Is it average to squat 2x bodyweight? - AnabolicMinds.com

Is it average to squat 2x bodyweight?

  1. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    Is it average to squat 2x bodyweight?


    ok so my memory is foggy but im sure in Middle school my teacher said its average to bench ur body weight and squat 2 x ur body weight? or it might have been leg press.. Anyways i find this to be a myth

    Freshman thru senior year of HS i didnt squat at all wat so ever. maybe once every 2 months in the smith machine.

    Freshman year of college Squatted off and on no real routine.

    I started in june to hit legs hard started doing the squat machine which works mostly quads and Leg Pressed and did extentions and no hamstring curls because they were too imbalanced from deadlifting.

    Well from squatting in August-September now going into October. Im hitting 320 x 3 2 very good reps getting parallel. Ive had a couple ppl watch it and they say competition wise it would be good. Not that i want to compete soon but i want to use strict form for squats...

    Now i weigh 170-175 and i Squat 340 x 1 which is a ****ty rep it was 3 weeks ago. I got 320 x 3 today.. However im feeling a Legit max of 340 coming really soon? what do u guys think? is that impressive or just average lol

  2. The BPS Rep
    Resolve's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  280 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,062
    Rep Power
    350690

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    I'd say a legit 340 squat to parallel or below at a bw of 170 is pretty darn good.

    Squatting 2xBW is not avg, it's strong.
    Bulk Performance Solutions
    --No Proprietary Blends, All Performance--

    ***NOW @ NP***
  3. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    alright good to hear! im getting comfortable getting 3 plates for 1-3 reps. im LOVING wendler 5-3-1 for squats. and even after that i do a 20 rep failure one. sometimes.
    •   
       

  4. Elite Member
    Kristofer68SS's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    42
    Posts
    5,600
    Rep Power
    13731

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Resolve View Post
    I'd say a legit 340 squat to parallel or below at a bw of 170 is pretty darn good.

    Squatting 2xBW is not avg, it's strong.

    maybe 1/4 or 1/3 squat...........

    in order of least to most diffulty:
    2XBW parallel, atg or stopping down in the hole is VERY strong.

    225 stopping in the hole is hard ****........i know i did a bunch of those tonight.......
  5. Advanced Member
    fritzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    879
    Rep Power
    550

    Reputation

    yep 2x is strong

    think of all the guys who bench more than they squat

    also, a 320lb guy would then have to be doing 640 to be strong?

    340 at 170 is fantastic and dont let anyone tell you different
    just make sure they are at least inch or two below parallel so they are legit

    i like atg but some cant or dont like them at all and fair enough
  6. The BPS Rep
    Resolve's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  280 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,062
    Rep Power
    350690

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristofer68SS View Post
    maybe 1/4 or 1/3 squat...........

    in order of least to most diffulty:
    2XBW parallel, atg or stopping down in the hole is VERY strong.

    225 stopping in the hole is hard ****........i know i did a bunch of those tonight.......
    Haha, yeah, I stand corrected, it is VERY strong.

    Squatting from a dead stop is brutal!
    Bulk Performance Solutions
    --No Proprietary Blends, All Performance--

    ***NOW @ NP***
  7. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    damn thanks guys i feel good now. Not to be ****y but i when i was repping 285 x 3 i stopped on the hole looked to side at the mirrors and i was perfectly parallel. This week my 3 x 3 the last set 1 out of the 3 on 320 was sloppy. but it seems like every week i go up 5 pounds. like i can bet next couple weeks my 320 x 3 will be perfect form.
  8. Senior Member
    waynaferd's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  250 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    8401

    Reputation

    Ah you young punks!!

    I can get about 385 x 6 fairly well.....far from the 500-ish I guess I should be at!
    True story:

    I give a f**K!!
  9. Elite Member
    Kristofer68SS's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    42
    Posts
    5,600
    Rep Power
    13731

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by brownstown89 View Post
    damn thanks guys i feel good now. Not to be ****y but i when i was repping 285 x 3 i stopped on the hole looked to side at the mirrors and i was perfectly parallel. This week my 3 x 3 the last set 1 out of the 3 on 320 was sloppy. but it seems like every week i go up 5 pounds. like i can bet next couple weeks my 320 x 3 will be perfect form.
    great job

    but parallel is not in the hole........

    the hole is as low as your body will go(its actually ATG then stopping), then drive out.........

    its a bitch.
  10. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    damn so in the hole is like a box squat pretty much?
  11. Elite Member
    Kristofer68SS's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    42
    Posts
    5,600
    Rep Power
    13731

    Reputation

    In the hole- as low as your body will let you go. Below is a pretty good idea of how low. No board though.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
  12. Senior Member
    waynaferd's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  250 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    8401

    Reputation

    Hey, that looks like me!!! ^^^^^

    LOL
    True story:

    I give a f**K!!
  13. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristofer68SS View Post
    In the hole- as low as your body will let you go. Below is a pretty good idea of how low. No board though.
    looks like a great way toblow ur acl out too
  14. The BPS Rep
    Resolve's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  280 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,062
    Rep Power
    350690

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by brownstown89 View Post
    looks like a great way toblow ur acl out too
    Nah, it's actually easier on the knees to complete their natural range of motion.

    google "Squats bad for the knees?" and read up. Doing partials and/or smith squats are harder on the knees than full squats.
    Bulk Performance Solutions
    --No Proprietary Blends, All Performance--

    ***NOW @ NP***
  15. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    ok so he look at that picture and his thighs are parallel with the ground right? thats how mine are when i squat. Maybe i have a slightly different form? im honeslty not sure but i know my thighs are parrallel with the ground.

