The problem is this new law is pretty ambiguous. Anything with a chemical structure "substantially similar" to testosterone or any of the explicitly banned substances, but not listed by name, is still potentially subject to the ban.
The law does keep plant-derived substances legal, so stuff...
I happen to agree whole-heartedly. That post you quoted was in response to someone saying that they should impose a legal age for prohormones, which I was trying to point out would never happen. But that's an issue that extends far beyond this one bill. And unfortunately it's a product of the...
Wow. That's crazy. I'm still pretty young so I have never really looked that deeply into TRT, had no idea how irresponsible doctors are about it.
So essentially what you guys are saying is that the pharma companies are not down for people self-medicating with prohormones. Interesting thought...
Wow really? Did not know that.
Why would the pharma companies care so much about prohormones?
Can you link me to the gym membership tax? All I see on Google is about a tax effective in DC only.
I see your point. Maybe you're right.
Only thing I can really say in response is that theres a "sketch factor" and possibility of legal ramifications that will probably turn away a significant amount of would-be abusers.
Oh, and the misguided idea that OTC prohormones are safe because they...
I know...sorry sorry sorry!
Believe me, I'm pissed too. If I had it my way, all drugs would be not only legal, but tested for purity by the gov't so people know exactly what they are putting in their bodies and it would be up to them to research how to do it safely. But people are too dumb for...
Problem with creating a minimum age is that then you essentially have the government saying it's okay to use roids after you turn 21. Prohormones are still dangerous to anyone over 21 if they don't know what they are doing. Sadly, people who actually do their research and ask questions online...
This may be an unpopular opinion on here, but please bear with me:
I just want to point out that it's the dumb 16 year old kids who buy PHs off the shelves either online or in stores, who have caused all the problems related to PH/steroid abuse.
Does it suck that responsible, educated users...
I wonder if Arimistane and other non-herbal AI's will be banned. The letter of the law is sort of unclear.
Looks like plant-derived androgens like Natadrol won't be effected though. That might be the best bet for current PH users.
If you read the language of the bill, even compounds that aren't expressly written out and named on the list are still subject to the new regulations.
Bye bye every PH ever.
Ah, thanks for the info. I did some quick research and found out that L-dopa (levodopa) is on the prop 65 list. Supposedly it causes developmental issues. So don't give it to kids, which should be obvious. Luckily for me, I am aged like a fine wine.
Anyone who is interested, here is the prop...
Just curious -- what did you end up going with?
It is not. It's a natural anabolic (non-hormonal) which also has test boosting effects. It's going to be part of my next stack. I'm really excited to try it because of all the positive reviews it's been getting on here.
Relevant RE: Alpha-GPC: Invalid Link Removed
Provided a 14% increase in bench press force compared to placebo, 45 mins post-dosage. I'd say that's pretty solid for an acute strength increase.
It's my single favorite hormone support product. Maybe even my favorite non-basic supplement in general. Worth it alone for the mood it puts me in, let alone the physical effects.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.