SERMS Can CAUSE cancer???

  1. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8933
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    SERMS Can CAUSE cancer???


    I was doing some research on SERMS last night and read that in rare cases a side effect can actually be cancer, I know these chemicals are used to treat breast cancer, but the cancer (in rare cases) caused was another type of cancer, the people who reported this where NOT doctors, does anyone know if there is any credit to their report? Please and Thank You

  2. Senior Member
    madds87's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,904
    Rep Power
    98808
    Level
    39
    Lv. Percent
    55.16%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Well SERMS are new anyway, so im sure we dont know alot about them. I would not be surprised.... But there again *anything* causes cancer now-a-days.
  3. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8933
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    yeah....and you can get cancer from just being alive....but Im going to take the risk anyways....Im sure if it where a huge risk people wouldnt be using them left and right for PCT
    •   
       

  4. Banned
    gamer2be08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,988
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    17.08%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Tamox is known to cause liver cancer in some cases...
  5. New Member
    marco wolf's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    354
    Rep Power
    258
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    52.5%

    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    yeah....and you can get cancer from just being alive....but Im going to take the risk anyways....Im sure if it where a huge risk people wouldnt be using them left and right for PCT
    Millions of people still smoke cigs. No risk there, I guess.
  6. New Member
    seunim's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    472
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    80.03%

    I guess you have to weigh the risks. An extremely slim chance of ever getting cancer from this (never once heard of a case), or perhaps shruken balls no sex drive and a limp di*k because of improper PCT.
  7. New Member
    Gator 87's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    414
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    71.25%

    Bear in mind that these studies involved large doses of SERMs for years at a time. 4 weeks of one here and there is very unlikely to hurt you.
  8. New Member
    Lurker27's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  250 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7
    Rep Power
    79
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    42.75%

    Quote Originally Posted by gamer2be08 View Post
    Tamox is known to cause liver cancer in some cases...
    Those cases being most important if you're a rat.


    The hype about SERMs causing cancer fails to account for the ~40x difference in rates of glucuronidation between the species. This limits the amount of the carcinogenic SERM metabolite.


    Fatty liver, however, is a real problem with extended serm usage, and taurine should be taken to combat it.
  9. Advanced Member
    sethroberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    41
    Posts
    863
    Rep Power
    607
    Level
    22
    Lv. Percent
    70.27%

    There are studies in the literature where women have been given tamoxifen for upwards of 5 years continuously with no mention of an increase incidence of liver cancer. The primary concern has always been the induction of endometrial cancer since tamoxifen can have estogenic effects in the uterus (see below). Tamoxifen does have some documented toxic effect on the liver and noone can guarantee that this toxic effect will not ultimatley lead to cancer, however there is no real evidence in the literature outside of animal tests. My opinion is that the "toxicity" of tamoxifen is overblown and that if someone is really concerned, the newer serms seem to have better safety profiles.

    Breast J. 2002 Mar-Apr;8(2):92-6.

    Toxicity of antiestrogens.
    Hirsimäki P, Aaltonen A, Mäntylä E.

    Department of Pathology, Turku University Central Hospital, BioCity, Tykistökatu B.8.6., FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. pirkko.hirsimaki@utu.fi

    Abstract
    The object of this article is to review briefly the preclinical and clinical safety of some antiestrogens. Tamoxifen, toremifene, droloxifene, and idoxifene are polyphenylethylene antiestrogens, whereas the pure antiestrogen, ICI 182,780 or faslodex, as well as raloxifene, is of a different structure. Tamoxifen has been shown to be genotoxic in several studies. It induces unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes and micronuclei in MCL-5 a cells in vitro. Tamoxifen also induces aneuploidy in rat liver in vivo and chromosome aberrations and micronuclei in mouse bone marrow. Toremifene has also shown to be genotoxic, but to a far lower extent, by inducing micronuclei in MCL-5 a cells in vitro and by inducing aneuploidy in rat liver in vivo. Tamoxifen has been shown to be hepatocarcinogenic in the rat in at least four independent long-term studies. The initiation of tumors in the rat is the result of metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes to an electrophile(s) that binds irreversibly to DNA. The other antiestrogens have not been shown to be carcinogenic in rodents. In several independent clinical studies, the risk of endometrial cancer has increased among tamoxifen-treated women. After reviewing the available data, the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there was sufficient evidence to show that tamoxifen is a class I human carcinogen. The increased risk for endometrial cancer occurs predominantly among women who are 50 years old or older and who have been treated with tamoxifen. It is not yet clear whether the uterine tumor formation is a result of genetic mechanisms, analogous to those seen in the rat liver or due to the estrogen agonist action of tamoxifen. However, the other antiestrogens with a more or less similar intrinsic estrogenic potential have not been shown to be carcinogenic in humans.

    PMID: 11896754 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
  10. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8933
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    h......I dont have a uterus anyways so Im not worried about cancer there......and I cant talk Nolva as it competes with recpetors with one of the medications I am taking.......so I am going to take formeston......I read INhibit-e had it in it....but.....inhibit E doesnt have SERM qualities does it?
  11. Professional Member
    hardknock's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  198 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,214
    Rep Power
    18674
    Level
    40
    Lv. Percent
    37.61%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by marco wolf View Post
    Millions of people still smoke cigs. No risk there, I guess.
    ...
    People know that cigs can present fatal health risk, there is a path.

    This path does not exist with serms, to date. I am sure that if 1000 healthy people took a serm and 2yrs later all 1000 developed cancer out of the blue then we wouldn't be having this discussion.
  12. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8933
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    word son
  13. New Member
    marco wolf's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    354
    Rep Power
    258
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    52.5%

    Quote Originally Posted by hardknock View Post
    ...
    People know that cigs can present fatal health risk, there is a path.

    This path does not exist with serms, to date. I am sure that if 1000 healthy people took a serm and 2yrs later all 1000 developed cancer out of the blue then we wouldn't be having this discussion.
    I've nothing against SERM's. My statement was more a comment on basing one's actions on what other people do as opposed to evidence.


    Im sure if it where a huge risk people wouldnt be using them left and right for PCT
    This is obviously a false statement as there will always be people who will take risks, especially if there are certain benefits associated with said risks.
  14. Advanced Member
    ohiostate2827's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    798
    Rep Power
    56594
    Level
    24
    Lv. Percent
    71.81%

    watching porn causes cancer
  15. Board Moderator
    Unbreakable
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,818
    Rep Power
    1317970

    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    yeah....and you can get cancer from just being alive....but Im going to take the risk anyways....Im sure if it where a huge risk people wouldnt be using them left and right for PCT
  16. Board Moderator
    Unbreakable
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,818
    Rep Power
    1317970

    Quote Originally Posted by seunim View Post
    I guess you have to weigh the risks. An extremely slim chance of ever getting cancer from this (never once heard of a case), or perhaps shruken balls no sex drive and a limp di*k because of improper PCT.
    They did not "CC" you on the memo?
  17. New Member
    seunim's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    472
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    80.03%

    Must have gone to my junk mail.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. SERMs
    By MarBaSxx in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-19-2010, 09:19 AM
  2. New SERMS for TRT?
    By Random987 in forum Male Anti-Aging Medicine
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-05-2007, 01:25 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-19-2007, 11:55 PM
  4. PCT... SERMs vs. AIs
    By Monolith in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-12-2004, 12:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in