    But going ATG ive seen an nfl running back and a couple DBs blow out knees doing that im good lol..
  16. The BPS Rep
    Resolve's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  280 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,062
    Rep Power
    350690

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Arnie's femurs, running through the center of his thighs, are not parallel to the floor. His butt is lower than his knees, making his femurs below parallel to the floor.

    If your form is correct, you won't hurt yourself going past parallel. Frankly, many football players have terrible form in the weightroom - my experience there is that the amount of weight they move is much more important than the safety with which that load is moved. I.e. screw form and just move something heavier than the other team at any cost. That results in torn knees, blown backs and numerous other injuries.
    Bulk Performance Solutions
    --No Proprietary Blends, All Performance--

    ***NOW @ NP***
  17. Elite Member
    Kristofer68SS's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    42
    Posts
    5,600
    Rep Power
    13731

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Resolve View Post
    Arnie's femurs, running through the center of his thighs, are not parallel to the floor. His butt is lower than his knees, making his femurs below parallel to the floor.

    If your form is correct, you won't hurt yourself going past parallel. Frankly, many football players have terrible form in the weightroom - my experience there is that the amount of weight they move is much more important than the safety with which that load is moved. I.e. screw form and just move something heavier than the other team at any cost. That results in torn knees, blown backs and numerous other injuries.
    Exactly......Arnold is below parallel and heading towards ATG.

    On both parts......

    I have been doing ATG for 4+ years, my knees were bad BEFORE I started lifting again...........In my earlier years I did no legs......... So I have earned every little bit of leg I have'nt in the last 5 years. lol

    My knees are finally good now(knocks on wood) so i will continue with what im doing.
  18. New Member
    phL8Tme's Avatar
    Stats
    5'6"  171 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    236
    Rep Power
    182

    Reputation

    Hmmm. Can I throw something in the mix? I'm about 170 and do 10 reps @ 400lbs. But thats on a machine (...there is some controversy about this being cheating). Due to bad knees, I'm 41 in 12 days, I can only use the machine at LTF for squats.

    The peice of junk is maxed at 400, what would be my max?
  19. The BPS Rep
    Resolve's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  280 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,062
    Rep Power
    350690

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Depends entirely on the machine man - different kinds and brands provide a wide variety of stimuli. But 10x400 on a machine wouldn't translate to anything remotely close to that much on free bar.

    If you can't barbell squat due to injury I totally understand - I coudn't squat for 3months this summer because of an injury. Just know that there is a dramatic difference in the amount of weight one can handle on a machine in comparison with free weigt.
    Bulk Performance Solutions
    --No Proprietary Blends, All Performance--

    ***NOW @ NP***
  20. New Member
    UGHQTempus's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  285 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    244

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by phL8Tme View Post
    Hmmm. Can I throw something in the mix? I'm about 170 and do 10 reps @ 400lbs. But thats on a machine (...there is some controversy about this being cheating). Due to bad knees, I'm 41 in 12 days, I can only use the machine at LTF for squats.

    The peice of junk is maxed at 400, what would be my max?
    I you can squat a bare bar to the ground then you CAN squat. I don't know how bad your knees are but I'm guessing what you are really saying is that your knee problems prevent you from squating as heavy as you want/think you can.

    Ignore that voice. I've had knee problems going back well over a decade. I relearn squating with only ATG. Started with the bar for a few weeks before moving up to 95. Now I can take 365 to the hole and my lower back is the only weak point (not enough good mornings in my life) and my knees love it. No pain. No stress on the joint at all.
  21. Senior Member
    urbanski's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,195
    Rep Power
    1507

    Reputation

    i'm happy with my 1RM of 300 @171lbs. below parallel.
    i consider that strong and certainly out of the "beginner" category.
  22. Senior Member
    brownstown89's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  170 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,029
    Rep Power
    1091

    Reputation

    my ass is usually lil lower then my knees it was that way for 3 clean reps on 285 however i couldnt turn and look in the mirror while doing 320 haha im sure u guys understand.... but yea im happy with parallel i can get below parallel with 1 on 320! i just need to learn how to max out on squats.

    and whoever said u use the machine i could squat 300 for tons of reps on smith machine b4 i ever worked legs out haha.. and i could squat like 500 on some squat machine at the gym imo even light squats work ur legs better than any machine. I only used the machine cuz it focused on quaads and elimanted my imbalance
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Split Squat and Single Leg Squat
    By athletor in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 11:30 AM
  2. Free Squat Vs Smith Squat
    By goleafsgo1216 in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-30-2009, 09:49 PM
  3. how much less will a front squat be than a back squat be on average?
    By underdog13 in forum Powerlifting/Strongman
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-11-2009, 07:11 PM
  4. HP M1T + bodyweight
    By rngkng in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2004, 02:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in