If he alloted 3.5 billion for election resources and then won again, wouldnt you say that was a fair victory? I would.
If he was to win after not giving the required money, then it's just going to be ammo that people use after the election. If he did it and won, imagine the clout he would have.
Just to be very clear, because I havent been:
I absolutely support the argument that requiring verification that someone is who they say they are. I also support the idea that if the mail in system is truly this exposed to corruption then the discussion might need to be had about how to safe...