1-androsterone ?

  1. Board Supporter
    89coupe's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    37
    Posts
    157
    Rep Power
    533
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    68.85%

    Question 1-androsterone ?


    Does anyone know of or have used Advanced Muscle Science
    1- androsterone ,or 4- androstendiol

  2. Registered User
    Big BAMA's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  228 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,409
    Rep Power
    1305
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    10.51%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    seriously?
  3. Oldtimer
    bigschmidt821's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,177
    Rep Power
    686
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    8.7%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    lmao
    •   
       

  4. Board Supporter
    89coupe's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    37
    Posts
    157
    Rep Power
    533
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    68.85%

    Quote Originally Posted by Big BAMA View Post
    seriously?
    don't be an ass! I know what 1-AD and 4-AD are, but they are also banned. Advanced muscle science say they changed them so they can still sell them. I was hoping to find out if its any good. Oh, they also say its safe and non-toxic to the liver
  5. New Member
    anabolicloc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    127
    Rep Power
    157
    Level
    10
    Lv. Percent
    63.78%

    i was gonna order these prohormones a while back
    when i didn tknow anything about it
    ive heard recently
    that these are fake substances
    that their a big joke
    so i wouldnt waste my money on them
  6. Oldtimer
    bigschmidt821's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,177
    Rep Power
    686
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    8.7%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    the 4 AD is the fancy name for DHEA, and the 1AD seems to be bogus as well.
  7. Board Supporter
    89coupe's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    37
    Posts
    157
    Rep Power
    533
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    68.85%

    thanks guys thats the info I was looking for. Maybe I could have worded my question better the first time.
  8. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.82%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    No worries, some people get offensive because of the people who can post questions with obvious answers. It's all good
  9. Senior Member
    jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,253
    Rep Power
    745
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by bigschmidt821 View Post
    the 4 AD is the fancy name for DHEA, and the 1AD seems to be bogus as well.
    Ummm...I thought that DHEA had a double bond at the 5th carbon while this has one at the 4th. Seems exactly what they said it was, a crossbreed of andro and original 4-ad. Take test and make the -OH a =O at 17, then take the =O and make it an -OH at 3.
    I have not seen any good reviews of this product on this board but has anyone heard anything decent?
    I don't think 4-AD would be good on its own but might it be good as a stacker to have a little actual test in your body while shutting down your own? Thoughts?

    Supplement Facts

    Serving Size: 1 capsule
    Servings per Container: 60


    Amount Per Serving % Daily Value
    4-Androstene-3b-ol, 17-one 200mg **
    Stinging Nettle Root 100mg **
    1,4,6 etioallocholan-dione 5mg **
    Luteolin 3mg **
    Standarized Forkolin 10mg **
    Piperine 2mg **
  10. Senior Member
    jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,253
    Rep Power
    745
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Also I think someone said that this was tested and so was DHEA and they came back the same. They do have the same molecular weight and would most likely cleave at the same place so if the test was MS that would make sense to me. If anyone has the results of this test they have seen that would be cool though.
  11. Registered User
    Big BAMA's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  228 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,409
    Rep Power
    1305
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    10.51%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Didn't mean to sound like a peen. It's just this board gets so many questions that search can answer.
    The product is bunk. If you like the effects of it just dose DHEA and some other goodies and save your money. If you are looking for something non-Ph or non-PS try the evo stack from ARLI. It's Jungle warfare, Bad Ass Mass, And Restore. It's my between cycles cycle.
  12. Senior Member
    jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,253
    Rep Power
    745
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Big BAMA View Post
    Didn't mean to sound like a peen. It's just this board gets so many questions that search can answer.
    The product is bunk. If you like the effects of it just dose DHEA and some other goodies and save your money. If you are looking for something non-Ph or non-PS try the evo stack from ARLI. It's Jungle warfare, Bad Ass Mass, And Restore. It's my between cycles cycle.
    I see what you are saying but what I am saying is I think that a search on this will turn up the wrong info. Unless labeled incorrectly I am pretty sure this is not DHEA and would convert to test at least a little. Definately not good on its own but possibly good with a something else to help with libido? One thread here did show a good increase in test with this product, seemed he had really low levels anyways though if I recall.
    So I guess what I'm asking is does anyone think this would be a decent stacker with the legal methyl's and ph's that do a number on libido?
  13. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,986
    Rep Power
    986036
    Level
    68
    Lv. Percent
    70.46%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    I'll see if I can dig it up, but somebody logged it here with lab tests along the way...most weren't very impressed with the results.

    4-AD by AMS...any good?

