If you had a product with substantial evidence showing compliance would you even bother trying to submit an NDI? I don't think I would. It almost seems as if you are better off saving your resources for the backend fight if needed. I say this because the FDA can decline your NDI then leave you...
It could happen. But it's very rare (heavily cited):
Invalid Link Removed
The CRN is perhaps the most hypocritical organization of all time though. I do not buy supplements from any company that supports them.
It's not an article. The data is all in this paper. Are you saying they lied about the data, then published it in a peer reviewed respected journal?
A synthetic stimulant never tested in humans, 1,3-dimethylbutylamine (DMBA), is identified in multiple dietary supplements.
Drug Test Anal. 2014...
I'm not arguing whether they are or are not compliant with the dietary supplement laws of X country (there are several compliant prohormones, no designer steroids). I'm simply saying they harm significantly fewer people.
Huh so 1 of the 3 liver transplants patients weren't even using OEP Pro? Or do they not count the death who had a transplant?
The new paper from the doctors in Hawaii suggests all three were using OEP.
I'll give you the aegeline thing. I haven't seen the data suggesting it is or is not hepatotoxic. But something in those products (counterfeit or whatever) was killing livers and I don't believe it was a designer steroid.
My point on stimulant related deaths vs Prohormones still stands.
And...
Lol no there are actually very few case studies on any prohormone causing adverse issues. Stop making **** up. And 90% of published case studies from designer steroids were from methasterone (now controlled) and not one death has ever been reported (unlike multiple deaths from designer...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.