What is the difference. Is Superdrol-NG have the same ingreadients as the orginal product? How does it compare to 3ad?
really stupid post there buddy.Hello Liquidgels, I knew it was too good to be true.
it is a very good product and if i am aloud i will take parts of my log and post them here for youreally stupid post there buddy.
no one knows how good or not good this is yet. inside testers said they liked it. i dont believe them. but i will believe loggers testing this product in next 1-6 weeks
Bama, BigSmith said this was formulated for GNC and doesn't need a serm in pct...kinda makes me a little skeptical myself...Hello Liquidgels, I knew it was too good to be true.
believable if they superdosed it...i mean does hav the active ingredient of x factor in it. so mega dosed halodrol liquigels=10-20 pounds 10 being the norm and 20 being the guy that ate 7000 caloriesHalodrol Liquigels beta testers reported 10-20lb gain increases during trial runs. -Gaspari Nutrition
EXACTLY! NOW YOU GET IT! lmaoRun 5 boxes of liquigels in 1 month.
It is really easy to throw together study and create fudge factors to your products advantage.Halodrol Liquigels beta testers reported 10-20lb gain increases during trial runs. -Gaspari Nutrition
Wouldnt' that make it kind of like a few of the ALRI products you tested? I am thinking this will have effects similar to JW or BAM.Bama, BigSmith said this was formulated for GNC and doesn't need a serm in post cycle therapy...kinda makes me a little skeptical myself...
But I guess we'll have t wait and see.
Same here :thumbsup:I'm looking forward to testing this!
Ahh, yes. You always should take beta-testing with a grain of salt, my friend. If you're a big fan of ____'s products, and they pimp you out with some free stuff, would you go around telling people it's garbage?beta-testing.
Never even thought about it like that...makes sense though.Wouldnt' that make it kind of like a few of the ALRI products you tested? I am thinking this will have effects similar to JW or BAM.
I know you're not pointing a finger at me here, but I would like to say that everything I've tested has been scrutinized, and I've been honest with it all. Measurements, weights, effects, etc...Ahh, yes. You always should take beta-testing with a grain of salt, my friend. If you're a big fan of ____'s products, and they pimp you out with some free stuff, would you go around telling people it's garbage?
Same goes with company sponsored clinical trials as well,believe it or not. Vioxx was fine, until some independent trials came out; then they found out it was causing abnormal blood clots causing strokes.
The big push these days seems to be for a greater gains to sides ratio rather than simply greater gains. I think it's a step in the right direction.Never even thought about it like that...makes sense though.
I think the reason they called it Superdrol-Next Generation is because (1) Use of "Superdrol" let's the user know that it will (hopefully) be something powerful. (2) Next Generation in that new generations of prohormones are being designed to be weaker so that Johnny Nonuts doesn't go out and by yet another product like Sustevol, not even hear the words "Post", "Cycle", or "Therapy" , completely f*ck up his insides, and have the FDA breathing on their ass for putting out a product that can be harmful to uninformed/ignorant users.Stupid post, O.K. Lets make a bet. Take REAL Superdrol, log it. Then take the new one. Log It. Compare. Did I say it won't work. No. I said It sounds just like Liquid gels. Using the name of a Real PH to sell a combo of AA and Dhea and some ecdysterones.
It probably does work but not like the original. If you're gonna call it Superdrol-NG. Why not just call it something else and Say it's like superdrol but Non-Methyl and not the harsh sides.
Maybe Kiddiedrol
This is what Bigsmith had to say!We know from the abundance of research. Each tester will be getting a full two page document explaining it. Remember, this was created for GNC. They actually convinced us to re-issue the name.
So 6 months ago we put Dr.D on the warpath to get us a killer formula that wold also pass the GNC DSHEA, legal, and safety requirements.
You and me both.I understand. I just wish it was a better Superdrol, Not a weaker one. I also wish the easter bunny and Santa Claus were still real.
You can't be referring to bigschmidt :toofunny:Ahh, yes. You always should take beta-testing with a grain of salt, my friend. If you're a big fan of ____'s products, and they pimp you out with some free stuff, would you go around telling people it's garbage?
Same goes with company sponsored clinical trials as well,believe it or not. Vioxx was fine, until some independent trials came out; then they found out it was causing abnormal blood clots causing strokes.
I know you PI, I trust you, and you put together fairly unbiased logs. There's a couple of people who've been less than impressed with a the product being tested. But at the same time you have to keep in mind that there is a good possibility for biased information.I know you're not pointing a finger at me here, but I would like to say that everything I've tested has been scrutinized, and I've been honest with it all. Measurements, weights, effects, etc...
I mean look back at my ALRI log, I didn't care to much for part of it but loved others...
:goodpost:I know you PI, I trust you, and you put together fairly unbiased logs. There's a couple of people who've been less than impressed with a the product being tested. But at the same time you have to keep in mind that there is a good possibility for biased information.
