Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

SUPERDROL pulse or not?

GaryMan

GaryMan

New member
Pulse Superdrol 3 times a week pre workout for 6 weeks or straight dose 10mg daily for 4-5 weeks? Thoughts? Experience or opinions?
 
ive never done it or suggests it .. and also have seen pple do it here with great results and one had horrible recovery time which is expected.

there should be a log from way back in the day if you search it .. i prefer someone to just run it and get off asap and jump into pct
 
Smont said:
I don't know what's worse, the question or the answer
Click to expand...
So what's wrong with the question? Mike Arnold has stated pulsing Superdrol is superior. Some have argued for it, some against it. I just wanted different opinions or experiences. I would argue your response was completely useless and offered zero value.
 
istockphoto-954809842-170667a~2.webp
 
3 weeks of anything will give you a temporary bump in water and glycogen stores. Nothing “sticks” in that short of a time span…building lasting muscle takes a long time and consistency over a very long period
 
If already on Test, I would recommend pulse (because of the sides, mainly cramps) but if stand alone, go straight as long as you can, 4-5 weeks if you can.
 
Dblock said:
3 weeks of anything will give you a temporary bump in water and glycogen stores. Nothing “sticks” in that short of a time span…building lasting muscle takes a long time and consistency over a very long period
Click to expand...
Also this
 
GaryMan said:
So what's wrong with the question? Mike Arnold has stated pulsing Superdrol is superior. Some have argued for it, some against it. I just wanted different opinions or experiences. I would argue your response was completely useless and offered zero value.
Click to expand...
Your probably thinking of Dr. D, it's his pulse method. And my statement has nothing to do with weather or not it works, steroids always work. have fun
 
Dblock said:
3 weeks of anything will give you a temporary bump in water and glycogen stores. Nothing “sticks” in that short of a time span…building lasting muscle takes a long time and consistency over a very long period
Click to expand...
100%
 
BBiceps said:
If already on Test, I would recommend pulse (because of the sides, mainly cramps) but if stand alone, go straight as long as you can, 4-5 weeks if you can.
Click to expand...
That's what I did. I pulsed it as a finisher. It does work, less sides, although you don't get quite the same results as running it straight.

Honestly, I think sdrol sucks as a standalone whether you run it straight or pulsed. It's fine if you need a quick fix for a photo shoot or something but no results are going to stick.
 
3 weeks of SD, with test, with GH, with the kitchen sink will not give you any lasting gains…they will be temporary. I think most as you can see agree…just my opinion though
 
BigKevKris said:
230 but thanks for asking. Ive been training with gear for 13 years. Your ridiculous comments show your lack of knowledge.
Click to expand...
You thinking that you can build any amount of muscle in 3 weeks shows your lack of knowledge, the average steroid user juice to the gills puts on about 10 lb of muscle per year. The only thing I'm challenging is your common sense.
 
Last edited:
Don't forget guys, steroids stop working after week 4. Don't run SD past 3 weeks because it stops working 😂😂😂
 
i lasted 2 days on SD back in the day .. felt so depressed ( but i was going through tough times too so all just piled on but SD def doesnt help
 
GQdaLEGEND said:
i lasted 2 days on SD back in the day .. felt so depressed ( but i was going through tough times too so all just piled on but SD def doesnt help
Click to expand...
Sorry bud, hope your feeling better now. Being depressed or having issues and then hopping on a cycle can definitely make things worse. Steroids also can effect neurosteroids. Only being 2 days on SD was likely a coincidence. But you gotta pick and choose your battles.
 
