Cant not drop a single pound, what am i doing wrong?

Page 3 of 3 First 123

  1. Quote Originally Posted by theeboz View Post
    After weight training would 25-30 of low intensity be better for fat buurning weight loss purposes or 15 min of HIIT?
    Or should I stick to low intensity on wieght trainng days and HIIT alone on say my off day or ab day?

    Quote Originally Posted by theeboz View Post
    My schedule with work family and school, does not allow me to split up cardio and weights during the day as some people suggest weights in the morning cardio in the evening, I only have one shot a day to get this done, which is why i do the 6 days a week every morning I try to take advantage of the precious time I do have that's why I do the 2 hours or so.
    well, is it possible to jiggle around 15 minutes for the cardio separately? I'm not sure for instance why you couldn't move around some of the rest of your schedule, even if it means going to bed and waking up a half hour earlier/later? or is it that you feel like you need to do the cardio at the gym vs home?


  2. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    well, is it possible to jiggle around 15 minutes for the cardio separately? I'm not sure for instance why you couldn't move around some of the rest of your schedule, even if it means going to bed and waking up a half hour earlier/later? or is it that you feel like you need to do the cardio at the gym vs home?
    Yeah thats kind of the issue, would prefer to get everyhting done at the gym,more practical as space at the house is limted .

    But your right shouldnt be too hard to make some time, what I meant I dont have the time to make the drive to the gym and do a whole seperate work out of an hour or more but 15-20 minutes shouldnt be tough... like I said whatever it takes.

    Now would you recommend doing some HIIT seprately at night time, or after my weight training?
    For instance what sounds better,
    Weights-cardio-morning... hiit at night or
    Weights-Hitt-morning...or weights alone and some hiit at night
    •   
       


  3. doing 10-15 minutes low to moderate intensity cardio after a workout isn't a bad idea. its a bit of a cool down, a little bit of stretch, and does burn a little bit of calories. then HIIT later. really if you can do past 10 minutes of real HIIT, then you are doing pretty well

  4. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    doing 10-15 minutes low to moderate intensity cardio after a workout isn't a bad idea. its a bit of a cool down, a little bit of stretch, and does burn a little bit of calories. then HIIT later. really if you can do past 10 minutes of real HIIT, then you are doing pretty well
    thanks Im on it!!..gonna rework my methods here and find some good workouts i can do at home with no equipment for the HIIT.

    Any suggestions on that, if not its cool Ill search for some.

    By the way Im gonna PM you about a whole nother subject ..thanks again

  5. just sprinting really works. if you've got a sidewalk with telephone poles, run as fast as you can between one pole and the next, then turn around and walk back to the start. Then repeat. And I mean as fast as you can, no holding back
    •   
       


  6. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    other than the fact that he's wrong, sure. He uses a logic path which makes sense to get there, but real world scientific studies show differently. 2 minutes of REAL HIIT causes as much additional fat burn over 24 hours as 30 minutes of low to moderate intensity does. the HIIT jacks up your metabolism for hours, which is superior for some of what he talks about even in his post. your rate of lipolysis is limited. The energy burned over 24 hours is more important than the energy burned for a half hour.
    Actually easy, we're both right. Lower intensity cardio tends to pull a greater percentage of its energy from fat cells rather than glucose, but higher intensity cardio demands more oxygen and thus burns more fat in the same amiunt of time due to the energy expenditure. Either way is good and effective but the ojly benefit low intensity would have is the fact that u can perform much longer durations of it compared to high intensity.

    So low intensity pulls a greater percentage of fat cells but high intensity has a much greater rate of oxidation thus burning just as much if not more fat cells in the process since considerably more energy is consumed. The point is that cardio is the only effective way to burn fat. Anaerobic exercise is not. And either form of csrdio would be best done in a csrb-depleted state to further accelerate fat burning.

    One substantial benefit of high intensity cardio is vascular density. Vascular density is necessary for muscle growth especially when u r approaching ur genetic limit.

    I did not mean to imply that low intensity is the only way. I'm still learning like everyone else and I promise my source of information is legit like no other. There are just alot of exceptions to every rule in fitness and health.

  7. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    other than the fact that he's wrong, sure. He uses a logic path which makes sense to get there, but real world scientific studies show differently. 2 minutes of REAL HIIT causes as much additional fat burn over 24 hours as 30 minutes of low to moderate intensity does. the HIIT jacks up your metabolism for hours, which is superior for some of what he talks about even in his post. your rate of lipolysis is limited. The energy burned over 24 hours is more important than the energy burned for a half hour.
    Actually easy, we're both right. Lower intensity cardio tends to pull a greater percentage of its energy from fat cells rather than glucose, but higher intensity cardio demands more oxygen and thus burns more fat in the same amiunt of time due to the energy expenditure. Either way is good and effective but the ojly benefit low intensity would have is the fact that u can perform much longer durations of it compared to high intensity.

