Dizzy2Dizzy
New member
- Awards
- 0
When comparing the efficacy of the most potent sarms and prohormones which wins the race in bodybuilding and which comes with more side effects?
And you dont think there are any bodybuilders using some of these compounds for comp?Read your question To yourself out loud and think about how it sounds, sarms, prohormones and bodybuilding....... theres nothing wrong with sarms or prohormones. But bodybuilders use steroids
no. not really. I mean amateur guys and hobbyist do.. But inside the real world of BBing, not so much. I am going out on a limb and guessing your definition of PH may be misaligned.And you dont think there are any bodybuilders using some of these compounds for comp?
Training, diet, etc no matter how adequate ur gonna stay at natty potential, the drugs do matter if they didnt you wouldnt be commenting about itLgd Has the most potential to build muscle for a sarm, out of the true prohormones theres only 1 and 4 andro for size. The most potent means nothing, Muscles built through diet and training and that's ninety nine percent of the battle. It's always the guy's looking for the strongest This or the strongest that never make any progress. Because they're too worried about the things that don't matter
Whatever it is im not a IFBB pro and the efficacy of PHs is established thus there must be some use for them whatever it is probably has less side effects then 1g tren+test a week. Are PHs that bad that theyre not worth taking over sarms or is there a select few.no. not really. I mean amateur guys and hobbyist do.. But inside the real world of BBing, not so much. I am going out on a limb and guessing your definition of PH may be misaligned.
true PH are not super active on their own until they are converted in the body.
Things like DMZ and Msten are NOT PHs.
Smonts head is exploding RN.Training, diet, etc no matter how adequate ur gonna stay at natty potential, the drugs do matter if they didnt you wouldnt be commenting about it
Whatever it is im not a IFBB pro and the efficacy of PHs is established thus there must be some use for them whatever it is probably has less side effects then 1g tren+test a week. Are PHs that bad that theyre not worth taking over sarms or is there a select few.
i know, just feel like there has to be a couple of each category (PH/SARMS) that can reach the same strength/building muscle potential at high doses with less potential of bodily harm as light AASs - Anavar, clen, test undecanoate, etc. Even if it means combating certain affects from these compounds with AIs, SERMS, or whatever on and after cycle.Smonts head is exploding RN.
He already said:
"Lgd Has the most potential to build muscle for a sarm, out of the true prohormones theres only 1 and 4 andro for size. "
And as I said if you are an amateur or a hobbyist you may find some benefit. We are mainly trying to tell you that if you want to be a bber then you will likely want to use real gear. far cheaper far safer and these days easily attained
well that is the problem.. SARMs are legitamate watered down steroids. Generally very weak in action with few exceptions.i know, just feel like there has to be a couple of each category (PH/SARMS) that can reach the same strength/building muscle potential at high doses with less potential of bodily harm as light AASs - Anavar, clen, test undecanoate, etc. Even if it means combating certain affects from these compounds with AIs, SERMS, or whatever on and after cycle.
I invented the piano key neck tie!!!
Sometimes I just want to stand up from the rocking chair and shake my cane; it’s not really about whether they listen, just me making noise
Funny because it’s so true. People want it all, want it now, and they damn sure don’t want to suffer for it. They want a unicorn.1999
Person A
"I'm only going to run one cycle, just one and done. I still live at home so I can't pin and I am considering Anavar or Dbol. Which one is best? I don't want gyno and I don't want to loose my gains. Is milk thistle and chrysin enough for PCT?"
2024
Person A's son:
"Which sarm is the strongest but causes no shutdown, does not require a serm, and of course I want to lose absolutely no hair?"
I remember doing a 10 week training cycle where I raised my squat 1RM from 485 to 490. I had done plenty of oral cycles but was not using any anabolics at that time. I repeated the same training cycle, busted my ass again, this time taking 30mg of Ostarine. I added several lbs of bodyweight even. I went for 500lbs at that next competition and missed it, failing 2 attempts at it.OP ask yourself: If they are as strong as AAS, safer, and far less legally risky why are people(the vast majority and anyone serious about competing) still using gear??????
I'm not saying no one who competes uses them, and they ARE stronger than 100% natty, but they simply will not take someone far when competing.
Sometimes I just want to stand up from the rocking chair and shake my cane; it’s not really about whether they listen, just me making noise
Funny because it’s so true. People want it all, want it now, and they damn sure don’t want to suffer for it. They want a unicorn.
I remember doing a 10 week training cycle where I raised my squat 1RM from 485 to 490. I had done plenty of oral cycles but was not using any anabolics at that time. I repeated the same training cycle, busted my ass again, this time taking 30mg of Ostarine. I added several lbs of bodyweight even. I went for 500lbs at that next competition and missed it, failing 2 attempts at it.
I couldn’t even get 5lbs on my squat out of 30mg of Ostarine for 2 months. That told me everything I needed to know.
I cant say real AAS is easily obtained. I have been bodybuilding for many years and have yet to find a reputable source for AAS in Canada, but it is easy for me to find numerous legitimate sarms providers. I am much more worried about getting bunk AAS than bunk sarms.Smonts head is exploding RN.
He already said:
"Lgd Has the most potential to build muscle for a sarm, out of the true prohormones theres only 1 and 4 andro for size. "
And as I said if you are an amateur or a hobbyist you may find some benefit. We are mainly trying to tell you that if you want to be a bber then you will likely want to use real gear. far cheaper far safer and these days easily attained
Aren't steroids legal to posses in Canada but illegal to sell. I could be wrong because I live in the us. If that's the case why not order online? Lots of boards have open source posting for gear.I cant say real AAS is easily obtained. I have been bodybuilding for many years and have yet to find a reputable source for AAS in Canada, but it is easy for me to find numerous legitimate sarms providers. I am much more worried about getting bunk AAS than bunk sarms.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie questions Sarms/PCT | Anabolics | 7 | ||
First Cycle of Sarms Question | Peptide/Research | 21 | ||
SARMS QUESTION: Stacking LGD & RAD. Good or Not? | Anabolics | 6 | ||
PCT Questions- SARMS | Anabolics | 8 | ||
Question about prohormones and SARMS | Anabolics | 40 |