Makaveli Im not taking glutamine except for whats in my whey.
I definetly appreciate your realistic approach to my question No Hype.
While there is no argument that monohydrate has been proven as an effective ergogen for most, I disagree that the aim of other generations of creatine is to achieve greater ergogenic properties than monohydrate.
I feel they have been geared more towards
1. improved bioavailability
2. reduced bloating discomfort, etc
As Im sure everyone already knows, our bodies produce about 2 grams a day on their own. When you take 5 grams of mono, if only 500 mg actually makes it through the system, leaving 4500mg of waste byproduct, you still have an average 25% increase in available creatine stores.
If any of these next gen creatines, many of which are based on monohydrate, can shuttle just 1 gram out of 5 grams oral administration, that yields a 50% increase in available pools, definetly a noticeable difference.
The point Im trying to make, is that I dont doubt that creatine works, I just know that some of us have yet to find a way for it to get to the point where it can work. And thats all Im trying to do.
But most likely I misunderstood your point, and you are saying the exact same thing.
I do think that 9 grams is too much, and I dont plan on using that much, but I was hoping that quantity, in conjunction with the insulin spike, and the acid protection that those products are touted to give will at least get a little bit of the good stuff where it needs to be to do its thing.