    So low intensity pulls a greater percentage of fat cells but high intensity has a much greater rate of oxidation thus burning just as much if not more fat cells in the process since considerably more energy is consumed. The point is that cardio is the only effective way to burn fat. Anaerobic exercise is not. And either form of csrdio would be best done in a csrb-depleted state to further accelerate fat burning.

    One substantial benefit of high intensity cardio is vascular density. Vascular density is necessary for muscle growth especially when u r approaching ur genetic limit.

    I did not mean to imply that low intensity is the only way. I'm still learning like everyone else and I promise my source of information is legit like no other. There are just alot of exceptions to every rule in fitness and health.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    other than the fact that he's wrong, sure. He uses a logic path which makes sense to get there, but real world scientific studies show differently. 2 minutes of REAL HIIT causes as much additional fat burn over 24 hours as 30 minutes of low to moderate intensity does. the HIIT jacks up your metabolism for hours, which is superior for some of what he talks about even in his post. your rate of lipolysis is limited. The energy burned over 24 hours is more important than the energy burned for a half hour.
    And regarding the metabolism, that is a good point that I did not consider.

  9. Quote Originally Posted by theeboz View Post
    thanks Im on it!!..gonna rework my methods here and find some good workouts i can do at home with no equipment for the HIIT.

    Any suggestions on that, if not its cool Ill search for some.

    By the way Im gonna PM you about a whole nother subject ..thanks again
    Jump rope, sprinting, combination of body weight movements that will jack your HR up like burpees, you can get creative and do different work outs everyday so you don't get sick of one. If you have a bike that is my favorite, rolling hills...sprint up...recover down, repeat till you fall off.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by fueledpassion View Post
    Correct, low intensity cardio is best for fat-burning. The reason is quite simple.

    Your body cannot break down the fat molecules and use them for energy quick enough for high-intensity exercise such as flat-out running and anaerobic exercise such as heavy, moderate-paced lifting. So instead of pulling from fat reserves, the body actually pulls from glucose reserves for HIT purposes. In fact, the body cannot pull from fat energy in high intensity and anaerobic exercise.

    If the exercise is slow and steady and therefore much less demanding of energy, the body can use fat cells as it's primary source of energy during such. Granted, it can pull from either glucose or fat but this is why I said to train low-intensity after heavy lifting so that your glucose levels are rather low. Otherwise train in the morning before eating, where again the glucose levels are low. It is also important to note that when you lift weights, your body secretes more testosterone, epinephrine and T3 to metabolize fat molecules. This process takes 30-60 minutes to take it's full effect which is another good reason to consider cardio after weight training.

    I'll go ahead and explain briefly why carb cutting is a big no no in bodybuilding. As you can imagine, we need plenty of carbs for the HIT stuff like weight-lifting and circuit training of the sort since our body cannot resort to fat for fuel during this type of exercise. But we also need little to no carbs remaining in the system for cardio in order to pull from fat reserves exclusively. When you cut your carbs, you actually aren't providing greater opportunity for fat burning. Sure, you'll lose weight - just not good weight. If you cut carbs, expect to lose 1 pound of muscle for every 2 total pounds of weight. This is why people generally get weaker on keto and carb-cycling diets. I'd also mention that not only are they catabolic to the skeletal muscles but also the heart, which is dangerous. You should never need less than 1g of carbs per lb of body weight - period. If those carbs are clean, this is more than enough carb cutting to maintain most of your muscle and still effectively burn fat. Honestly, if you have the timing and diet correct, you can bulk and cut simultaneously by targeting fat cell usage at certain times during the day while still eating enough carbs to adequately provide the constant fuel the muscles require. Don't believe me? I've been cutting for 3 weeks now while eating 300+g of carbs every day with my 175g of protein. Granted, I eat very little dietary fats but I replace them with MCT. Anyways, I've gotten leaner and heavier.

    Dieticians never bothered to tell online forums why we should cut carbs or increase carbs depending on our goals. We do all of this to manipulate the insulin to glucagon ratio, which determines everything when it comes to whether or not you build muscle or lose fat. That ratio should change depending on the goal of fat loss or muscle building. Protein and carb intake has a direct relationship with the ratio, so as you can imagine eating a certain ratio of carbs vs. protein can easily put us where we need to be.

    Hope this helps. I long-winded. I know.

