Boulderer
New member
- Awards
- 0
For the sake of simplicity, let's say you figure out 2000 calories is your maitenance amount. You decide you want to lose some fat but you want to go about it slowly, so you settle on a 1lb a week fat loss goal.
Do you:
A) Reduce your calories by 500 a day. No cardio, just caloric restriction
B) Reduce calories by 250 a day and add in 250 calories worth of cardio
C) No caloric restriction. You bust your ass and burn 500 calories a day worth of cardio.
I constantly hear two different things. One is "It's all diet" and the other is "don't be lazy, do your cardio fatty". So what is it? If the end result is to burn more calories than you put into yourself, does it really matter how you accomplish it?
I loathe cardio. I find it so incredibly boring. I've gone from 23% BF to 13% BF in 3 months without doing any cardio at all, just weights. However, I've hit a wall now and fat loss has seemed to stall. Any thoughts on what I should do? Should I take a month off dieting and eat maintenance levels for a while? My ultimate goal is to get to 10% BF before embarking on a lean bulk.
Do you:
A) Reduce your calories by 500 a day. No cardio, just caloric restriction
B) Reduce calories by 250 a day and add in 250 calories worth of cardio
C) No caloric restriction. You bust your ass and burn 500 calories a day worth of cardio.
I constantly hear two different things. One is "It's all diet" and the other is "don't be lazy, do your cardio fatty". So what is it? If the end result is to burn more calories than you put into yourself, does it really matter how you accomplish it?
I loathe cardio. I find it so incredibly boring. I've gone from 23% BF to 13% BF in 3 months without doing any cardio at all, just weights. However, I've hit a wall now and fat loss has seemed to stall. Any thoughts on what I should do? Should I take a month off dieting and eat maintenance levels for a while? My ultimate goal is to get to 10% BF before embarking on a lean bulk.