+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 16 FirstFirst ... 234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 312

The #1 Cortisol Blocker

  1.  06-11-2008  09:00 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by Primordial Perf View Post
    I hope you're enjoying your delusional self-proclaimed victorys.

    -Pp
    LMAO, you're the only delusional one here.



  2.  06-11-2008  09:08 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by Primordial Perf View Post
    You’re just reposting the same unrelated research you posted before, which I’ve already replied to.

    I’m giving you a polite invite to exit the thread. I suggest you take it, before you get chewed up any further. I doubt this thread is hurting your sells as much as you think it is. Relax and stop embarrassing yourself. (and your company)

    Replace the 7OH and 5AT with PS and you will have a solid product. Nothing wrong with a reformulation.

    -Pp
    Im not in here because I think PS powder is hurting my sales, it isnt. Im here because you are lying, just like you were at mind and muscle when you posted this same crap. Ive considered PS in the past and may consider it in the future but that has nothing to do with what we are talking about. Ive never said PS wasnt good, Ive actually posted the opposite. However your comments about the nonanabolic- nonandrogenic metabolites of DHEA being suppressive is false and the above studies show that whether you want to believe it or not.

  3.  06-11-2008  09:22 PM
    Board Sponsor Primordial Perf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,832
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1849

    Originally Posted by Designer Supps View Post
    Im not in here because I think PS powder is hurting my sales, it isnt. Im here because you are lying, just like you were at mind and muscle when you posted this same crap. As I said I think PS is a good compound but at the moment there would be no reason for me to use it instead of something that is better. The only person getting embarrassed here is you.
    Yep, the same “crap” was posted on M&M and we came to the same conclusion – DHEA’s metabolites lower testosterone production.

    Here it is for anyone who wants to see -
    http://www.mindandmuscle.net/forum/i...howtopic=33280

    -Pp
    www.primordialperformance.com
    Please no PM's. I don't check them often. If you want a fast response please email me, or get in touch with one of the PP reps. I don't get on the forums often, so if I don't respond to your post, please don't be offended. -eric

  4.  06-11-2008  10:02 PM
    Registered User Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    USA
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,016
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    697

    Care to prove that they are anti-androgenic?

  5.  06-11-2008  10:21 PM
    Board Sponsor Primordial Perf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,832
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1849

    Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    Care to prove that they are anti-androgenic?
    They may not be direct anti-androgens, but they can have anti-androgenic effects. Here is one study that shows 7-oxo DHEA raising epitestosterone. (there are more studies on this)

    Delayed effects of short-term transdermal application of 7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone on its metabolites, some hormonal steroids and relevant proteohormones in healthy male volunteers.
    J Sulcova, R Hampl, M Hill, L Starka, and A Novacek
    Clin Chem Lab Med, January 1, 2005; 43(2): 221-7.


    Epitestosterone is generally considered an "anti-androgen" because it doesn’t poses significant androgenic/anabolic activity.

    -Pp
    www.primordialperformance.com
    Please no PM's. I don't check them often. If you want a fast response please email me, or get in touch with one of the PP reps. I don't get on the forums often, so if I don't respond to your post, please don't be offended. -eric

  6.  06-11-2008  10:49 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by Primordial Perf View Post
    Yep, the same “crap” was posted on M&M and we came to the same conclusion – DHEA’s metabolites lower testosterone production.

    Here it is for anyone who wants to see -
    http://www.mindandmuscle.net/forum/i...howtopic=33280

    -Pp
    Actually you were the only one who came to that conclusion.

    And there is another study that was mentioned in an article by David Tolson saying that there was no change in testosterone or estradiol levels and only T3 was increased (J Ex Physiology online. 1999 2(4). Double-Blind Study Evaluating the Effects of Exercise Plus 3-Acetyl-7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone on Body Composition and Endocrine System in Overweight Adults. Colker CM, Torina GC, Swain MA, Kalman DS.)

