Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

Gutterpump said:
Don't change the topic, go put your daughter in a short dress and lay her down on your bed and make her kiss you for a photo. It's presidential bro
Click to expand...

Maybe it was after a formal party and she is dressed to look like a good teenager, 13 year olds like to look good too ya know. I dont really see how he "made" her kiss him. I mean its just his daughter and he kissed his father. People can turn nothing into something.
 
ax1 said:
Maybe it was after a formal party and she is dressed to look like a good teenager, 13 year olds like to look good too ya know. I dont really see how he "made" her kiss him. I mean its just his daughter and he kissed his father. People can turn nothing into something.
Click to expand...

Why's she laying on her bed kissing him while he's posing on the phone pulling blue steel into the camera? I never said he's forcing anyone in that pic. Just said it's creepy AF
 
Gutterpump said:
Why's she laying on her bed kissing him while he's posing on the phone pulling blue steel into the camera? I never said he's forcing anyone in that pic. Just said it's creepy AF
Click to expand...

You said "make her," anyways not a big deal.

There is nothing unusual about a father and daughter having a close relationship and being on a bed being cozy together. Its just a father and daughter thats just how I read it.
 
Gutterpump said:
Like me. I'll be voting for her
Click to expand...
I don't want Trump to be President, but I can't vote for Hillary. Trump is a scumbag, but Hillary has already shown blatant disregard for the law while in office, and gotten away with it. I wish the Libertarian party had a better candidate than Johnson (Ron Paul would be great, and even Rand would be good), but he'd still be better than Trump or Clinton.

I forgot if you ever mentioned it, what is your opinion on Hillary? Do you like her, think she's OK, or think she's terrible but better than Trump?

I think that anyone who actually supports Trump or Clinton (as in thinks they'd be great presidents) is a bit confused, but I can see the arguments in both sides for voting for one to keep the other out of office, but that's not really the same as adamantly supporting them.
 
I find it so funny that conservatives like youngandfree accuse liberals of spreading lies. He must live in the same alternate universe as Drumpf.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
I don't want Trump to be President, but I can't vote for Hillary. Trump is a scumbag, but Hillary has already shown blatant disregard for the law while in office, and gotten away with it. I wish the Libertarian party had a better candidate than Johnson (Ron Paul would be great, and even Rand would be good), but he'd still be better than Trump or Clinton.

I forgot if you ever mentioned it, what is your opinion on Hillary? Do you like her, think she's OK, or think she's terrible but better than Trump?

I think that anyone who actually supports Trump or Clinton (as in thinks they'd be great presidents) is a bit confused, but I can see the arguments in both sides for voting for one to keep the other out of office, but that's not really the same as adamantly supporting them.
Click to expand...

Good post dude I don't necessarily like her but she's far more presidential and prepared for office. I think she'll be ok to fill in for 4 years till some major party cleanup can happen. Hopefully on both sides. But as far as I see it, the GOP has imploded. It will be interesting to see what the Libertarians do after this year too.
 
Gutterpump said:
No, actually at this point I would vote for her. Trump is definitely the worst option.
Click to expand...

But she already is a well established corrupt war mongering genocidalist terrorist. She has murdered hundreds of thousands of children with her policies. Totally get the not vote for Dump thing (I get both sides,) but would you really sell yourself out to what you think (I do think its scientifically vice versa at this point) is the lesser of the 2 evils? Is it worth it? Personally Id rather sink with the ship and die. I already feel nasty for life voting for Barry that first term.
 
Going back to the 13 yer old daughter issue....I have a 13 year old daughter, and no, I wouldn't pose for that picture and neither would my daughter. However, Trump is a complete narcissist, so that picture in his mind is probably totally ok as long as he is promoting himself.

I will also say this, neither is qualified for the job of President. No one won that debate Sunday, but this country lost
 
I just found this, but I honestly don't know if it is correct or not. Don't have much time to dig around today. I also read that it might be December before pre-trial conferences take place. I think they mentioned December 16.

