That's a false dichotomy.
The point still stands that 59 people dying and 413 being wounded/ injured at an event by a single, lawful gun owner against tens of thousands of random concert-goers is nothing to balk at. You generally see gang violence restricted to areas that contain gangs and to people involved with gangs. Not all the time, but alot of the time the violence is contained to those populations.
When it comes to mass shootings, it is typically against random members of the public. They might share a single common ground (i.e. go to the same school, or share the same faith, or enjoy the same music), but that's about all that connects them to each other.
So, statistically speaking, are you, a non-gang member, more likely to die from going about your normal life or from a gang member shooting you?
And no, i'm not saying guns are bad or should be banned. But it's the fanatic, the extremist, the broken, the lonely, and the mentally unwell that I think should be restricted from owning weapons.
