Just wondering if anyones going to try to prove it actually works?
No but I figure someone has to test it? Individual results are subjective anyway. What you don't want to see it studied?You said you've noticed continual strength increase since you've started taking it. Do you not trust yourself and what is happening?
Did you just say that you don't trust yourself?No but I figure someone has to test it? Individual results are subjective anyway. What you don't want to see it studied?
I think everyone would love more studies, but a lot of people are recording some awesome results and better bloodwork.No but I figure someone has to test it? Individual results are subjective anyway. What you don't want to see it studied?
What are you talking about(?), nobody said it shouldn't be studied. There are studies being done, but no idea when they would complete or released.No but I figure someone has to test it? Individual results are subjective anyway. What you don't want to see it studied?
Mars, Inc has dozens of patents, and over a hundred published papers regarding cocoa flavanols, and dozens more in the works.Wouldnt hold my breath for one, unfortunately. Unless there is a patent holder on this ingredient (which I dont believe there is) who could fund the study through a major University.
Agreed, now I've got some reading for my down timeGreat post.
no i said no to the question.Did you just say that you don't trust yourself?
niceThere's numerous studies underway for use of (-)-epicatechin to treat age-related muscle loss, muscular dystrophy, etc...
Their relevance to trained athletes is limited of course in the same regard to every other ingredient that works in old frail people but not healthy people in optimal physical shape, but it should provide more clarity as to functional effectiveness of the ingredient.
is that possible if it gets patent approval or whatever?Mars, Inc has dozens of patents, and over a hundred published papers regarding cocoa flavanols, and dozens more in the works.
Big Chocolate gonna take away your supplements.
LOLis that possible if it gets patent approval or whatever?
All of those patents are already granted.is that possible if it gets patent approval or whatever?
Thanks for all the great info.I take it there is no way to tell if my folli product has the synthetic extract?All of those patents are already granted.
It's not really coincidental that nobody is listing extract source for their (-)-epicatechin.
They're either using synthetic epicatechin, or cocoa extract for epicatechin.
One is not DSHEA compliant, the other has to tiptoe around patents, and with numerous people who make the supplement making patented claims they would sort of be screwed either way.
Luckily for consumers, everyone making it is probably too small to get noticed, that said, Mars, Inc does market their CocoaVia product as a supplement, and has sued other companies before over their cocoa extract products.
Indeed not, especially since most companies don't follow label law w/re to labeling plant extracts.Thanks for all the great info.I take it there is no way to tell if my folli product has the synthetic extract?
Hey check your PM.Indeed not, especially since most companies don't follow label law w/re to labeling plant extracts.
e.g. if the (-)-epicatechin in someone's product is a plant extract, they are legally required to list the extract source on the label. But lots of companies ignore that, so unless something is explicitly labeled as an extract, it's a crapshoot.