Invalid Link Removed

It seems that Epstein is pretty connected to Trump as well.
 
AE14 said:
Going back to the 13 yer old daughter issue....I have a 13 year old daughter, and no, I wouldn't pose for that picture and neither would my daughter. However, Trump is a complete narcissist, so that picture in his mind is probably totally ok as long as he is promoting himself.

I will also say this, neither is qualified for the job of President. No one won that debate Sunday, but this country lost
Click to expand...

I was able to hear it finally, it wasnt a debate. You cant call it a debate. It was a WWE event, thats about it. I do have the winner of that, but this is getting less intellectually stimulating by every election. Sometimes I wish I was born 50 years earlier.
 
AE14 said:
Going back to the 13 yer old daughter issue....I have a 13 year old daughter, and no, I wouldn't pose for that picture and neither would my daughter. However, Trump is a complete narcissist, so that picture in his mind is probably totally ok as long as he is promoting himself.

I will also say this, neither is qualified for the job of President. No one won that debate Sunday, but this country lost
Click to expand...

Agreed on all points.
 
Gutterpump said:
Lol!! Canada is great! Have you ever been to Toronto? It's what all large international multi-cultural cities should model themselves after.
Click to expand...
Toronto is a pretty nice city. I stayed in a hostel (which was actually very nice and a great price, with free computers to use and a modern kitchen) right next to Kensington Market for a week this past summer. I felt completely safe walking to and back from a Blue Jays game at night, and most people there are pretty friendly. There's lots of great food too. There is a decent homeless population from what I've seen, but they don't actually bother anyone.
 
Gutterpump said:
The real wiki leaks smoking gun points to Trump, not Hillary. Just came across this:

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

That article and the Newsweek article is an exercise in chasing it's own tail. The author of the Newsweek article, that was posted in the email, quoted Sidney Blumenthal as saying the following...
"Clinton was in charge of the State Department, and it failed to protect U.S. personnel at an American consulate in Libya. If the GOP wants to raise that as a talking point against her, it is legitimate," said Blumenthal, putting to rest the Democratic Party talking point that the investigation into Clinton's management of the State Department at the time of the attack was nothing more than a partisan witch hunt."

The author didn't say it, he reported what Sneaky Sid had said. Who gives a **** what a Russian news rag says about what's in the email. For this guy to claim Trump is working with Russia to alter the emails is a joke.

Invalid Link Removed

Here's the Newsweek article
 
Trump seems to be going even further off the deep end. Right wingers think Obama is overreaching for power, but what about Trump. Is he the second coming of Nixon?

Look at what LePage said about him:Invalid Link Removed
 
youngandfree said:
That article and the Newsweek article is an exercise in chasing it's own tail. The author of the Newsweek article, that was posted in the email, quoted Sidney Blumenthal as saying the following...
"Clinton was in charge of the State Department, and it failed to protect U.S. personnel at an American consulate in Libya. If the GOP wants to raise that as a talking point against her, it is legitimate," said Blumenthal, putting to rest the Democratic Party talking point that the investigation into Clinton's management of the State Department at the time of the attack was nothing more than a partisan witch hunt."

The author didn't say it, he reported what Sneaky Sid had said. Who gives a **** what a Russian news rag says about what's in the email. For this guy to claim Trump is working with Russia to alter the emails is a joke.

Invalid Link Removed

Here's the Newsweek article
Click to expand...

No, Trump is the joke ;)
 
But while attempting to verify the email’s authenticity, Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald discovered that the email attributed to Blumenthal did not come from Blumenthal at all––because the email was something Eichenwald himself had written.

Eichenwald wrote the article, that was published in the email. But Eicheald quoted Blumenthal in his article. Bunch of dumbass won't even read through what they are writing about or read their own source.
 
Invalid Link Removed

I don't know why I'm even trying to post facts in here, you're so blinded by the Tangerine Dream that you can't even think logically. It's all conspiracies and crazy talk. It's obvious you haven't even read the article they were referencing. He didn't quote Sidney Blumenthal in the article. The Russians (Sputnik) cherry-picked that quote from the article.

