- 02-22-2010, 02:46 PM
Just wondering why most people only use this sub-q? I've done a few IM and with a 28g i can barely tell where it was 2 minutes later. I understand it has no site enhancing effects and i've seen literature that gives IM injects quicker dispersion. I dont know why people would only use it sub-q.
(Only doing 100mcg doses ED. Not sure if that would make a difference.)
- 02-23-2010, 05:50 PM
No one knows why there is such a preference for subq?
- 03-11-2010, 10:53 PM
I do it IM in the delt...
03-11-2010, 11:35 PM
03-12-2010, 02:29 PM
I prefer IM, as i seem to get better results that way, however i dont see if its possible to say one is better than another as regards absorbtion.
It takes 16 minutes for me to get a head rush from cjc-1295 IM
19 Minutes if subq.
Gause institute member
Need2slin designer.Product designer/ **** admin.
03-18-2010, 09:38 PM
Thank you all for the help on this. IM slin pins in the quad are so easy i didnt want to change up.
Similar Forum Threads
- By hypotiredRI in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 12Last Post: 05-31-2010, 09:03 AM
- By keith2727 in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 2Last Post: 04-15-2010, 01:40 AM
- By beatupthebeat in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 3Last Post: 02-12-2010, 02:26 PM
- By just93 in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 0Last Post: 12-05-2008, 04:27 PM