Bodybuilding ForumYour AmSpace Profile
AnabolicMinds.com Forum > Anabolic Discussion > Transdermals  
Join Anabolicminds.com!! Register Today!
Old 09-06-2006, 01:29 PM   #1
Registered User
 
speedmerchant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Leave Comment
Reputation: 10 speedmerchant is on a distinguished road
Points: 141, Level: 2Points: 141, Level: 2Points: 141, Level: 2
Level up: 3%, 9 Points neededLevel up: 3%, 9 Points neededLevel up: 3%, 9 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
Transdermal question

Can anyone here share some objective feedback on commercial transdermal carriers and which has the better absorbtion rate. I'm new to transdermals, I am not a chemist, and have only heard of 2 products- Finaderm and Penetrate. Judging from what I've read, Penetrate dries out too quickly and leaves a residue. Finaderm seems to have drawn out a lot of skeptics with it's claimed 80% absorbtion rate. Can anyone make a recommendation on which trans carrier is more effective?
 
speedmerchant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 02:38 PM   #2
Board Supporter
 
Grassroots082's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Stats: 5'9" 192 lbs
Posts: 970
Leave Comment
Reputation: 2938 Grassroots082 has a reputation beyond reputeGrassroots082 has a reputation beyond reputeGrassroots082 has a reputation beyond reputeGrassroots082 has a reputation beyond reputeGrassroots082 has a reputation beyond reputeGrassroots082 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 6,634, Level: 34Points: 6,634, Level: 34Points: 6,634, Level: 34
Level up: 35%, 66 Points neededLevel up: 35%, 66 Points neededLevel up: 35%, 66 Points needed
Activity: 5%Activity: 5%Activity: 5%

View Profile
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedmerchant
Can anyone here share some objective feedback on commercial transdermal carriers and which has the better absorbtion rate. I'm new to transdermals, I am not a chemist, and have only heard of 2 products- Finaderm and Penetrate. Judging from what I've read, Penetrate dries out too quickly and leaves a residue. Finaderm seems to have drawn out a lot of skeptics with it's claimed 80% absorbtion rate. Can anyone make a recommendation on which trans carrier is more effective?
Thats basically what every thread in this section discusses. My favorite is phlojel.
 



A recovering ectomorph
Grassroots082 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 08:01 PM   #3
Gold Member
 
jonny21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 2,218
Leave Comment
Reputation: 784 jonny21 is a splendid one to beholdjonny21 is a splendid one to behold
Points: 3,189, Level: 23Points: 3,189, Level: 23Points: 3,189, Level: 23
Level up: 24%, 111 Points neededLevel up: 24%, 111 Points neededLevel up: 24%, 111 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
I would always go the conservative rout and guesstimate absorption at ~30-40% with phlojel and added PE's.
 



Quote:
I was reading up on big cats steroid profiles today and I saw nolvadex on the list. Now ive been taking that for a while after cycles and never realized it was a steroid, granted i didnt do research but want i want to know if anyone could enlighten me is WHY nolvadex is a steroid? as far as im concerned it hasnt produced any gains
jonny21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 03:25 AM   #4
Gold Member
 
fatsuperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 368
Leave Comment
Reputation: 51 fatsuperman will become famous soon enough
Points: 830, Level: 11Points: 830, Level: 11Points: 830, Level: 11
Level up: 12%, 120 Points neededLevel up: 12%, 120 Points neededLevel up: 12%, 120 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
I recommend phlo-jel. IMO it appears to be the best practical carrier.

From purely personal experience I would guess it has an absorbtion of around 25% to 33% (which is much better than the other options floating around)

I think DMSO will deliver a pretty good rate but it is impractical to use because of skin irritation

Pretreating an area with DMSO then applying Phlojel appears to increase absorbtion, but can only be done so often because of skin irritation once again

Fina derm's claim of 80% is laughable, if anyone had a carrier that could deliever 80% transdermal absorbtion for hormones, the pharmaceutical companies would be beating down their door.
 
fatsuperman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright
2002 - 2008 Anabolicminds.com