Here's the ACTUAL article: Invalid Link Removed

And here's the complete paragraph that they picked two sentences out of and attributed to Sidney Blumenthal (stolen quote in bold and italics):

"One important point has been universally acknowledged by the nine previous reports about Benghazi: The attack was almost certainly preventable. Clinton was in charge of the State Department, and it failed to protect U.S. personnel at an American consulate in Libya. If the GOP wants to raise that as a talking point against her, it is legitimate.

The earlier reports—two from the Senate, one from an independent board and six from the Republican-controlled House—were released before the 2014 election; after that, the House voted to form a special Benghazi committee, with the expectation that it would drag out its work until shortly before the 2016 election—four years after the armed assault took place. Despite all the work that has already been done investigating the attacks, the Benghazi committee has demonstrated that its members either have not read the reports or do not care about the conclusions they reached. Its members ask questions of witnesses that have already been answered—again and again. In fact, some of the questions that Republicans say have yet to be addressed have answers that are so well known they already appear on the Wikipedia page about the Benghazi attacks, sourced to the previous government reports."

Nowhere in that paragraph is a quote from Blumenthal.

It appears to me that Julian Assange might be beholden to Trump for something. At least they have sexual assault allegations in common ;)
 
Invalid Link Removed. Podesta says Hildabeast has begun to hate everyday Americans, so they need her to say she's running as a champion of everyday Americans, otherwise they won't believe it.

Its funny reading what she and her inner circle are truly talking about. And she's more presidential. Good luck with that.

Look for the multiple speeches she gave supporting fracking and saying she has promotes it in other parts of the world. I guess that's one of her private and public differences she talkyd about.
 
youngandfree said:
But while attempting to verify the email’s authenticity, Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald discovered that the email attributed to Blumenthal did not come from Blumenthal at all––because the email was something Eichenwald himself had written.

Eichenwald wrote the article, that was published in the email. But Eicheald quoted Blumenthal in his article. Bunch of dumbass won't even read through what they are writing about or read their own source.
Click to expand...

No, he didn't. Perhaps a learn to read course is in order, or maybe a course in reading comprehension. Quit getting ALL of your news from Breitbart.

It seems that you might be the dumbass for believing anything that comes out of Cheeto Jesus' mouth.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed. Podesta says Hildabeast has begun to hate everyday Americans, so they need her to say she's running as a champion of everyday Americans, otherwise they won't believe it.

Its funny reading what she and her inner circle are truly talking about. And she's more presidential. Good luck with that.

Look for the multiple speeches she gave supporting fracking and saying she has promotes it in other parts of the world. I guess that's one of her private and public differences she talkyd about.
Click to expand...

Oh my God. You aren't very good at deriving meaning from context are you? He is saying that she hates using the term "everyday Americans" in speeches. LMAO, Wow.

On the other hand, you could probably win gold if mental gymnastics was an Olympic sport.....
 
Weeks after Elon Musk with his Spac-X announces his plan to live on Mars, Obama announces his vision to live on Mars in his "Obama's write to CNN" article. ROFL! You should see the cover-story photo below of Obama looking up at the stars, really I thought I saw some bad propaghanda back in soviet russia, this country is really heading south! And some people think CiaNN debates arent rigged!!!

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
Interesting.

Invalid Link Removed
 
...that's weird. Hold on let me try and see if i can find the article again and get the link to work.

Edit: I dunno man. I read the article on my news widget right before sharing the link. Ive found it via google search, but when I click it i get the same 404 error. Hillary mustve gotten to it
 
jswain34 said:
...that's weird. Hold on let me try and see if i can find the article again and get the link to work.

Edit: I dunno man. I read the article on my news widget right before sharing the link. Ive found it via google search, but when I click it i get the same 404 error. Hillary mustve gotten to it
Click to expand...

What was it about?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top