As I've followed your progress over the last year, the thing I've noticed (besides your incredible strength) is the increase of what seems to be minor joint issues. Personally, I think lower weight and higher reps is the way to go. Not saying that you can't max out every once in a while, but I think age-wise you're beating yourself up too much. The super heavy weights, the crazy work schedule and the lack of sleep are beginning to take a toll on your body. But, that's just the opinion of a guy who knows less about this stuff than anybody.
This is a great observation - and I will say that if you are doing 1 set to 15 reps vs. 1 set to 10 reps, that's fine. But if you're doing 5 sets to 15, that's like adding 2 extra sets of stress, and not necessarily getting any more muscle growth from it, and also making recovery more difficult. In combination with tank999 below, I think lighter weights and and higher reps have a place, but they can go too far also. It depends on the entire strategy, not simply just how many reps.
SFreed is right though 100% - this all comes down to a recovery thing. You are NOT indestructible and it isn't JUST about how many reps you are doing in the gym. Lack of sleep, physical job, stressful job, life stress, diet, etc. - it all adds up. And SFreed is an old (jab) guy who I KNOW has been injured, but he is also one of the guys on here who complains the least about joint problems at his age, from what I see.
There is also Beast73 who trains very differently than most - and from what I can tell he doesn't seem to have major issues. His advice would probably go against my advice above 100%.
I agree with
HIT4ME on lowering volume rather than weight... especially when your in a kcal deficit and cutting. Seems to me that if you don't move heavy weight your body will have no reason to hold on to the lean tissue and you'll lose more LBM...
Yeah, in an extreme deficit this becomes especially important - less work, more stimulus.
This. I have noticed some good changes all over my body by mixing in straight reps and lowering the weight and doing sets with 3 or 4 second negatives and incorporating pauses as well. Very helpful. For me, anyway.
THIS is the cadence I would say. You can argue the contraction, but unless you are training for powerlifting or an explosive sport, I don't buy it that a rapid contraction is necessary. The way Mentzer explained it in his book that opened my eyes was that, you have 3 levels of strength - concentric, static, and eccentric. Concentric is the weakest, static is the next weakest, eccentric is the strongest. That being said, if you are doing any concentric work at all, you should be able to stop and hold the weight at ANY point in that motion - if you can't, then you HAVE to be using momentum.
And the bad thing about momentum that we all overlook is something this guy Newton showed us - what goes up, must come down. So, we don't always conciously notice this, but if we force a weight up with even a tiny bit of momentum, it has inertia at that point. And if it has inertia going up, it is going to reach the peak, stop, and then have inertia coming down - which basically means the weight is crashing down on us and we don't realize it - but our muscles and our joints are absorbing that shock. Again, we may not notice, but repeatedly doing this is going to be bad.
I always think of something I read about running - that when we run we can come down with 3,000 pounds of force on a knee. This puts in perspective how phenomenal our body can be to withstand this - but once you realize that force, think about what happens if you throw up 300 pounds and then it comes crashing down on your shoulders/elbows. No way that won't create issues over time.
Personally, when I'm being "good" I shoot for a 4/2/4 cadence. If I was training for football, this would be bad - as I wouldn't be training for explosive power. But I will never play for the Patriots no matter how much weight I throw around. So I don't need to be explosive. I need to be able to move sh1t.
Lower weights doesn't have to mean higher reps - instead you can do slower reps. There's a bunch of people here of all ages making fantastic gainz with lighter weights fir moderate and slower reps. Just saying.
And THIS is exactly what I was getting at - heavy weight isn't EVERYTHING. Think intensity, not weight.
Slower reps, shorter rests between sets, PRE-EXHAUSTION are all techniques that can be applied. We also tend to think of exercises from a single muscle group perspective, but that isn't always the best way to see all possibilities. For instance, dips are great for chest AND tri's, under handed pull ups or pull downs hit the lats and the bi's, etc.
So, for instance, my current leg/chest/tri's day is:
Leg Extensions supersetted with squats - I do a drop set with a slow cadence to failure 3X on the leg extensions and then without a break get under a squat bar and go to failure. 1 set.
Then I do Leg Presses. 1 set.
Then I do flat dumbbell flyes supersetted with incline barbell bench presses. I go to failure on both. 1 set.
Then I do Rope Press downs. 1 set.
Then I do dips. 1 set. This hits both tri's and chest and is a great finisher.
That's just 5 sets for 3 bodyparts - 7 if you break out the two supersets. I am not making the progress you've made, and there are always tweaks to be made (for instance, my tri's especially suck I may need to do more) - but even with a slow cadence I can do all that in around 4 minutes with LONG breaks and setup time (home gym, I have to set up for every exercise).
Also, your not wrong about the heavy weights being the problem to some degree. We all want to push more and will start to sacrifice cadence, form, etc. for this. Sometimes it slowly erodes as we add weight over months, and then suddenly we realize we've really let our form go or we aren't really lifting the weight anymore. But as Lee Haney said, "Stimulate, don't annihilate".
I did a 5 X 5 and that's when I REALLY figured out what Haney meant. You can start off with a 5 X 5 and work with a weight for 5 sets of 5 and NEVER hit failure. The next week, you can add 5 pounds and NEVER hit failure. And you can repeat this process for a while, even though you are using weights that are heavier than you thought you could lift. The reason is that you are stimulating growth without placing a huge tax on your system. You just go through the movements and your body responds and then you do more. I think this (what I call the idea of training, not destroying) and basic progression are the two ideas that everyone thinks they get, but they often don't.