Really? So USP has sold no products claiming outrageous performance and overhyping it? Then discontinue selling it because people stop buying the bull****... Hmmm wanna talk about douchebaggery how bout "so chignon we had to make it pink " sounds like a douche bag slogan to me .
Considering you are one
First you don't even know how to properly quote someone. That's not the comment I made. Second I have used USP products and that's what I base my opinion off of. Third you you are reacting as well to what you deem as "baseless comments". youre a moron and a hypocrite. They're not baseless when based on experience.
And you're not helping by commenting ?
1) You are free to speculate about the reason Pink Magic was discontinued. For me, it was one of my favorite supplements. And I would pay a premium to get some today.
My original sarcastic comment sure drew alot of defensive reactions with just as little proof to prove it was wrong. If USP loyalists are dumb enough to entertain that then they have customers for life. Enjoy your placebo in a bottle the next time a "pink majic" type product is released by them or an "asteroid" stack is marketed to obviously insinuate that it's has steroidal results. Of course my comments have no base... Other then experience with the products and what's printed by USP ads/claims.
Ok ok before I wipe ill entertain you too little boy. Even went and cropped it for ya
How do you define "over-hyped", particularly in advertising? How would one distinguish between something being "overly-hyped" and merely "hyped"? For that matter, I'm curious to know at what point is advertising for a product deemed suitable and legitimate, and not "hype". When does a product reach the threshold for being "hyped" or "over- hyped"? Who determines that threshold? You? The other guy with poor language skills? And what product is advertised with claims that are not blown somewhat out of proportion? "This product is kind of all right." Seems a waste of money to print that in a magazine.
Being referred to as "the other guy with poor language skills" by a guy with poor reading skills is funny. Examples of what you ask have already been answered but since your comprehension shows to be below par I understand why you decide to continue to take silly jabs and ask more redundant questions. Another moron feeds the thread.
Really? You're going to criticize him for what you deem an improper quotation? Really? Your posts are littered with errors in spelling and grammar, as well as showing a very limited ability to think and communicate, and yet you're going to criticize his use of language? And then you call him a hypocrite? Are you cognizant of the fact that everything you say in the post I quoted is more applicable to you than anyone else in this thread? You're right about one thing, and that is that you are absolutely entitled to your opinion. But it would be better received if you didn't come across like such an ignorant idiot.
Why I continue to take silly jabs? Continue? That was my first post. I couldn't continue to do anything without doing it initially, and that post was the initial action, not the continuance. This post is the continuance. Poor reading skills, indeed. As for these examples of "over-hyping" in advertising (I'm guessing that's what you were referring to since you didn't specify; truth be told, I don't think you understood anything in my initial post), all I saw from you is a comment complaining about the "pink" in Pink Magic and a vague reference to the Asteroid Stack being a suggestion that the product combination will give results akin to steroids. The former has nothing to do with product hype and the latter fails to identify any issue with the actual advertising, only the name. So, no, examples have not been given, but examples alone would have failed to answer my query anyway.
Aww you sound upset .
Do you realize that with each silly picture comment you make you show yourself as more of a hypocrite? If those are to show how you actually feel about the conversation then you wouldn't feel the need to post them. This whole thread boils down to the fact that I have a negative opinion of a supp manufacturer due to my experience with the products and a little group doesn't agree with my opinion and can't just let it be. They didn't work for me and I don't care for them. Some of you have stated the products worked for you and you like them to which my replies to THOSE OPINIONS were congratulations. Others want to attack my writing skills. To bad if my one finger typing on an iPhone doesnt format a reply in a matter that suits you. Feel free to fill out that form and I know you'll copy it for later use. That's ok, it's alot funnier then what you've posted.
Oep and test powder are 2 great products. Modern bcaas aswell c20 was ok not bad though. New oep is better IMO then the old
HAHA!