    Also, I understand that alot of people on this board do not agree with half the statements above. I can easily find documented studies indicated such results. There are also tons of other sources that explain the metabolic science of the body which you will find is congruent with what I am saying here.
    Actually this is not true, HIIT is the best way to lose fat mass. Yes, low intensity cardio will derive most of its fuel from fat, but the total VOLUME of fat burned is lower than an HIIT workout. HIIT burns more total fat during and also creates an 'afterburn' which elevates metabolism.

  11. Of course fuelledpasion isnt wrong, but I would much rather do 15 minutes of HIIT after lifting (before would f*** me over and ruin my workout haha) than 2 hours low intensity work. And think of all the extra calories you burn at rest afterwards with the heightened metabolism

  12. The article quoted is some pretty old school stuff, athletes have moved into more HIIT based routines for the past several years. To me the proof is in the pudding. Compare a Marathon runner and a Sprinter, immediate conclusions are that both forms of running burn fat but only one burns muscle. My Opinion is that both forms should be used in moderation to help give me more all around fitness, my old body can't take HIIT every day.
    If your truly doing HIIT the advantage is you get a lot more bang for your buck, you can wipe out a big mac in 10-15 min, where steadying jogging is going to take you around 30-40 min. The disadvantage is it is painful!
    IMO combine and moderate=success

  13. Quote Originally Posted by fueledpassion

    Actually easy, we're both right. Lower intensity cardio tends to pull a greater percentage of its energy from fat cells rather than glucose, but higher intensity cardio demands more oxygen and thus burns more fat in the same amiunt of time due to the energy expenditure. Either way is good and effective but the ojly benefit low intensity would have is the fact that u can perform much longer durations of it compared to high intensity.

    So low intensity pulls a greater percentage of fat cells but high intensity has a much greater rate of oxidation thus burning just as much if not more fat cells in the process since considerably more energy is consumed. The point is that cardio is the only effective way to burn fat. Anaerobic exercise is not. And either form of csrdio would be best done in a csrb-depleted state to further accelerate fat burning.

    One substantial benefit of high intensity cardio is vascular density. Vascular density is necessary for muscle growth especially when u r approaching ur genetic limit.

    I did not mean to imply that low intensity is the only way. I'm still learning like everyone else and I promise my source of information is legit like no other. There are just alot of exceptions to every rule in fitness and health.
    That is why 10-20 minutes of low intensity is good right after, to burn up any spare fatty acids currently in bloodstream

  14. I believe the "oxygen" reference is to EPOC correct? Something like exercise post oxygen consumption?

    I go back and forth on hitt vs liss. I really like the bear complex for burning fat, 135lbs for 4x5 and you will be drenched in sweat and lungs on fire if you do it as fast as you can.

  15. Quote Originally Posted by Jiigzz View Post
    Actually this is not true, HIIT is the best way to lose fat mass. Yes, low intensity cardio will derive most of its fuel from fat, but the total VOLUME of fat burned is lower than an HIIT workout. HIIT burns more total fat during and also creates an 'afterburn' which elevates metabolism.
    I mentioned exactly what ur saying sometime later after that post...I am aware of the total volume of fat burned can be hiher with HIIT rather than low-intensity.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    That is why 10-20 minutes of low intensity is good right after, to burn up any spare fatty acids currently in bloodstream
    Good after anaerobic or good after HIIT?

  17. Quote Originally Posted by fueledpassion View Post
    Good after anaerobic or good after HIIT?
    I think just after anaerobic, but it might have some advantages after HIIT, even just as a cool down. 12 minutes of HIIT followed by 15 of LISS doesn't sound bad

  18. Quote Originally Posted by fueledpassion View Post
    I mentioned exactly what ur saying sometime later after that post...I am aware of the total volume of fat burned can be hiher with HIIT rather than low-intensity.
    I read that after I posted haha

  19. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    I think just after anaerobic, but it might have some advantages after HIIT, even just as a cool down. 12 minutes of HIIT followed by 15 of LISS doesn't sound bad
    I did low-intensity cardio for a 1 mile run yesterday morning, followed by 3 pole-to-pole sprints (about 100 yrds each) in HIIT.

    ...I just about died lol. My heart has been out of condition for years now. On a positive note, my legs are so much stronger now than they were years ago and I was fast!
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Powerfull - What am I doing wrong?
    By halljo in forum Supplements
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-21-2006, 12:55 AM
  2. What am I doing wrong? Clogged filter?
    By AgentOrange in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-10-2006, 11:07 PM
  3. injections-what am i doing wrong?
    By jeff33333 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-14-2005, 01:28 PM
  4. What Am I Doing Wrong?
    By Chad in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 05-16-2004, 10:40 AM
Log in
Log in