    Unless labeled incorrectly I am pretty sure this is not DHEA and would convert to test at least a little
    One of the main ingredients is diandrone, which is an obsolete name for DHEA: 4-AD by AMS...any good?
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  14. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,986
    Rep Power
    986036
    Level
    68
    Lv. Percent
    70.46%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    ...sorry...the option to delete isn't showing up for some reason.
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  15. Senior Member
    jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,253
    Rep Power
    745
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by stxnas View Post
    One of the main ingredients is diandrone, which is an obsolete name for DHEA: 4-AD by AMS...any good?
    That is one of the reasons I posted. I read that but the label on nutraplanet does not say that. I posted the label a few post ago. Did they change the product? I don't see Diandrone ethyl ester or whatever anywhere. What I see on the label now is the "cross" b/w andro and 4-diol. DHEA would be a 5th carbon double bond not a 4th. I have seen the test results, seems it raised test levels slightly. This is what makes me think its not worthless as a stacker. That could be a misread test reading from ATD though also. So just pondering out loud really.
  16. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,986
    Rep Power
    986036
    Level
    68
    Lv. Percent
    70.46%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by jasonschaffin View Post
    That is one of the reasons I posted. I read that but the label on nutraplanet does not say that. I posted the label a few post ago. Did they change the product? I don't see Diandrone ethyl ester or whatever anywhere. What I see on the label now is the "cross" b/w andro and 4-diol. DHEA would be a 5th carbon double bond not a 4th. I have seen the test results, seems it raised test levels slightly. This is what makes me think its not worthless as a stacker. That could be a misread test reading from ATD though also. So just pondering out loud really.
    Oh...pardon my ignorance then. I didn't know that they had changed the label. I'm sure that it's nothing more than slight of hand and the ATD issue you brought up is likely the case IMO.
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  17. Senior Member
    jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,253
    Rep Power
    745
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    DHEA:3-hydroxy-5-androsten-17-one

    TEST:17β-hydroxy-4-androsten-3-one

    4-AD:4-Androstene-3b-ol, 17-one
  18. Senior Member
    jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,253
    Rep Power
    745
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    If the ATD is the reason it showed an increase than yes you are right, totally worthless. If it does convert, possibly good stacker. Max Muscle sells this product w/o the ATD, Nettle and such. Anybody ran it? Called TT-40 I think.
  19. New Member
    hcso37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    68
    Rep Power
    119
    Level
    7
    Lv. Percent
    55.56%

    Everyone seems to put down this particular product without using it and then they recommend some other "junk" for someone to take that they have tried and if someone on this forum is actually a chemist that could describe the whole process then dont say its junk when you havent even used it because for all you know is that it might work. Isnt that what we all hope for before we start something we havent taken before. Because if we are going to refer anything to the old andro days we need to refer to all of these new supplements as "junk". DHEA or not DHEA if you find a purpose for it and it actually works I will use it because if it didnt have a purpose it would not be so widespread maybe with all the advances in science nowadays maybe someone found a reason for it. For God sakes we never thought we would have phones that we could connect to the internet to 10 years ago or even have cell phones that work so good 20 years ago. And look at NO2 everything has it in its product nowadays when its been around since the begining!
  20. Elite Member
    john123131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,792
    Rep Power
    2991
    Level
    50
    Lv. Percent
    9.42%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by hcso37 View Post
    Everyone seems to put down this particular product without using it and then they recommend some other "junk" for someone to take that they have tried and if someone on this forum is actually a chemist that could describe the whole process then dont say its junk when you havent even used it because for all you know is that it might work. Isnt that what we all hope for before we start something we havent taken before. Because if we are going to refer anything to the old andro days we need to refer to all of these new supplements as "junk". DHEA or not DHEA if you find a purpose for it and it actually works I will use it because if it didnt have a purpose it would not be so widespread maybe with all the advances in science nowadays maybe someone found a reason for it. For God sakes we never thought we would have phones that we could connect to the internet to 10 years ago or even have cell phones that work so good 20 years ago. And look at NO2 everything has it in its product nowadays when its been around since the begining!
    end of rant?..hahah...jk man
    I hear you..
  21. New Member
    hcso37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    68
    Rep Power
    119
    Level
    7
    Lv. Percent
    55.56%

    I couldnt help myself man Im just so sick of alot of people who think they know it all on here
  22. Senior Member
    quigs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,252
    Rep Power
    10633
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    96.75%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by hcso37 View Post
    Everyone seems to put down this particular product without using it and then they recommend some other "junk" for someone to take that they have tried and if someone on this forum is actually a chemist that could describe the whole process then dont say its junk when you havent even used it because for all you know is that it might work. Isnt that what we all hope for before we start something we havent taken before. Because if we are going to refer anything to the old andro days we need to refer to all of these new supplements as "junk". DHEA or not DHEA if you find a purpose for it and it actually works I will use it because if it didnt have a purpose it would not be so widespread maybe with all the advances in science nowadays maybe someone found a reason for it. For God sakes we never thought we would have phones that we could connect to the internet to 10 years ago or even have cell phones that work so good 20 years ago. And look at NO2 everything has it in its product nowadays when its been around since the begining!
    Please see this post/thread:

    Which OTC Designer is the PH to Tren

    The AMS compounds are very promising, IMO, if you liked the old school prohormones.
  23. New Member
    andymo's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  87 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    120
    Rep Power
    115
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    52.91%

    This doesnt sound good at all.
  24. New Member
    MK9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    356
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    67.97%

    AMS has come out with a new version of 1-Ad, by adding increased bioavailability using Hydroxypropyl Beta Cyclodextrin.
    Primordial Performance uses 1-ad as well in a topical solution and there are lots of logs and pleased results.
    Personally if you have your diet is good and your training is good, then this compound will be of use solo, or as a stacker.

    At high doses of 500-800 mg's you will see some awesome results, but there is no need to do that when it is using the Hydroxypropyl Beta Cyclodextrin.

    MK9
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-24-2010, 07:12 AM
  2. SarmX with 1-Androsterone?
    By Creasy10 in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 12:51 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 10:15 PM
  4. 1 androsterone?? Has anyone tried it??
    By jerz912 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 02:53 AM
  5. 1-androsterone question
    By speedpastu in forum Supplements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-29-2006, 11:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in