Do pro BBers cycle?

Page 3 of 3 First 123

  1. I like that "mass with class"!


  2. very interesting thread.
    •   
       


  3. Quote Originally Posted by vassille View Post
    In todays time most pros have ****y genetics buddy that's why they abuse all kind of sutff. In arnold days they didnt
    If you look at some pros all they look is like a big glab of muscle. That;s not bodybuilding... they have little definition or cuts and they look like baloons. That's a joke
    Only the very elite can get that huge and look defined, ex. Phil, Kai, Jay, etc.

  4. Quote Originally Posted by R1187 View Post
    Or are they "on" just about all the time?

    Sorry if dumb question, yes I know they use but just curious how often.
    This still makes me laugh when I come across it on here...lol
    National Level NPC Competitor
    Sponsored Athlete for Muscle Gauge Nutrition
    www.facebook.com/VanessaValdez.National.Competi tor

  5. I would say blast cruising is mandatory for pros. I personally know a guy with his pro card that cruises on what most people would consider for a cycle.
    •   
       


  6. Quote Originally Posted by Jim2542 View Post
    200 pounds at contest weight with 4% bg or 200 at the end of a bulk with 10+%? Because those two are very different things.
    I know this was posted a while ago...but I have to say...

    if you are 200+ @ 5'8" and around 10-12% BF naturally?!?!?! You are doin GREAT! At that weight, you'd be ripped! Those guys on stage aren't exactly 4% BF, they might be 6-8%, but at 250+lbs, you don't have to be near as low in BF to look ripped.

  7. Quote Originally Posted by Jay888999 View Post
    1-Well yeah thats one of the reasons i believe jay was wining,decent genetics and plenty of mass,whihc is what judges love.they love mass,so I agree 100%

    2-again i agree 100%..i know guys at my gym juicing for years and years compete diet and all that good ****.yet,they will never even be close to what these mr o guys are.. I have decent genetics,but if I juiced,it wouldnt work and I know that..My bro,great genetics if he was to juice and would have as a teen when he started training,i will tell ya i guarantee he would proba be a competitor in the ranks of the mr o.he symmetry is amazing and size..hes all natural and is a genetic freak.hes one of the few.

    3-drugs will help to show size,but thats with anyone.What gives these bodybulders the feaky look these days is the most anabolic substance out there,INSULIN,which plays a big part. but if you dont have the symmetry and the shape,you dont have it and never will.anyone can get big to an extent that is.
    I have ideal shape, but not size. Yet, I'm only 5'5", so 160lbs on me really looks like 200lbs on a 6' man. I'm convinced that I could do well enough to have fun and be competitive at 185lbs lean. I'd likely have 19" arms at that weight, which isn't Mr. O size but it's enough to enjoy being on stage with other guys in my class.

    So for the shorter guys, I'd say don't lose heart. 200lbs is more than enough to dominate the 212 if you are a short fella.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Jay888999 View Post
    IDk if i fully agree with that.It doesnt necesarily matter how much gear you do...even with more gear if your ****ty you are ****ty.. all these guys are on **** loads of stuff and basically year round,no cycling....

    dave palumbo,nothing could save this poor guy,lol

    Shawn Ray

    I can guarantee you what they run gear wise isnt to different. gear cant make up for ****ty genetics... IMO jay cutler is one of the ****test Mtr O's of all time,well the ****tiest,imo,lol
    hes like a box and always looks like hes holding weater..heis genetics are not good,again,IMO
    Lmao Dave Palumbo looks like complete ****. Poor guy

  9. Quote Originally Posted by Brandon0212 View Post
    Lmao Dave Palumbo looks like complete ****. Poor guy
    Are any of us in better shape than he was in his prime?

  10. Quote Originally Posted by fueledpassion View Post

    Are any of us in better shape than he was in his prime?
    Depends on what you consider in shape.

    I'm sure my 100M and 2 mile times are both faster.

  11. Quote Originally Posted by jimbuick View Post
    Depends on what you consider in shape.

    I'm sure my 100M and 2 mile times are both faster.
    Not performance, but "shape", literally.

    Thats what bodybuilding is about -shape, which I understand that there is a smaller crowd of non-BB'ing athletes in here in whose case I wasnt directing that towards.

    I find it hard to say anything negative about a man that probably achieved more than I ever will in the area of muscle gain/fat loss. The question was to encourage others to stop being so critical.

  12. Quote Originally Posted by fueledpassion View Post

    Not performance, but "shape", literally.

    Thats what bodybuilding is about -shape, which I understand that there is a smaller crowd of non-BB'ing athletes in here in whose case I wasnt directing that towards.

    I find it hard to say anything negative about a man that probably achieved more than I ever will in the area of muscle gain/fat loss. The question was to encourage others to stop being so critical.
    I know.

    That's why I said this:

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbuick View Post

    Depends on what you consider in shape.
    Because it depends.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. almost 4 weeks into T1 pro/winny cycle
    By hamper19 in forum Cycle Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2012, 02:19 PM
  2. pro-stanivar cycle what do you think?
    By getrdone in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2012, 10:13 AM
  3. pro-stanivar cycle what do you think?
    By getrdone in forum Cycle Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2012, 10:01 AM
  4. How do you think the pro's cycle... they dont
    By BOVEY in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-31-2006, 06:08 PM
  5. So You want to do A PH Cycle?
    By YellowJacket in forum Supplements
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-21-2003, 11:57 PM
Log in
Log in