Pelosi is sooooo funny

EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says that while critics may quibble with some elements of spending in the $819 billion economic rescue plan, Democrats were willing to act — and Republicans were not.
Discussing the plan that the House approved on a strictly party line vote, Pelosi acknowledged Republican criticism that large sums of money are set aside for favored Democratic programs such as aid to education and Medicare. But she said "we are definitely stepping up to the plate to say we'll be accountable."
"quibble with some elements" is disagree with more than half of the spending (the congressional budget office says only 60% of the money in this bill will have impact by the end of 2010, not exactly fast action)

and even more comical "we are definitely stepping up to the plate to say we'll be accountable." Note - not that they are stepping up to the plate to BE accountable, they'll start that journey with just "saying" they'll be accountable. maybe by 2012 they'll be ready to actually be accountable.
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
What is sad is much of this will have little effect but it will seem like it does.

The natural progression of a recession is too come out after everything de-leverages. It will happen regardless.

They introduce this bill, a year from now we come out naturally and people will think this actually had something to do with it.



Just think of this. About 1/10th of this is for actual infrastructure which is supposed to be the big job generator. The Big Dig in Boston cost 22 billion and at its peak only employed an extra 5k workers. Please tell me how this will create 4 million jobs?


To put this in perspective, even if the whole 880 billion were to create 4 million jobs, you are spending $220,000 for EACH job created.

Politics at its best. Its a ****in joke.
 
thenatureboy

thenatureboy

New member
Awards
0
This will only de-value the dollar and cause hyper-inflation. So start saving your money now.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
This will only de-value the dollar and cause hyper-inflation. So start saving your money now.
no the answer is go deeper in debt now buying investments and real property, because the value of your debt will go down with inflation......

 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
comically if you could take out a real estate loan today on some beachfront property, it would work out quite well. the value of the loan will go down with inflation, and because there is no new shoreline made the value of the property should (over time) go up faster than inflation :D
 

futurepilot

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Who is this really supposed to "bailout", there's earmarks in this bill for an anti-smoking campaign, I mean come on.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Why its supposed to create (or save) 3 million jobs over the next well errr ummm maybe 6-10 years. Thats why its critical we just pass it today without arguing about little details! Why its possible that as many as 40-50% of the new jobs created could come within the next 2 years. That could be as much as hmm reversing 3 months of unemployment claims. For more money than the entire federal budget for a year.
 
CDB

CDB

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
Disagree on one crucial point: this will have a very great effect... in laying the foundation for the next set of hyper spending/malinvestment and subsequent resource misallocations which will have to be washed out in another recession a few years from now.

What is sad is much of this will have little effect but it will seem like it does.

The natural progression of a recession is too come out after everything de-leverages. It will happen regardless.

They introduce this bill, a year from now we come out naturally and people will think this actually had something to do with it.

Just think of this. About 1/10th of this is for actual infrastructure which is supposed to be the big job generator. The Big Dig in Boston cost 22 billion and at its peak only employed an extra 5k workers. Please tell me how this will create 4 million jobs?

To put this in perspective, even if the whole 880 billion were to create 4 million jobs, you are spending $220,000 for EACH job created.

Politics at its best. Its a ****in joke.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Disagree on one crucial point: this will have a very great effect... in laying the foundation for the next set of hyper spending/malinvestment and subsequent resource misallocations which will have to be washed out in another recession a few years from now.
hehehehee yeah, it just won't have the desired effect, nor will it have a fast effect. but comon, lets all work together and throw out the failed policies of george bush
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
Disagree on one crucial point: this will have a very great effect... in laying the foundation for the next set of hyper spending/malinvestment and subsequent resource misallocations which will have to be washed out in another recession a few years from now.
Yes, but that's a given with our current government....bill or not. :D
 
CDB

CDB

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
Yes, but that's a given with our current government....bill or not. :D
This is true. It's amazing how many people swear there's a significant difference between the two major parties when all either does with any consistency is give hand outs to rich pricks and bankers.



hehehehee yeah, it just won't have the desired effect, nor will it have a fast effect. but comon, lets all work together and throw out the failed policies of george bush
Dubya. Always refer to him as Dubya. Otherwise I confuse him with his father, he of the last generation of aviator style eye glass wearers. I'd bring the style back if it didn't make me look like an eighties politician.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
well, does this count as Obama one-upping pelosi?

