So are we calling this a win for vector, or a win for DC and progressive calories? It seems that claims of impressive weight and strength gain have been upheld? Seems to me now this is done we’re still none the wiser really? Interested in the OPs thoughts and feeling as to vectors contribution?
Looking at his stats throughout his run, this was his progression:
96.5% top muscle quality, 10.2% body fat, weighing 208.2 lbs...
96.5% top muscle quality, 11.5% body fat, weighing 216.8 lbs...
93.4 % top muscle quality, 14.2% body fat, weighing 219.2 lbs...
92.4 % top muscle quality, 14.0% body fat, weighing 220 lbs...
89.9 % top muscle quality, 12.2% body fat, weighing 224 lbs.
I think he would definitely agree he went too ham on the calories to begin the program. Neither Vector nor any natural supplement is going to allow you to be at an excessive caloric surplus without gaining a large % of fat. That said, I’m confused by the Skulpt stats. I don’t understand how top quality muscle continued to decrease every time while body fat went up and down. I don’t understand how he gained 4 pounds in the last couple weeks and lost nearly 2% body fat, but still decreased top quality muscle? I guess we have to accept that it’s an imperfect measuring system, like most body composition devices.
As for Vector’s help in all of this? There are waay too many variables, with drastic caloric increases to macro changes to DC programming to really put a finger on what did what. Could Vector have supplied a bit of a boost along the way? Yes. But there’s not anything in here that’s going to give you a definitive answer.
Another solid log, another ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ answer to a natty supplement. In summary, use natty supps if you want to use them, but don’t expect them to work like SARMS, PHs or AAS.