Is It Macros Or Total Calories

Page 2 of 2 First 12
  1. Professional Member
    Rugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Rep Power
    Lv. Percent
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    remember that the best dieticians of the 70s and 80s thought that dietary cholesterol affected serum cholesterol, and that low fat diets (below 10%) were better for you... So what todays best dieticians say I also take with a grain (maybe a few grains) of salt. But to inject some comedy

    Was that quote from Independence Day? LOL

  2. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Rep Power
    Lv. Percent
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    close, men in black
    This space for rent

    Phenadrol Log - AMAZING fat loss results so far
  3. New Member
    Sxhawnn's Avatar
    6'0"  257 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Rep Power
    Lv. Percent

    hmmm damn thats lot of info to digest in this thread. If I was the OP i'd be confused as hell by now. LOL I think a little personal experimentation is in order. Just stick to the basics and some common sense and adjust if you don't like to results your getting.

    Eat lean proteins
    Eat good fats
    Watch your carbs
    Don't gorge yourself
    and excersize

    I tried the "scientific route" with the bmi and all the crazy caloric calculations. But at the end of the day, I ended up just eating

    chickenbreast/broccoli/oatmeal/protein shakes

    LOL I am admittedly a noob so maybe this is "noob advice" but so far i'm down 23 pounds and 3 inches on my waist in 6 weeks while i've added 15 pounds to my bench and a 1/2 inch to both my arms. IN MY OPINION, I don't think weight loss is that complicated. Just eat lean and work hard.

  4. Board Moderator
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Rep Power


    You're absolutely right. BMI/BMR are worthless IMO. One does not need to count calories but tracking food intake is at least required. If you are not losing weight, eat less or exercise more or both. If you are losing weight you're doing fine. But that is for weight loss. For those who are over weight and or obese it is indeed very simple.

    The thing with bodybuilding is that nutrition optimizes fat loss as opposed to just weight loss. The idea is to lose only body fat and retain LBM. Calories, macro nutrition, carbohydrates, nutrient timing are critical in the optimization of losing body fat and retaining LMB.

    At the end of the day if I am not a pro or a competitive bodybuilder it is obsessive compulsive behavior...

    ...hence we body build anyway


Similar Forum Threads

  1. questions about Macros/ total nutrtion
    By bigzach1234 in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-12-2009, 11:58 PM
  2. calories/calories from fat/ sugar alcohol
    By stfdkd37 in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 06:48 PM
  3. Total T and Total E both high...
    By RoberG623 in forum Male Anti-Aging Medicine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-28-2007, 09:02 PM
  4. Calories Burned vs calories taken
    By xaktsaroth in forum Bulking
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-24-2006, 10:01 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-18-2005, 12:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Log in
Log in