They are very much a gray area supplement, I'm guessing companies and retailers didn't want to have to fear the FDA cracking the whip on them. Which may be why if you order from RC companies the CC processor is sometimes an overseas outlet.
My point was that outside the context of "protein is protein" that hydro whey might not be conducive to muscle gain so why would companies put it in their products and why would people use it as a supplemental means of protein ingestion if this were the case?
Example 1: Invalid Link Removed
"WPH resulted in 1/3 of the muscle gain caused by WPC...but it will also result in less muscle gain and more fat gain"
Example 2: Invalid Link Removed
Hydrolyzed whey helped lose body fat but not muscle gain.
Opinions?
I'm all for user discretion but including it in the category of "dietary supplements" i.e. pre workouts is only going to draw more attention especially with the NDI guidelines.
You could but not at the doses which they have been shown to be effective, Alpha GPC has a higher actual choline content compared to Citicoline so if you primarily wanted choline then that would be the choice.
Disregard information about how your somatotype will dictate your results, if carbs are a large part of your diet then Anabeta would be your best bet out of what you mentioned.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.