Body length and strength

  1. New Member
    Dahollow's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    36
    Rep Power
    64
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    99.52%

    Body length and strength


    Hi guys,

    I'm 1m83 and my training partner is 1m62. We both have more than 10years of gym experience.

    My opinion is that he has an advantage over me with the bench press and squats, due to his far shorter arms and legs. Only on those exercises does he come near my strength level.

    The ROM is greater in my case, but he keeps denying it.

    I'm looking for some math to point out who's right, since common sense won't do.

    Thx.

  2. Senior Member
    OrganicShadow's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  162 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,973
    Rep Power
    251878
    Level
    42
    Lv. Percent
    37.53%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Yes, simple physics would explain why David Henry at 5 feet (sorry, im an American) can hammer curl 120s.

    Physics 101:
    Force (F) = Mass (M) x Acceleration (A)
    Work (W) = Force (F) x Distance (D) or W=FxD=MxAxD (Yes! Work makes you mad)

    The key here is distance. As your range of motion increases the distance you need to travel you have to put in more work. The Force is going to be the weight and the speed in which you do your squat. So, theoretically, if both of you are benching 225 at the same speed you're still required to put in MORE WORK giving the SAME FORCE to reach a FURTHER DISTANCE.

    It's also more taxing on your joints. Because they require more Torque (T) or "moment of force' which is the tendancy of force to rotate around an axis (your joints). If T= radius (r) X F in a simple sense then your still putting more torque since (as explained earlier) evein though r is equal F is greater for you.
    By believing passionately in something that still does not exist, we create it. The nonexistent is whatever we have not sufficiently desired.
    Franz Kafka
  3. New Member
    Dahollow's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    36
    Rep Power
    64
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    99.52%

    Quote Originally Posted by OrganicShadow View Post
    Yes, simple physics would explain why David Henry at 5 feet (sorry, im an American) can hammer curl 120s.

    Physics 101:
    Force (F) = Mass (M) x Acceleration (A)
    Work (W) = Force (F) x Distance (D) or W=FxD=MxAxD (Yes! Work makes you mad)

    The key here is distance. As your range of motion increases the distance you need to travel you have to put in more work. The Force is going to be the weight and the speed in which you do your squat. So, theoretically, if both of you are benching 225 at the same speed you're still required to put in MORE WORK giving the SAME FORCE to reach a FURTHER DISTANCE.

    It's also more taxing on your joints. Because they require more Torque (T) or "moment of force' which is the tendancy of force to rotate around an axis (your joints). If T= radius (r) X F in a simple sense then your still putting more torque since (as explained earlier) evein though r is equal F is greater for you.
    Thanks mate! Very good explanation.
    •   
       

  4. purebred
    Guest
    purebred's Avatar

    Excellent explanation. I don't want what I'm about to state to be taken as a shot at the OP (or anyone who doesn't fit the description) but it should be known that the explanation our kind friend was so gracious in provided is not to be used as an excuse for NOT doing something. I'm so tired of hearing people create excuses instead of results. The age-old "I'm an ectomorph/hard gainer" excuse is another that grinds my freaking gears.

    Yes, there are always obstacles whether it be body type, time constraints, and virtually anything else you can think of. It's a part of life and growing up: facing obstacles and overcoming them.

    If you're insulted, you're probably one of the people I'm describing

    Ok. Rant over good thread topic, OP. The explanation was also very concise and easily understandable, Organic. Nice breakdown!
  5. Elite Member
    GeekPoop's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  232 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,263
    Rep Power
    234820
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    92.31%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    bench like a PLer and use a wide stance / low bar placement on your back. problem solved
    Serious Nutrition Solutions
  6. Senior Member
    ZiR RED's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,529
    Rep Power
    297850
    Level
    43
    Lv. Percent
    77.56%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Specific limb length will make a difference too. I have very long arms, a long torso, and short legs...which anthropometrically sets me up to be one hell of a dead lifter, a so so squatter, and one terrible bencher. These things will make a difference, as will rib cage size as well. Having a barrel chest will require a shorter ROM despite arm length.

    Br
  7. Senior Member
    OrganicShadow's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  162 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,973
    Rep Power
    251878
    Level
    42
    Lv. Percent
    37.53%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Im starting to believe size of hands and feet even play a role in a persons ability to control heavier weights. I often struggle with deadlifts, shrugs, and certain dumbbell exercises becuase i have smaller hands. Physically I can handle the weight but my grip cant. Cant provide any science on that one though.

    Glad my explination was insightful.
    By believing passionately in something that still does not exist, we create it. The nonexistent is whatever we have not sufficiently desired.
    Franz Kafka
  8. Advanced Member
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    907
    Rep Power
    643
    Level
    23
    Lv. Percent
    57.39%

    Also fiber pinnation angle and insertion location (moment arm) can influence torque.
  9. Senior Member
    ZiR RED's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,529
    Rep Power
    297850
    Level
    43
    Lv. Percent
    77.56%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by OrganicShadow View Post
    Im starting to believe size of hands and feet even play a role in a persons ability to control heavier weights. I often struggle with deadlifts, shrugs, and certain dumbbell exercises becuase i have smaller hands. Physically I can handle the weight but my grip cant. Cant provide any science on that one though.

    Glad my explination was insightful.
    Foot and toe anthropometrics are correlated with sprinting success as well.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Size/Muscle/Strength with Total Body Routine?
    By redrocket399 in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-30-2009, 05:48 PM
  2. What length of rest is best for hypertrophy/strength
    By ILiftBig in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 02:10 PM
  3. Replies: 59
    Last Post: 10-09-2008, 10:11 AM
  4. wieght gain/loss, strength, body composition
    By realsoundjim in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-07-2004, 10:32 AM
  5. length of real gear vs length of ph's
    By realsoundjim in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-05-2004, 03:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in