I've searched through posts on this forum as well as others and haven't really got a clear answer, so I apologize if this has been discussed to death and appreciate a link to any discussions that I couldn't find.
As an example, let say I wanted to start out with something like Boladrol or SD and bridge that into an epistane cycle. Is the whole point to start out with a wet compound, or at least more potent compound, and bridge it into a less side-causing-compound to hold onto initial gains and to dry/harden up?
I've seen many make arguments for both sides for bridging and then others just say to scrap the SD or whatever and run a longer cycle of something like epistane. I'm curious to hear what others experiences have been using the concept of bridging to see if it is worth it or not.
As an example, let say I wanted to start out with something like Boladrol or SD and bridge that into an epistane cycle. Is the whole point to start out with a wet compound, or at least more potent compound, and bridge it into a less side-causing-compound to hold onto initial gains and to dry/harden up?
I've seen many make arguments for both sides for bridging and then others just say to scrap the SD or whatever and run a longer cycle of something like epistane. I'm curious to hear what others experiences have been using the concept of bridging to see if it is worth it or not.