would have been a great compound. Unfortunately, looks like Hatch's control act has a good chance of going through.

It's been a hell of a run, but this could wipe out everything available legally. Sad.

:worried:

 

[Joint Fracture]

Bump (just in case anything has been fermenting on the subject).

 

[g0hardorgohom]

Bump (just in case anything has been fermenting on the subject).

They will not start producing this compound.

 

[Joint Fracture]

They will not start producing this compound.

Noted. This compound does look somewhat similar though. Link below is from phf forum:

http://www.prohormoneforum.com/celtic-labs/81939-2-17-methandrostenolone.html

 

[stankyleg]

Noted. This compound does look somewhat similar though. Link below is from phf forum: http://www.prohormoneforum.com/celtic-labs/81939-2-17-methandrostenolone.html

I saw this. It is awesome.

 

[Joint Fracture]

Agreed. Very interesting!

 

[nostrum420]

Did you guys have any specific questions?

 

[Joint Fracture]

Did you guys have any specific questions?

I imagine most would like to know how it compares to standard dball in terms of wet effects and sides.

 

[JD261985]

Did you guys have any specific questions?

Yes I do. When will this be available??

 

[nostrum420]

It's considerably drier than D-bol and it's available now!

 

[stankyleg]

It's considerably drier than D-bol and it's available now!

How's about a 4 week sponsored log with before and after pics?

 

[tcslick]

Interesting! I love D-bol if this is comparable might have to try it

 

[JD261985]

It's considerably drier than D-bol and it's available now!

I don't see it. I see dianodrol but that's not the compound this thread is talking about because the nomeclature is completely different

 

[nostrum420]

I don't see it. I see dianodrol but that's not the compound this thread is talking about because the nomeclature is completely different

The :7-methyl D-bol" proved too dufficult to produce... The compound we're currently discussing can be called "D-bol-oxime"... Just to confuse things a little more we're also working on a 2-methyl-D-Bol...

 

[Joint Fracture]

I've been popping the Dianodrol for 2 weeks now. Seems much less potent than d-ball.

But I was also referring to 2,17-methandrostenolone. Was hoping it would be more similar to standard d-ball.

 

[stankyleg]

I've been popping the Dianodrol for 2 weeks now. Seems much less potent than d-ball. But I was also referring to 2,17-methandrostenolone. Was hoping it would be more similar to standard d-ball.

What's your dosing?

 

[Joint Fracture]

What's your dosing?

Slowly went up to 7 caps (105 mg).

 

[stankyleg]

Slowly went up to 7 caps (105 mg).

Well, the way it was hyped, that should be the equivalent of 70mg of dbol. 15mg of this=10mg of dbol. For me, 60mg of dbol is the sweet spot. Dbol is cheap as ****. I don't really see the point, for me personally.

 

[Joint Fracture]

Well, the way it was hyped, that should be the equivalent of 70mg of dbol. 15mg of this=10mg of dbol. For me, 60mg of dbol is the sweet spot. Dbol is cheap as ****. I don't really see the point, for me personally.

For me it feels the equivalent of 10mg. 40mg of regualr d-ball gives my liver fits, but with this stuff...I don't feel any sides (not saying that's a bad thing, but it gives me the impression it's weaker than sh*t).

 

[abformulations]

Looking to bridge this into Hdrol. Haven't really see any logs on this. It's been out for a while now

 

[g0hardorgohom]

Looking to bridge this into Hdrol. Haven't really see any logs on this. It's been out for a while now

Is it? I don't think so...

 

[abformulations]

Is it? I don't think so...

Yea I think for like two months now if I'm not mistaken.

What have you seen?

 

[g0hardorgohom]

Yea I think for like two months now if I'm not mistaken.

What have you seen?

It's dbol-oxime, not this one.

2a-17a-dbol will be out at some point but ATM it's stuck in the customs.

 

[abformulations]

It's dbol-oxime, not this one. 2a-17a-dbol will be out at some point but ATM it's stuck in the customs.

Opppps lol. My bad. Thanx for clarification

 

[JD261985]

It's dbol-oxime, not this one. 2a-17a-dbol will be out at some point but ATM it's stuck in the customs.

It's here......