- 08-01-2011, 06:32 AM
- 08-01-2011, 06:36 AM
Given that the product is marketed as non-androgenic, it is being sold to women. I would think that women considering buying this product would be grateful that someone has discovered it may contain androgenic compounds (which could cause virilization).
I would also think that those wishing to stay on the right side of the law would be grateful to find out that it may contain controlled substances.
08-01-2011, 09:03 AM
08-01-2011, 09:09 AM
08-01-2011, 09:21 AM
Surely the pressure should be on the manufacturer of the product to demonstrate that it contains what it says it does. This would hardly be the first time a bodybuilding product was found to contain something other than what is on the label.
08-01-2011, 09:35 AM
08-01-2011, 09:41 AM
08-01-2011, 09:45 AM
You'll note that this was the same distracting technique that NTBM/whatever the "sister company" is called tried when confronted with evidence that their Monsterdrol XT wasn't what they said it was. A technique that failed then and made them look very stupid in their "**** you PA thread" (since deleted), and will fail again if you insist on pushing the subject here.Originally Posted by henryv
08-01-2011, 09:47 AM
08-01-2011, 09:57 AM
08-01-2011, 10:03 AM
08-01-2011, 10:11 AM
08-01-2011, 10:13 AM
08-01-2011, 10:26 AM
08-01-2011, 10:30 AM
08-01-2011, 10:40 AM
08-01-2011, 10:45 AM
08-01-2011, 10:50 AM
In my opinion the most damning thing you can say about a company is that what they are selling to consumers is not what consumers think it is. You don't have a problem with saying Taurus is lying about the contents of their product, yet you haven't seen any proof? I just think if someone was accusing you guys of the same thing without proof you might be a little upset.
Again, not trying to start any type of flame war and I could really care less who "wins" this battle...but as a consumer and supplement user I think I'm entitled to more than just rumor on something as serious as this accusation.
08-01-2011, 10:58 AM
Let me be clear here. It is not the issue of "bringing it up" that was dishonorable, it was the manner (un backed inuendo and "Don't hold me responsibile. I'm just saying" thing that IMO is "dishonorable." Then rather than come up with something to challenge the validity of my position you 1) Try to dismiss it as an Emotional Appeal (Heartwarming, I believe was the term you used), 2) Then you feigned being personally offended (at least I hope you were feigning, because if some one who holds no real meaning in your life describing your behavior in an unfavorable gets to you, then you have much bigger issues then WTF is in 7 Keto.) 3) I try to clarify that I was describing the behavior and not you personally and you "read between the lines" as you put it, being all offended. (Let me be perfectly clear, I some times describe my own behavior as being "*******ish" because it can be. Does that mean I think I am an *******? Nope, just my behavior can be. In that sense, I most certainly describe some one else as behaving like a slime ball and being weasel like and not be calling them a weasel or slime ball per se. As you noted, I don't know you. 4) Then you try to insult my intelligence by mocking the way I spelled "honour" which is laughable to me in that although no longer used in modern English, it is more than acceptable in olde English and there by technically correct. All of this grand illusion of misdirection (points 1-4) do absolutely nothing to invalidate my description of the way this has been handled nor defend your handling of it.
"I have no credibility? I think a lot of people would disagree with that view. You are certainly entitled to hold that opinion though.
Have a nice day y'all."
In this particular matter, yep. Because you have provided no evidence to back a serious accusation and seem content to engage in misdirection rather than to address the issues with your claims.
You seem to be implying that my wish for you to have a god day was insincere. I assure you, it was not. Why would it be. I hold no grudge against you. No internet spat is worth renting head space over. Just not worth it. I will take your well wishes with a positive attitude and thank you sir, for I intend to have a great day INDEED!
08-01-2011, 11:03 AM
08-01-2011, 11:11 AM
08-01-2011, 11:14 AM
08-01-2011, 11:20 AM
As Henry knows I have been interested in this type of product. I hadn't looked at Taurus as Genomyx are having stock arrive in the UK but it may take longer than I need as I have a photoshoot coming up so the Taurus spray could be in the running as Genomyx won't ship to a customer in England directly.
Maybe it would clear the air if the banter was set aside and if someone explains the potential legal ramifications of each scenario?
As an interested consumer I would be interested in knowing the results. If the results cannot be declared by PA or EPharm rep without facing a possible lawsuit then of course they will not do it, even if an ideal world would met them.
Hypothetically could the person who sent the bottle to PA publish the results on here as they are a paying consumer with no obvious ulterior motive?
Just bringing some rational questions to the table to get to the bottom of this.
08-01-2011, 11:21 AM
08-01-2011, 11:22 AM
Similar Forum Threads
- By Dragon13 in forum Cycle InfoReplies: 61Last Post: 06-26-2012, 07:26 PM
- By henryv in forum E-Pharm NutritionReplies: 76Last Post: 02-25-2011, 09:52 PM