+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2567
Results 121 to 122 of 122

how much dextrose pwo

  1.  01-09-2005  12:20 AM
    Registered User ahsans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    32
    Posts
    6
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    126

    Given that the glycemic index value of slow cooking oatmeal is 70, would it be just as effective to use a similar GI value powder, such as lactose (65)? And would it be even more effective than oats, given the value of lower GI nutrients post-workout, to use a very low GI value powder, such as fructose (32)?



  2.  07-21-2009  11:31 AM
    Registered User IanfKirby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Stats
    5'6"  150 lbs.
    Posts
    1
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    48

    I am just talking out of my arse here as an avid lurker/reader, but from what I've gathered from the experts sources around the boards (Alan, Bobo, Layne etc) they would probably tell you even though the GI of said powder is low, there is probably little or no micronutrient value when compared to oats. Even though I assume it a milk derivative, because lactose is actually the sugar present in milk, I would assume it would not retain milk's other numerous beneficial properties.

    As for the fructose, despite its low GI, I believe fructose tends to replenish liver glycogen not muscle stores. This would essentially cause a pretty quick spill-over in the BB'er, though I think it would have more useful application perhaps in endurance athletes?

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2567

Similar Forum Threads

  1. dextrose use
    By bi0hazurd in forum Supplements
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 11:07 PM
  2. Dextrose or No Dextrose while on a cut?
    By AnthonyIOSOS in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-07-2010, 11:17 AM
  3. Dextrose
    By FAMOUSX1 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 04:09 AM
  4. best dextrose
    By madmuscle in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-01-2003, 10:51 PM