Interestingly enough, Sabinsa's patent on Forskolin literally expired today, so in the next year or so you might see more people come to market with high % extracts ;)
Some of the use cases for branded ingredients fall down to:
They demonstrate increased effectiveness over generic ingredients for the use case of the product
There isn't sufficient reason to believe that Pycnogenol would provide an effectiveness advantage in this product
They have IP coverage...
Agmatine is great...I take it every morning...our bulk agmatine is 16 cents/day...if you really it, buy a tub and add it to this, but no reason to increase the production cost of this product, and change the texture/mixing profile of it when we already have it in another labels pump product, and...
I don't think the court order precluded the defendants from selling the USPLabs IP/Trademarks to anybody.
And I guess those people wouldn't be under any injunction from operating business under the label?
If you're strictly wanting to add calories, I'd go with something from outside of the sports supplement world personally.
You're going to get more balanced calories for your $ from something like Huel than most bodybuilding mass gainers, and usually with better quality fats/carbs
Depends on your training intensity. I think your ceiling with X-gels is higher if you're going balls to the wall with the intensity and can deal with the DOMS.
So, if you wanted have a debate, what exactly are you claiming?
That this patent references invalid science, and that procyanidins are not endothelium relaxing compounds?
Invalid Link Removed
--
Or that Compound solutions isn't applying the extraction and isolation method described in this...
Which Tianeptine warning letters predate the two in November?
I don't see any in the FDAs published list or federal register, though I might have missed them.
There's also doesn't actually appear to be any published adverse events in CFSANs database at all for Vicaine, or any tianeptine...
I never said it wasn't effective.
There's a dozen other broad spectrum anti-virals under research.
Why would people fund his when they can fund their own?
What specific data indicates that DRACO is more promising than the other antivirals? One in vivo study and some in vitro data?
Probably because there are already numerous other pipeline broad spectrum anti-virals in development, and there's nothing to indicate that DRACO is any more worth research dollars then the projects already underway.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
I think that the one he OD'd on got a letter.
Just like it's hard to imagine that the FDA had an adverse event for a specific product, and then warned two other random companies and not the companies whose products were generating adverse events.
So they had adverse events from Tianeptine products, and then sent warning letters to manufacturers of OTHER tianeptine products instead of the ones that generated the adverse events?
No one was harmed? The FDA says otherwise. Take your beef up with them.
And rest assured, I've had plenty of beef with people putting out dangerous products.
But I can also assure you, it's nothing personal. I'll congratulate people on a good product, hassle them on underdosed crap, and...
I genuinely hope that's all true and wish you good luck with your endeavours and it's really nothing personal.
I'm just a grumpy old cynic whose seen some ****.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.