lokedog
New member
Hey guys my assessment is this:
It may enhance capacity to do more work, may not have any sides - fibrosis (sp?) cancer etc.., but i just dont see anything to warrant spending any money for that UNLESS it were to actually work miracles combating the negative effects of aas induced cholesterol. Even then, unless that contribution was extreme, i still can't justify its use.
Since i last visited this thread ive read a whole lot more anecdotal evidence and the consensus is pretty much the same - it just doesn't do much and there are a multitude of other compounds with well known variables that do. But if you like to experiment and spend money go for it.
It may enhance capacity to do more work, may not have any sides - fibrosis (sp?) cancer etc.., but i just dont see anything to warrant spending any money for that UNLESS it were to actually work miracles combating the negative effects of aas induced cholesterol. Even then, unless that contribution was extreme, i still can't justify its use.
Since i last visited this thread ive read a whole lot more anecdotal evidence and the consensus is pretty much the same - it just doesn't do much and there are a multitude of other compounds with well known variables that do. But if you like to experiment and spend money go for it.