I briefly looked over the full study (4 pages).. their main gripe is that they want active's to be listed on the label.
They also claim unnaturally high levels of theophylline.. which doesn't really make sense...
That's like saying a 5g serving of creatine mono contains "unnaturally" high...
Hmm... you do rep for BPS..
JK :p
You did stack it however, I'm just looking for straight up -epi
Obviously it's shows amazing results, just interesting nevertheless...
I was speaking in part due to the comment at the end:
What undeclared active substances did they find? The propaganda is you're scaring the general public by spreading misinformation. There are 2 point of views from this abstract. You have the one that says everything found in their test...
I do not. It's more alarmist propaganda. Everything they found was as listed on the label so it comes to question if whoever made this study has some sort of an agenda.
Everything they found was declared... so...:bsflag:
They both reference the same 1mg per kg study and Biotivia is a premium brand. They also list the % extract whereas Follidrone doesn't. I'd wager they are basically the same amount in the end.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.