My bad I wasnt imply to combine them. I was meaning individually
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
And I can't find it right now because I don't have time to but there was a study with letro where patients had test levels in the 200s that all got increased to above 1300s
Man I've been off this forum for a while and I am so glad I came back and saw you still posting. Definitely was worried you may have passed while I was gone. You're good dude and I'm glad you're recovering is going well
Am I the only one that gets nothing from anything under a 100mg of topical preg (and oral pointless at all doses for me)?? Like when I start getting to 150mg topical it is like magic!!!!
I'm not surprised by the name but rather what the fuk is in it. Either it is blatantly using false nomenclature, which is none compliant. Or it is what it says which is again none compliant.
Wait I know I've been out for a while, and I'm not the greatest chemist, but wouldn't that be 2 epiandrosterone molecules bonded by nitrogen through replacing a carbon for a nitrogen in the benzene ring? Or is this just blatant misuse of nomenclature?
First question is that really what this is...
Their pre is nowhere near the best like it used to be. There is much better on the market.
They downgrade every test booster they have.
So pretty much every release they've for a while has been a joke. Its not that the products terrible it's just that there are better options and that NEVER...
My money is on this not actually having dmha or dmaa. It will be spiked with an amphetamine analogue until it gets super popular again, then they will reformulate it and pull the analogue out and "remove" the dmha and dmaa from the label.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.