Saw Palmetto found to be ineffective with prostate health
- 02-14-2006, 12:36 AM
Damn those dribbles to hell. lol
"interestingly there is a hypothesis that higher estrogen may make the cells more sensitive to the effects of DHT"
I've long been suspicious of elevated estrogen levels in older men being the culprit of many conditions. That's why I think Proscar is a bad idea for men unless they are also addressing estrogen issues. Even then, I suspect that something like SP or beta sitasterol may be a better way to go if the condition is not extreme. The less aggressive binding of DHT by these compounds may be a good thing when one considers the estrogen antagonist role of DHT.
- 02-14-2006, 02:08 AM
Because they're all getting kickbacks from the pharmeceutical companies that spend big $$$ pushing drugs on their stations, that's why
Seriously though, I dont discount western medicine either. Not at all - but a lot of doctors are in it to just clear up symptoms, not heal and make the body fuction at its best. Then again, most people dont care about treating their bodies like a high-performance machine either.
I think that SP study has merit, but so do all the others as well as hundreds of anecdotal reports that support them.
That's like me seeing a study that minoxidil doesnt regrow hair. Now I know that's BS, but you'll have people swear up and down that that is the case because of one study they read.
02-14-2006, 09:00 AM
Part of that study makes perfect sense to me.
at 160mg x2 a day it didn't do anything for me either.
Now, at 320mg 2x/day ....it worked quite well. I believe the dosage has a lot to do with the study's results.
02-14-2006, 09:45 AM
thanks jay this confirms what i really thought but didnt want to believe so about my age and this problem. hopefully i can still cycle but add sw/an AI/and cabergoline to keep prolactin/estro low.....or is this the end ?Originally Posted by Jay Mc
02-14-2006, 10:55 AM
I'd be more worried about what your lipids are doing than your prostate at this point. Ultimately, its going to come down to do more gains merit the risk of xxxxx complication. If I told you you'd be safe or that you'd for sure be in danger I'd be talking out my ass, just too many variables.Originally Posted by WATERLOGGED
02-14-2006, 10:58 AM
Really no one should be surprised there was a study where SP failed to work. Long term studies show no single drug will be good enough in everyone. Dutasteride fails. Finasteride fails.Originally Posted by BigVrunga
02-14-2006, 11:36 AM
i'm goin in for blood work in a couple more weeks its been 11 weeks since my cycle end. so i'll see where i stand and then make a decision., are those prostate drugs tamsulosin or doxazosin already combos or do i need to get dutrasterice and an alpha blocker ?
02-14-2006, 01:24 PM
tamsulosin is an alpha 1A specific blocker only. Doxazosin is a nonselective alpha blocker. Talk to your doctor and he/she can probably help you decide which is best for you personally.Originally Posted by WATERLOGGED
You don't have to get dutasteride or finasteride. You can keep using the if you'd like. They all work in about the same way. The only difference is the other two have gone through more trials. It takes like 500 million bucks to bring a drug to market, where as an herbal is pretty much free. There is at least one study that compared SP to fina i think (I can't remember if it was a direct clinical trial or if it was a metanalysis). They both worked about the same from what I remember.
02-14-2006, 04:17 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By Ziquor in forum SupplementsReplies: 37Last Post: 11-10-2010, 12:30 AM
- By LakeMountD in forum SupplementsReplies: 29Last Post: 02-28-2006, 02:00 PM
- By Beau in forum SupplementsReplies: 6Last Post: 02-24-2005, 07:34 PM
- By OmarJackson in forum SupplementsReplies: 15Last Post: 12-05-2004, 11:25 PM