Training for 30 years…. Even 6-8 weeks runs aren’t enough….but I get it, some guys are scared to hurt themselves, or their body, liver etc. 3 weeks though, women in the gym run stuff longer than that without fear
 
Dblock said:
Training for 30 years…. Even 6-8 weeks runs aren’t enough….but I get it, some guys are scared to hurt themselves, or their body, liver etc. 3 weeks though, women in the gym run stuff longer than that without fear
Click to expand...
Chicks are the worst lol. I know a lady that's been on 10-20mg of winni and 10-20mg of var for pretty much the past year. Yes those are super low doses, but she's like 130lbs female, great shape, but only/always uses orals. Idk if she ever takes a break
 
Dblock said:
Training for 30 years…. Even 6-8 weeks runs aren’t enough….but I get it, some guys are scared to hurt themselves, or their body, liver etc. 3 weeks though, women in the gym run stuff longer than that without fear
Click to expand...
I agree. If you're not a competing bodybuilder and you just want to hop on a 6-8 week cycle to occasionally help you break those annoying plateaus to help keep you motivated, I get it. But you have to have realistic expectations of the results. You're not going to get on stage running 6-8 week cycles.
 
BigKevKris said:
is that so? I have proven my method with SD on several occasions.....but you know......we are all experts here.
Click to expand...
Naw, you might look amazing after 3 weeks of SD but you haven’t built anything temporary on that short time, you know that, even if you try to prove a point.

Btw, you’re fairly new here so don’t talk sh*t to the OG’s, it won’t get you anywhere.
 
BBiceps said:
Naw, you might look amazing after 3 weeks of SD but you haven’t built anything temporary on that short time, you know that, even if you try to prove a point.

Btw, you’re fairly new here so don’t talk sh*t to the OG’s, it won’t get you anywhere.
Click to expand...

Now's when they usually claim it's some kind of "status" thing .... When we all know that things/people are proven over time.
 
BigKevKris said:
Assinine and ignorant post. After 3 weeks the cons outweighed the pros with SD. My opinion.....Back pumps, lethargy. I didnt say a fucking thing about it stopping working. Not to mention it was a KICKSTART. You can try to make me look stupid but it reflects poorly on you.
Click to expand...
Your exact words were "gains stop around week 4"

No, they don't.

And in his opening post, at no point did he mention anything about a Kickstart or any other aspects to this cycle. So now your shuffling your words and shifting the goalposts to make yourself feel like your right 👍.

Here's his original post

Screenshot_20260114-081353.webp



This is the post you responded to☝️

So your making **** up now, even if later on he mentioned it, it wasn't ever mentioned when you made your post.

And that's fine if the cons outweighed the pros, they often do after a certain point. But it doesn't change anything that you said, because it's not what you originally said.

Your arguing that your going to build all the muscle SD has to offer in the first 3 weeks, when in reality, during the first 3 weeks your likely going to gain maybe 2-3 lbs of muscle and 15lbs of water and glycogen in the muscle, which looks awesome, but it's not muscle.

I'm done bickering here, enjoy the rest of your day princess
 
Last edited:
Smont said:
You thinking that you can build any amount of muscle in 3 weeks shows your lack of knowledge, the average steroid user juice to the gills puts on about 10 lb of muscle per year. The only thing I'm challenging is your common sense.
Click to expand...

Wow... only 10 lbs in a year???????? I know zero about gear and find this very surprising. Like if I had a gun to my head I'd have guessed 10lbs in a few months. Are you talking about experienced guys? Really just curious.
 
jfigliuolo said:
Wow... only 10 lbs in a year???????? I know zero about gear and find this very surprising. Like if I had a gun to my head I'd have guessed 10lbs in a few months. Are you talking about experienced guys? Really just curious.
Click to expand...
10 lb is a lot of muscle, Actual muscle tissue, not weight gained. Lots of people gain 20 pounds on a cycle or 50 lb in a year. But diet back down to your starting body fat percentage and that will tell you how much muscle you gained. Think about this, say you've been bodybuilding for 5 years and you gained 10 lb of muscle per year. That's 50 lb of muscle you would have gained in 5 years.

Now realistically can you think of anyone that you've seen put on 50 lb of muscle in 5 years, again I'm not talking about 50 lb of body weight. I'm talking about 50 lb of muscle. Because if the average person put on 50 lb of muscle you would look like a bodybuilder.