  7.  06-11-2008  10:54 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by Primordial Perf View Post
    They may not be direct anti-androgens, but they can have anti-androgenic effects. Here is one study that shows 7-oxo DHEA raising epitestosterone. (there are more studies on this)

    Delayed effects of short-term transdermal application of 7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone on its metabolites, some hormonal steroids and relevant proteohormones in healthy male volunteers.
    J Sulcova, R Hampl, M Hill, L Starka, and A Novacek
    Clin Chem Lab Med, January 1, 2005; 43(2): 221-7.


    Epitestosterone is generally considered an "anti-androgen" because it doesn’t poses significant androgenic/anabolic activity.

    -Pp
    LMAO. You are still quoting the same transdermal study. Transdermal application of 7OXO is not relevant to oral use.

  8.  06-12-2008  12:55 AM
    Board Sponsor Primordial Perf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,832
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1849

    Originally Posted by Designer Supps View Post
    Actually you were the only one who came to that conclusion.
    Really?

    I remember you saying you “dont recommend [7OH] for PCT”. Is this because you know it suppresses the HPTA?

    It’s funny you’re mentioning 7-oxo studies now. Earlier you refused to acknowledge the relationship between 7OH, 5AT and 7-oxo. I guess whatever’s convenient for you eh?

    -Pp
    www.primordialperformance.com
    Please no PM's. I don't check them often. If you want a fast response please email me, or get in touch with one of the PP reps. I don't get on the forums often, so if I don't respond to your post, please don't be offended. -eric

  9.  06-12-2008  01:15 AM
    Board Sponsor Primordial Perf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,832
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1849

    Originally Posted by Designer Supps View Post
    LMAO. You are still quoting the same transdermal study. Transdermal application of 7OXO is not relevant to oral use.
    The transdermal studies are relevant because they give a very clear picture of what happens when these DHEA metabolites get into the system (an amplified result of what happens when administered orally).

    Read the full text of any oral 7-oxo study. You will see the same general trend of reduced sex hormones, including a reduction in total Testosterone. It may not be significant enough to put in an abstract, but it’s a reduction of Testosterone none the less. This is enough to make me not want to use it for PCT, when minimizing suppression of the HPTA is critical.

    Phosphatidylserine has a clear benefit of being able to suppress cortisol release, while simultaneously increasing testosterone production. (This is at least a step in the right direction)

    If you have more studies or in-house blood tests for DHEA metabolites, feel free to post them up. As far as I can tell all the research has been laid on the table. At this point, it’s ultimately the consumer’s decision.

    -Pp


    Safety and pharmacokinetic study with escalating doses of 3-acetyl-7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone in healthy male volunteers.
    M Davidson, A Marwah, RJ Sawchuk, K Maki, P Marwah, C Weeks, and H Lardy
    Clin Invest Med, October 1, 2000; 23(5): 300-10.
    www.primordialperformance.com
    Please no PM's. I don't check them often. If you want a fast response please email me, or get in touch with one of the PP reps. I don't get on the forums often, so if I don't respond to your post, please don't be offended. -eric

  10.  06-12-2008  02:09 AM
    Registered User Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    USA
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,016
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    697

    Originally Posted by Primordial Perf View Post
    Phosphatidylserine has a clear benefit of being able to suppress cortisol release, while simultaneously increasing testosterone production. (This is at least a step in the right direction)

    Whoa, whoa, whoa, so PS is a test booster now?


    Studies please.

    And if you are using "HORMONAL EFFECTS OF PHOSPHATIDYLSERINE DURING 2-WKS OF INTENSE WEIGHT TRAINING" please provide the full text, I can't even access the abstract.


    Thanks

  11.  06-12-2008  02:47 AM
    Board Sponsor Primordial Perf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,832
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1849

    Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, so PS is a test booster now?


    Studies please.

    And if you are using "HORMONAL EFFECTS OF PHOSPHATIDYLSERINE DURING 2-WKS OF INTENSE WEIGHT TRAINING" please provide the full text, I can't even access the abstract.


    Thanks
    Yes, but PS’s ability to increase testosterone is secondary in action. For instance, if you’re under any kind of physical or mental stress, PS will mitigate the drop in testosterone associated with the rise in cortisol… or perhaps increase testosterone if you’re suppressed from chronically high cortisol levels.

