Get all 1017 pages here:
http://www.box.com/s/f0dec70adbdf1c172a8e
There is also, at the bottom of page 59, verbiage for automatic electronic transfer of funds:
21 ‘‘(C) enable electronic funds transfers, in
22 order to allow automated reconciliation with the
23 related health care payment and remittance ad
24 vice;
Class II Devices would be RFID chips.
Page 58 & 59 says they can access your bank accounts and take your money.
Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.
Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to
attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years.
Specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future.
Page 107 discusses how reconstructive surgery for abnormal tissue caused by trauma or deformities are approved and it won't cover cosmetic surgery for improved appearance of normal tissues.
"The current so-called health care bill in the House of Representatives, on the other hand, is a health care rationing bill. The section on cancer hospitals sets that tone pretty well. Rationing and limiting care is the agenda. On page 425, the bill states that the government will mandate so-called advance-care planning, including instructing and consulting in regard to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
On page 427, the federal government requires a program for orders for the end of life. On page 429, the government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order, and on page 430, the government will specify your level of treatment. The way the bill reads now, almost all decisions will be reviewed by the federal government. These are just a few of my concerns. In summary, I think I know what George Washington would have thought of the bill."
The state is not required to cover dialysis treatments under Medicaid, but Williamson said cuts to the $4.5 million that the state spends on those services would be unrealistic because they would be tantamount to a death sentence for those patients. “I know exactly what happens if you don’t dialysize people,” Williamson said. “They’re dead in two weeks.”
The point I am trying to make is Obamacare says that dilaysis is no longer covered by medicaid. Another thing I said is the government must "approve" of what treatments we can have. Doctors are being required to place every amount of information on patients in a system for the government to review and the Doctors can only do what the government allows, so our lives are officially in the governments hands.
9 Subtitle C—National Medical
10 Device Registry
11 SEC. 2521. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.
12 (a) REGISTRY.—
13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 519 of the Federal
14 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is
15 amended—
16 (A) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub17
section (h); and
18 ( by inserting after subsection (f) the
19 following:
20 ‘‘National Medical Device Registry
21 ‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national med22
ical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the
23 ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and
24 outcomes data on each device that—
25 ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and
VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01000 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:BILLSH3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1001
•HR 3200 IH
1 ‘‘( is—
2 ‘‘(i) a class III device; or
3 ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable,
4 life-supporting, or life-sustaining.
5 ‘‘(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall,
6 in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
7 the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
8 Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordi9
nator for Health Information Technology, and the Sec10
retary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods
11 for—
12 ‘‘(A) including in the registry, in a manner con13
sistent with subsection (f), appropriate information
14 to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by
15 type, model, and serial number or other unique iden16
tifier;
17 ‘‘( validating methods for analyzing patient
18 safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and
19 for linking such data with the information included
20 in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), in21
cluding, to the extent feasible, use of—
22 ‘‘(i) data provided to the Secretary under
23 other provisions of this chapter; and
24 ‘‘(ii) information from public and private
25 sources identified under paragraph (3);
VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:BILLSH3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1002
•HR 3200 IH
1 ‘‘(C) integrating the activities described in this
2 subsection with—
3 ‘‘(i) activities under paragraph (3) of sec4
tion 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk
5 identification);
6 ‘‘(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of sec7
tion 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of
8 drug safety data); and
9 ‘‘(iii) other postmarket device SURVEILLANCE
10 activities of the Secretary authorized by this
11 chapter;
You have to read this very carefully, understand the broad range of applications and know how the government has manipulated legislative language in other laws passed. The third line from the bottom in my above cut/paste is of most concern. What this is open to is any form of surveillance the government...it's THEIR "health care" plan...decides to implement and it doesn't have to have a thing to do with health.