All in all, what I'm trying to get at is if it's someone you don't know, and it sounds too good to be true, you should probably look elsewhere before coming to a conclusion.
ill tell u this brother,I know you PI, I trust you, and you put together fairly unbiased logs. There's a couple of people who've been less than impressed with a the product being tested. But at the same time you have to keep in mind that there is a good possibility for biased information.
All in all, what I'm trying to get at is if it's someone you don't know, and it sounds too good to be true, you should probably look elsewhere before coming to a conclusion.
I'm expecting it to be mild, yet effective; thanks for the reaffirmation. Just to reiterate, I wasn't pointing fingers on at anyone with what I had said. I've done some testing myself, and try to be as fair as I can be. I'm just simply stating that you have to take a 'beta-tester's log' for what it's worth. There's very little 'experimental control' used to fully assess the total and individual effectiveness of product; it is more of a means to generate more user-feedback.ill tell u this brother,
my 3AD log sucked i had alot going on at that time. with SDNG i was very unbiased with it, i didnt gain 20 pounds in a week or any of that bogus crap, like i said if i am allowed i would gladly share it with you, it is a rather good, yet mild product
i do agree with you on that statement. beta testing is beta testing. for example on mass fx one user had huge gains beyond anything i have heard of outside of m1t and superdrol, alot cant be said of it, i have even had customers claim to gain 20pounds off of methyl 1 d from legal gearI'm expecting it to be mild, yet effective; thanks for the reaffirmation. Just to reiterate, I wasn't pointing fingers on at anyone with what I had said. I've done some testing myself, and try to be as fair as I can be. I'm just simply stating that you have to take a 'beta-tester's log' for what it's worth. There's very little 'experimental control' used to fully assess the total and individual effectiveness of product; it is more of a means to generate more user-feedback.
It's just important that people understand how they should take hearing this kind of testing; otherwise, EVERYONE would be pimping MuscleTech's entire catalog.i do agree with you on that statement. beta testing is beta testing. for example on mass fx one user had huge gains beyond anything i have heard of outside of m1t and superdrol, alot cant be said of it, i have even had customers claim to gain 20pounds off of methyl 1 d from legal gear
bro if u actually looked into a little bit AX has said that they superdrol ng is not the same thing over and over againUgh, I hate marketing like this.
First there's Novedex-XT, which acts nothing like Nolvadex yet tricks tons of uninformed people into thinking that it's all they need for post cycle therapy.
Now Superdrol-NG, which if I'm understanding this correctly isn't Superdrol at all, but just piggybacking off the success of Superdrol.
Yes, but why the hell call it Superdrol then?bro if u actually looked into a little bit AX has said that they superdrol ng is not the same thing over and over again
You are making accusations based on assumptions.Yes, but why the hell call it Superdrol then?
Obviously to trick un-informed buyers into buying it thinking that they're going to get a potent oral steroid.
I mean why else would you name a product Superdrol-NG, if it has nothing to do with Superdrol?
Well, from everything I've read Superdrol-NG is not Superdrol. It is not a derivative of superdrol.You are making accusations based on assumptions.
a company is allowed to market, this a capatalistic society. AX is being very clear with their statements on it however. they are not acting like liquid masterdrol where it is 10 times better than any injectable or halodrol liquigels 10-20 pounds in a month. they are being straight forward with everythingWell, from everything I've read Superdrol-NG is not Superdrol. It is not a derivative of superdrol.
So, why call it Superdrol and then throw a little -NG on the end? The only reason I can think of is marketing.
a company is allowed to market, this a capatalistic society. AX is being very clear with their statements on it however. they are not acting like liquid masterdrol where it is 10 times better than any injectable or halodrol liquigels 10-20 pounds in a month. they are being straight forward with everything
A derivative of superdrol would be an illegal steroid: drostanolone, mestanolone, M5AA, or stanolone.Well, from everything I've read Superdrol-NG is not Superdrol. It is not a derivative of superdrol.
So, why call it Superdrol and then throw a little -NG on the end? The only reason I can think of is marketing.
I see your point. I guess if this delivers gains like Superdrol it could justify the name.A derivative of superdrol would be an illegal steroid: drostanolone, mestanolone, M5AA, or stanolone.
It is for marketing. Superdrol is a name you can identify with effective gains. Is this worthy of such a name? AX thinks so. Until it's out and we can say "No, no it doesn't", there's nothing much else to do but wait.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Superdrol Cycle with OCT and PCT…need your opinion | Anabolics | 37 | ||
Superdrol then winny after? | Anabolics | 4 | ||
Superdrol M1t | Anabolics | 25 | ||
Superdrol dosing | Anabolics | 37 | ||
Superdrol on top of a massive blast | Anabolics | 29 |