    -Pp

    Here is the abstract -

    HORMONAL EFFECTS OF PHOSPHATIDYLSERINE DURING 2-WKS OF INTENSE WEIGHT TRAINING
    [Annual Meeting Abstracts]
    Fahey, T. D.; Pearl, M.
    California State University, Chico

    A double-blind, crossover design study, measured the effects of 800 mg/d soybean derived phosphatidylserine (PS) or placebo (C) during 2-wk intense weight training on cortisol (CT), adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), testosterone (TS), luteinizing hormone (LH), well-being (WB), and muscle soreness (MS) in 11 trained males. Subjects did 5 sets of 10 repetitions of 13 exercises, 4 times/wk for 2, 2-wk periods (3-wk recovery). Venous blood was sampled 6 mornings (T1-T6) and 15-min following the 8th work-out (T7). WB and MS were estimated using 10-point scales. CT was the same in PS and C in T1-T6 but decreased between T6 and T7 in PS (15.6 ± 1.7 to 10.0±0.9μg/dL, mean±SEM, P<0.05) but not in C. ACTH did not change in PS in T1-T7 but increased in C between T4 and T5-7 by over 50%. TS increased in PS between T1 (3.3±0.3 ng/mL) and T3 (4.4±0.5 ng/mL) and fell in both treatments between T3 and T7 (3.3±0.3 ng/mL, PS; 3.3±0.4, C). LH increased significantly between T1 (1.5±0.1 mlU/mL) and T6(2.2±0.3 mlU/mL) in PS but did not change in C. WB was greater in P than C in T2-T6. In C, WB at T3 was markedly depressed (4.9±0.8). MS increased in both treatments and was greater in C than PS at T2 (61%) and T5(55%). Cortisol decreased in PS after exercise, possibly by depressing ACTH. PS attenuated the negative effects of intense weight training on perception of well-being and muscle soreness
    www.primordialperformance.com
    Please no PM's. I don't check them often. If you want a fast response please email me, or get in touch with one of the PP reps. I don't get on the forums often, so if I don't respond to your post, please don't be offended. -eric

  12.  06-12-2008  01:11 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by Primordial Perf View Post
    Really?

    I remember you saying you “dont recommend [7OH] for PCT”. Is this because you know it suppresses the HPTA?

    It’s funny you’re mentioning 7-oxo studies now. Earlier you refused to acknowledge the relationship between 7OH, 5AT and 7-oxo. I guess whatever’s convenient for you eh?

    -Pp
    What I said was LX was not created as a PCT product although it can be used since it increases total testosterone, free testosterone, lowers estrogen, lowers cortisol, increases lean mass, decreases fat mass and helps to prevent futrure gains of fat. It doesnt suppress HPTA and you dont have a single study to show that it does. I dont sell hormones or products that suppress HPTA so I dont see the need in coming out with a product specifically to remedy that situation. However LX will work very well during PCT.

    You were the one who said the compounds were the same. I have repeatedly said that they are different. Since you dont understand the difference I can still prove that you are wrong just by using all of the 7OXO studies.

    Transdermal use isnt relevant because it prevents 7oxo from going through the liver. Its a HUGE difference but since you dont understand how these compounds work its easy to see why you are so confused.

  13.  06-12-2008  01:22 PM
    Registered User gibbob2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Stats
    6'0"   lbs.
    Posts
    419
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    272

    wow, am I the only one looking at this thinking it'a a bit immature? I think this sets in stone the fact that I will never buy a designer supplement product. I don;t even know what the hell you guys are talkign about, but even I can tell that you are going back and forth. Perhaps you BOTH have good supplements?

    E L E

  14.  06-12-2008  01:23 PM
    Board Sponsor Primordial Perf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,832
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1849

    Originally Posted by gibbob2 View Post
    wow, am I the only one looking at this thinking it'a a bit immature? I think this sets in stone the fact that I will never buy a designer supplement product. I don;t even know what the hell you guys are talkign about, but even I can tell that you are going back and forth. Perhaps you BOTH have good supplements?

