I haven had the chance to try either of these, but I can really only afford one or the other. Which would be better? Looking to add some lean mass and maybe a little strength.
Bulk XF, the jury is still out on adrenosterone.
M.Ed. Ex Phys
So far I have yet to see 1 successful report from the bulk adrenosterone, but a number of "no effect" ones... so take that for what its worth. then again, no positive ones on, but its only been available for a short time (not long enough for a full cycle I believe)
This space for rent
Come visit my log http://anabolicminds.com/forum/suppl...-up-level.html
I'd go with the bulk XF. The material is equivanent to the Molecular Nutrition's version and is licensed from us, so you get a top notch product
While I got great effects from Ergo's 11-oxo, I also have not seen a lot of successful logs with the bulk.
The BXF is purchased from MN, so you know the quality is there. I would vote BXF.
Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
BPS - Where Body meets Performance
Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
Listen to the NP king!
Cool thanks for the replies. Yeah, the bulk X-factor is exciting, especially since I never tried X-factor. I think I might go with that. I think in order to make the bulk Adrenosterone work, I would have to add something for absorbtion like Trisorbagen (spelling) or make it into a transdermal.
I've looked at a few studies on andronosterone, and while I'm not expert it seemed to have almost no scientific support. (e.g. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/en...ubmed_RVDocSum )
Personally I'd try XFactor before Andreno (Who knows, if I win that picture contest i just might be able to !
Maybe you will Steve, maybe... You... Will :P Just post 1 a day and you increase your chances