President Barack Obama said Monday that "very modest differences" over a massive package to revive the economy should not delay its swift passage
Is the package so urgent that a week of debate will ruin its effect? no, not at all. And had he wanted a quick passage he would have conferred with republicans during the writing of the bill in the first place, rather than trying to railroad it.
 
CDB

CDB

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
As Republicans did and do, the Democrats are trying to use this crisis to get **** passed that otherwise wouldn't have a prayer getting through without serious issues arising. As such Pelosi and Obama are no more stupid trying to pass their socialist tax and spend utopia into existence than Republicans were when they essentially turned the country into a proto police state when the Patriot Act was submitted and passed. In point of fact they're not being stupid or funny, both parties know there's no way in hell most of the crap they want to do would pass under normal circumstances when people aren't panicing. Therefore: get people to panic.

And, bottom line, this package even if stripped of all pork and so called unnecassary spending will do nothing to 'stimulate' the economy. At best it will displace private jobs on a 1:1 basis while delaying the price adjustments up and down the stucture of production that need to be made to correct for all the misused resources and bad debts that exist. In other words at best it will give people 'jobs' digging and refilling holes while prolonging the correction process which is inevitable anyway.

The real solution would be to cut government spending with an axe the size of the moon, to cut the growth of the monetary base, to cut taxes on producers and consumers, and to encourage savings to increase the pool of real loanable funds to justify some of the bullshit that's been taking place. Of course, none of that will ever happen.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
to encourage savings to increase the pool of real loanable funds to justify some of the bullshit that's been taking place. Of course, none of that will ever happen.
its comical that they are complaining and using the fact that americans have started saving more since this economic downturn started as yet another reason we require "fast action to get people spending again"

The real trick for the economic team (lead by the person who doesn't understand self employment taxes apparently) would be to create something around a 6-8% annual inflation rate. That by itself would likely fix the problems faster than this stimulus package. Whether by printing more money or some other artificial mechanisms, it would do more good than dropping a trillion on silliness.
 
RobInKuwait

RobInKuwait

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
If I was going to borrow and spend 1 trillion dollars, I'd cut all corporate taxes, which would stimulate more private sector job growth than any amount of "infrastructure spending".
 
CDB

CDB

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
The problem there is our government never cuts taxes. They defer taxes. To really cut taxesyou'd have to cut spending, which they never do.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
The problem there is our government never cuts taxes. They defer taxes. To really cut taxesyou'd have to cut spending, which they never do.
Thats the piece they don't grasp, and may never. Think of how much faster the GDP could grow if there was no national debt, and a government the size it was (relative to GDP) at the great depression
 
CDB

CDB

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
Thats the piece they don't grasp, and may never. Think of how much faster the GDP could grow if there was no national debt, and a government the size it was (relative to GDP) at the great depression
Debt is and is not a problem. If they would cut the money growth eventually economic growth would make even our current debt manageable and even irrelevant because of increased buying power. It'd get paid down. In fact the tendency before fiat standards was for government debt to rise in war time and fall afterward.

As for their grasp of the concept, I think there's two schools: those that understand how badly they're screwing things up and who just don't give a ****; those who truly don't get the point that money isn't wealth, so constant printing borrowing and confiscating doesn't make society richer, it just moves **** around.

At the end of the day though we all respond to incentives, and the incentive for the government is to sell itself as a source of wealth and prosperity as opposed to the consumption machine it really is. As such all governments follow three steps toward money: they seize the mint; they seize the right to print receipts for the commodity money; they centralize banking operations and suspend redemption of the commodity. Through history every government has followed these steps in this order where possible, and where paper receipts weren't in existence they simply seized the commodity when they felt like it.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
definitely the debt is less a problem than size of government. I believe now we are in the area of over 21% of GDP going into government - a non-growth "industry". at the great depression IIRC it was around 3%
 
RobInKuwait

RobInKuwait

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
definitely the debt is less a problem than size of government. I believe now we are in the area of over 21% of GDP going into government - a non-growth "industry". at the great depression IIRC it was around 3%
Keep in mind that the size of the government more than doubled during the great depression, so you're looking at like 1.5% prior to that.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Beau General Chat 9
Beau General Chat 7
Rugger Politics 26
bpmartyr Politics 2
Politics 1

Similar threads


Top