    E L E
    nuff said.

    -Pp
    www.primordialperformance.com
    Please no PM's. I don't check them often. If you want a fast response please email me, or get in touch with one of the PP reps. I don't get on the forums often, so if I don't respond to your post, please don't be offended. -eric

  15.  06-12-2008  01:38 PM
    Registered User joebo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,075
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1124

    Designer Supplements has been around for a long time now and has produced many great products. He is trying to debunk information which is being presented by PP for the good of the board. I would side with Designer any day of the week over a new company like PP. And no one is debating if the products are good or not, but rather the information the PP is selling products by and saying it is so much better than LX when there is no science to back it up.

  16.  06-12-2008  01:53 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by joebo View Post
    Designer Supplements has been around for a long time now and has produced many great products. He is trying to debunk information which is being presented by PP for the good of the board. I would side with Designer any day of the week over a new company like PP. And no one is debating if the products are good or not, but rather the information the PP is selling products by and saying it is so much better than LX when there is no science to back it up.
    Exactly.

  17.  06-12-2008  02:04 PM
    Registered User vpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Stats
    5'11"  180 lbs.
    Posts
    341
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    820

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by joebo
    If you could choose just one fat loss product that you have used in the past, what would it be? I'm looking to drop about 7 lbs and looking for a little help in doing so.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted By Designer Supps
    If youre going to be serious about your diet Ill send you a bottle of Adrenalean for free. Try it out and let me know how it worked towards the 7lbs of fatloss. PM me your addy if you are interested.

    Heres where I found this...
    If you could choose only one fat loss product...



    Yeah I would back a company too if they were given me free product. Primordial may be a new company but I have received nothing but good info and results from them...these bros know their stuff

  18.  06-12-2008  02:13 PM
    Registered User joebo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,075
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1124

    I've received free product from a lot of companies and in return have provided negative feedback on these companies. No one is debating the effectiveness of any product, but again the fact that the information that is being given to promote a product is misleading.

  19.  06-12-2008  02:15 PM
    Super Lab Rat Sldge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,651
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3757

    Originally Posted by vpower View Post
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by joebo
    If you could choose just one fat loss product that you have used in the past, what would it be? I'm looking to drop about 7 lbs and looking for a little help in doing so.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted By Designer Supps
    If youre going to be serious about your diet Ill send you a bottle of Adrenalean for free. Try it out and let me know how it worked towards the 7lbs of fatloss. PM me your addy if you are interested.

    Heres where I found this...
    If you could choose only one fat loss product...



    Yeah I would back a company too if they were given me free product. Primordial may be a new company but I have received nothing but good info and results from them...these bros know their stuff
    There is also this:
    Wanna get Adrenalean? Testers Wanted!!

    And a special on Nutraplanet for Adrenalean and a free t-shirt.

  20.  06-12-2008  02:49 PM
    Registered User Squires's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Stats
    6'0"  205 lbs.
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    26
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    74

    There is nothing wrong with free products. What makes all this interesting is after gibbob2 shows support for PP, joebo comes in to support DS. All perfectly fine. However, when it is shown that joebo has a biased opinion, he responds with
    "I've received free product from a lot of companies and in return have provided negative feedback on these companies."
    Which is obviously untrue, shown by his comment 35 minutes earlier.

    But all this is in good fun, so who really cares?

Page 6 of 16 FirstFirst ... 234567891011 ... LastLast

Similar Forum Threads

  1. A2-Receptor Blocker or Cortisol Blocker?
    By OhHaiDare in forum Supplements
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-10-2011, 10:27 PM
  2. Best cortisol blocker?
    By Nate101 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-04-2010, 04:20 AM
  3. PCT and Cortisol Blocker
    By bmw8591 in forum Post Cycle Therapy
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 11:26 AM
  4. Cortisol Blocker
    By firewalker24 in forum Post Cycle Therapy
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-25-2009, 09:26 PM
  5. Cortisol Blocker
    By Lene28 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-09-2009, 11:52 PM

Tags for this Thread