Here's a good visual of 30-50 lb of mass real muscle mass looks like.
Screenshot_20260114-142229.webp

Screenshot_20260114-142549.webp
 
Smont said:
10 lb is a lot of muscle, Actual muscle tissue, not weight gained. Lots of people gain 20 pounds on a cycle or 50 lb in a year. But diet back down to your starting body fat percentage and that will tell you how much muscle you gained. Think about this, say you've been bodybuilding for 5 years and you gained 10 lb of muscle per year. That's 50 lb of muscle you would have gained in 5 years.

Now realistically can you think of anyone that you've seen put on 50 lb of muscle in 5 years, again I'm not talking about 50 lb of body weight. I'm talking about 50 lb of muscle. Because if the average person put on 50 lb of muscle you would look like a bodybuilder.


Here's a good visual of 30-50 lb of mass real muscle mass looks like. View attachment 257885
View attachment 257886
Click to expand...

^^^ Yep. ^^^
 
Smont said:
10 lb is a lot of muscle, Actual muscle tissue, not weight gained. Lots of people gain 20 pounds on a cycle or 50 lb in a year. But diet back down to your starting body fat percentage and that will tell you how much muscle you gained. Think about this, say you've been bodybuilding for 5 years and you gained 10 lb of muscle per year. That's 50 lb of muscle you would have gained in 5 years.

Now realistically can you think of anyone that you've seen put on 50 lb of muscle in 5 years, again I'm not talking about 50 lb of body weight. I'm talking about 50 lb of muscle. Because if the average person put on 50 lb of muscle you would look like a bodybuilder.


Here's a good visual of 30-50 lb of mass real muscle mass looks like. View attachment 257885
View attachment 257886
Click to expand...
^This^
This is also for the most dedicated guys, it’s not easy to keep that going year after year.

Overall weight is easy to gain but lean muscle is not, it requires a lot of effort.
 
jfigliuolo said:
Wow... only 10 lbs in a year???????? I know zero about gear and find this very surprising. Like if I had a gun to my head I'd have guessed 10lbs in a few months. Are you talking about experienced guys? Really just curious.
Click to expand...
Like Smont said, 10lbs is A LOT for an experienced bodybuilder. Smont is talking about actual muscle tissue, which is a lot different than what most people seem to think of when they talk about how much they gain from a cycle.

It's important to keep in mind that none of this stuff is linear. If it was linear and you actually did gain 20lbs of muscle from a cycle and then gained another 20.... and then another 20... and so on... within only a few years you would kill yourself. Same thing with strength. If strength was linear we would see guys picking up skyscrapers.
 
Stacks1 said:
Like Smont said, 10lbs is A LOT for an experienced bodybuilder. Smont is talking about actual muscle tissue, which is a lot different than what most people seem to think of when they talk about how much they gain from a cycle.

It's important to keep in mind that none of this stuff is linear. If it was linear and you actually did gain 20lbs of muscle from a cycle and then gained another 20.... and then another 20... and so on... within only a few years you would kill yourself. Same thing with strength. If strength was linear we would see guys picking up skyscrapers.
Click to expand...
Ya that's kinda my point, if SD or Anything really, made you gain 10-20lbs of muscle in a month, then I would be bigger then Ronnie Coleman already lol.

But I will say, if you follow bodybuilding, backtrack all the top guys to pictures of them in the beginning, there first shows or even highschool pictures and then go look at them 10 years into there career, they all are up 70-100lbs. Nick Walker and big ramy are probably the most insane gains ever.

Even if you go back and look at Arnold as a teenager, and I'm talking when he was competing at 150 to 160 lb, I don't even know if most people know he competed that small. What if you go throughout his career his first couple shows he added 15 to 20 lb each year and then about 10 lb/year after that until he maxed out around 245lbs
 
Last edited:
I think superdrol at 20-30mg's daily for the last 3-4 weeks of contest prep would be where it would really shine and worth taking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top