First, please don't make up your own quotes under someone else's name, if your going to quote someone at least go to the source. This is how misguided information begins.
lqtm
or maybe there's a third option...
learning how to distinguish verbatim quotation of someone (as I have done above for example, with your post), versus off-setting a generalized idea in current discussion by these "quotation marks" (<--- like so)..
but I thank you for your valuable feedback...however I will continue with my style of posting and quoting, thanks
In the end its pretty typical of research with evidence on both sides, read, learn, and make your own informed decision.
more verbatim quoting, you see...
are you bipolar? first you argue with me and tell me I am wrong in my stance; then, you say to read and learn and make your own informed decision -- which is what I have done, no?
in any event, let's agree to be done with this nitpicking discussion, shall we?
bottom line -- to the topic at hand and the TITLE of the thread:
NO, zinc is NOT the best natural testosterone booster, in generic discussion or comparison, because in the absence of metabolic zinc deficiency it will not oinly have NO bearing on this hormonal output, it can indeed become toxic and have negative attributes
the more pertinent and realistic point of this whole story is:
proper mineral balance in the body (ALL minerals) is essential for proper function of MANY bodily functions...
mineral function acts together in concert, not as solo artists
/thread