I havent come across any consensus on this topic, and certainly no science to settle things.
One of the best forum articles I have read on tren, had this to say:
Im definitely going to try this method for my next blast, but will problably experiment with non-trt doses of test in the future too.
Nah, its not methylated.
Theres a couple studies on trestolone; halflife is 40mins.
And think about it: 25mg is considered a very strong IM dose of trest. Should we really think that someone applying 100mg TD is getting 4x that? Even double (50mg) is ridiculous. If TD was that good, no-one...
The tricky thing with clomid is the z-isomer (zuclomiphene). This isomer can linger in the body up to two months after the last dose of clomid (case studies report a wide range of rate-of-elimination which tends to be very individualistic), and is estrogenic.
Theres a couple of hrt clinic docs...
SARMs will only suppress your HPTA and TT further. They could even make whatever youve got going on with your HPTA (and/or lipids) worse.
I see pros and cons to all your options. The "best" choice depends largely on your priorities.
Nb: running ostar and/or LGD without a test base (inj, andro...
Most of that nomenclature (at least what is sensible) looks like natty stuff (ferulic acid is one compound). I doubt theres any real steronz in there, but onus us on you to double check OP.
You gotta wonder why a company lists natty ingredients by their nomenclature. Well, pretty obvious that...
As far as the test-e dose, 250mg once per week should get you up around 70nmol/l, or 2000ng/dl. So not a huge blast increase, but supraphysiological nonetheless.
K. You sound really determined and headstrong, and I like that in a woman.
But srs. Good luck, and hopefully any gainz you do get you hold after PCT is done.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.