eluruguayo
New member
- Awards
- 0
Hey all.
I know that the conventional wisdom states that fatrotein:carbs should be in a ratio of approximately 30:30:40, or 20:40:40, or any number of other, similar ratios.
Here's the issue, though. About 3 days/week I am running uphill intervals on the treadmill, for a total of about an hour. By the end of the hour, the treadmill's display (which accounts for my body weight, etc.) usually says that I've burned between 1400 and 1600 calories.
The issue is that this is a really big number, relative to my maintenance level (which is currently about 2500 calories).
I.e., if I were to take a rest day, I'd eat ~2500 calories in an approximate ratio between 20/40/40 and 30/30/40.
But, on days when I do intervals, my "maintenance" calories are about 2500 + 1500 = 4000.
So, on those days, I eat 3200-3800 calories (if I'm cutting) or 4200-4500 calories (if I'm bulking).
The question is: How does this affect macro ratios? Where should the extra calories come from?
Here's the way I've been approaching this so far. Basically, I take two extremes, and try to hit the average.
Extreme #1: Preserve the same ratios. In other words, eat the same ratio of F/P/C for the additional 1000 to 2000 calories.
Extreme #2: Pretend that all the running counts as "negative carbohydrates". So, if I burn N calories on the treadmill, subtract N/4 grams of carbs from that day's food.
Here's an example. Let's say that, on a normal day, I eat...
80 grams (720 cal) of fat;
220 grams (880 cal) of protein;
225 grams (900 cal) of carbs.
That's 2500 cals total.
Now, let's say I do an extra 1250 calories worth of running (let's keep the math simple, this is 1/2 of the maintenance cals).
Under extreme scenario #1, I should eat an extra 40g fat, 110g protein, and 112.5g carbs, for the following totals:
120 g (1080 cal) fat
330 g (1320 cal) pro
337.5 g (1350 cal) carb
Under extreme scenario #2, those 1250 calories count as "negative carbs", so I should just replace all of them with more carbs. That's a total of 312.5 *more* grams of carbs, so we have..
80 g (720 cal) fat
220 g (880 cal) pro
537.5 g (2150 cal) carb
Here are the problems I see with both.
#1: Holy crap, 120 grams of fat! 330 grams of protein! for a dude who only weighs about 75 kg. Those seem excessive.
#2: Holy crap, over 500 grams of carbs!
I've been trying to split the difference, so I would eat something like 100 g fat, 275 g pro, and 440 g carb on a day like this. That still produces wonky-looking percentages, though.
Results have been good. I'm not concerned with just "good", though -- I'm concerned with freaking awesome.
What do you guys think?
I know that the conventional wisdom states that fatrotein:carbs should be in a ratio of approximately 30:30:40, or 20:40:40, or any number of other, similar ratios.
Here's the issue, though. About 3 days/week I am running uphill intervals on the treadmill, for a total of about an hour. By the end of the hour, the treadmill's display (which accounts for my body weight, etc.) usually says that I've burned between 1400 and 1600 calories.
The issue is that this is a really big number, relative to my maintenance level (which is currently about 2500 calories).
I.e., if I were to take a rest day, I'd eat ~2500 calories in an approximate ratio between 20/40/40 and 30/30/40.
But, on days when I do intervals, my "maintenance" calories are about 2500 + 1500 = 4000.
So, on those days, I eat 3200-3800 calories (if I'm cutting) or 4200-4500 calories (if I'm bulking).
The question is: How does this affect macro ratios? Where should the extra calories come from?
Here's the way I've been approaching this so far. Basically, I take two extremes, and try to hit the average.
Extreme #1: Preserve the same ratios. In other words, eat the same ratio of F/P/C for the additional 1000 to 2000 calories.
Extreme #2: Pretend that all the running counts as "negative carbohydrates". So, if I burn N calories on the treadmill, subtract N/4 grams of carbs from that day's food.
Here's an example. Let's say that, on a normal day, I eat...
80 grams (720 cal) of fat;
220 grams (880 cal) of protein;
225 grams (900 cal) of carbs.
That's 2500 cals total.
Now, let's say I do an extra 1250 calories worth of running (let's keep the math simple, this is 1/2 of the maintenance cals).
Under extreme scenario #1, I should eat an extra 40g fat, 110g protein, and 112.5g carbs, for the following totals:
120 g (1080 cal) fat
330 g (1320 cal) pro
337.5 g (1350 cal) carb
Under extreme scenario #2, those 1250 calories count as "negative carbs", so I should just replace all of them with more carbs. That's a total of 312.5 *more* grams of carbs, so we have..
80 g (720 cal) fat
220 g (880 cal) pro
537.5 g (2150 cal) carb
Here are the problems I see with both.
#1: Holy crap, 120 grams of fat! 330 grams of protein! for a dude who only weighs about 75 kg. Those seem excessive.
#2: Holy crap, over 500 grams of carbs!
I've been trying to split the difference, so I would eat something like 100 g fat, 275 g pro, and 440 g carb on a day like this. That still produces wonky-looking percentages, though.
Results have been good. I'm not concerned with just "good", though -- I'm concerned with freaking awesome.
What do you guys think?