i was just wondering, is there a difference between CELs H-drol and Fast Action pharmas H-drol
I have heard bad things about fast action.Cel's H-drol is the way to go.
What things have you heard about fast action?
Not good things,someone posted on here(please) read my crap experience,or something along those lines.He was taking for a while and got nothing,others said the same.You can search and read it.Cel's have had some scares,but they have been straightened out.Their m1-4add was bunk,if you have it,you can send it in for another bottle.They test for purity,their very reputable,and others will say the same.
yeah, i was wondering, whats the difference between the two formulas?
They should be the same,formula wise...........cel is a more reputable company
from what I've read on the threads here more people on this forum prefer CEL products.
They test for purity,they have a certificate of verification on their site(i've heard)If they have any issues,they adress them and handle them like true business people,making sure the customer is happy(not a sup company trait).I don't know what else to say.
i just looked at both formulas...
CEL= 4-chloro-17a-methyl-androst-1,4-3,17Bdiol:99% purity
Fast Action= polydehydrogenated, polydroxylated halomethetiollocholane
Whats the difference and why arnt they written the same?
Theirs many ways to write and say these damn formulas.They are both halodrol-50 clones.
Chlorodrol 50 is a great clone, H Drol is cheaper though. Keep in mind though it's nice to save money but sometimes you get what you pay for. If past batchs were bunk, you might wanna stay with a company with a good history over one that's nice to the customers. Although it sounds like CEL has fixed their issues.