I don't agree with the generalization about our age.I'm gonna be 36 in 2 months and I'm very muscular.it's staying conditioned-lean is what is a lot harder IMO.I worked hard busting my ass to get the mass I have(loving to eat helped)and holding onto it so far has been acheived.I know it will get harder but I think by time I hit 40 hrt will help a lot.I have no idea what my T-levels are BTW but I bet they are higher than what you posted,because it seems to make sense.Sorry to hear about your situation but if you can get into hrt and if you use GH and Test you can definitely improve your physique.Other options and methods can help as well.Good Luck and stay positive by searching for and trying possible solutions.peace. :squat:
sorry for the misunderstanding , I was just basically confirming what b150 said. yes its pretty general statement as the avg total test for men in the mid 30's on up normally declines 1 to 2% a yr.
You personally could def. be on the high end of avg or above, as well as other men on the forum(there can also be guys in thier teens and 20's under 400)!
I can still carry the same amount of muscle mass(or close to it) as I had when I was a teenager, I just meant the avg guy in his middle yrs would not be able to maintain the overal mass ,bf level, hardening effect ect from his supplement spike as would a young man with a naturally higher testosterone level.
This why sometime you see a pro bodybuilder look 20 to 30 lbs lighter after coming off his gear durring the offseason while carrying more bf and looking soft.. He just does not make enuff testosterone to support most of that mass(if most of it was created using high levels of artificial means)
So basically what I was trying to say is that if someone with a baseline level of 400 put on 5 lbs of lbm using a testosterone spiking agent, he would most likely retain less of those gains then someone who's normal baseline is double that!
Also 400 total is not a death sentence lol, most dr's wont prescribe you hrt till your in the mid to low 300's..